Literature DB >> 29896023

Comparison of outcome after ACL reconstruction in terms of subjective assessment of symptoms and function and clinical assessment of ligament stability.

Abhinav Bhardwaj1, Narender Singh Solanki1, Hemant Jain1, Kishore Raichandani1, Surbhi Raichandani1, Vistasp Daruwalla2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The knee joint is frequently involved in sports and other injuries with Anterior cruciate ligament being a very common ligament to be injured. The Lachman test, pivot-shift test, and instrumented knee laxity examination are frequently used and reported for evaluation of ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study is to examine and evaluate the relationships between the clinical assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after ACL reconstruction.
METHODS: A total of 50 young and middle aged patients with unilateral knee ACL injury treated with ACL reconstruction using hamstring graft were evaluated for a minimum period of 1 year. Clinical assessment of ligament stability was done through Lachman and pivot-shift examination. Subjective variables of symptoms at follow-up included pain, swelling, instability and locking of knee. Subjective function at follow up included satisfaction with outcome, squatting, ascending or descending stairs, jumping, twisting and Lysholm score.
RESULTS: Lachman Examination at follow-up had no significant (P > .05) relationship with pain, swelling, instability, locking, squatting, ascending or descending stairs, jumping, twisting, satisfaction with outcome and Lysholm score. Pivot-shift examination at follow-up had significant associations with patient satisfaction (P = .04), instability of knee (P = .02), difficulty during twisting (P = .02) and Lysholm score (P = .01).
CONCLUSION: Pivot-shift examination is a better measure than Lachman examination or instrumented knee laxity as far as patients' functional outcome and overall satisfaction is concerned.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL); Functional outcome; Impairment; Lachman test; Ligament stability; Pivot shift test

Year:  2016        PMID: 29896023      PMCID: PMC5994999          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2016.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma        ISSN: 0976-5662


  15 in total

1.  Analysis of subjective, objective and functional examination tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A follow-up of 527 patients.

Authors:  N Sernert; J Kartus; K Köhler; S Stener; J Larsson; B I Eriksson; J Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Mininder S Kocher; J Richard Steadman; Karen K Briggs; William I Sterett; Richard J Hawkins
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  [Value of the pivot-shift phenomenon and lateral reconstruction; diagnosis and therapy of anterior cruciate ligament rupture].

Authors:  R P Jakob; B Noesberger; U Saxer
Journal:  Schweiz Z Sportmed       Date:  1977

4.  Comparison of score evaluations and instrumented measurement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  R Hrubesch; C Rangger; M Reichkendler; R F Sailer; W Gloetzer; G Eibl
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form.

Authors:  F Hefti; W Müller; R P Jakob; H U Stäubli
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Observations on rotatory instability of the lateral compartment of the knee. Experimental studies on the functional anatomy and the pathomechanism of the true and the reversed pivot shift sign.

Authors:  R P Jakob; H Hassler; H U Staeubli
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1981

7.  Laxity, instability, and functional outcome after ACL injury: copers versus noncopers.

Authors:  M E Eastlack; M J Axe; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  The relationship between passive joint laxity and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  L Snyder-Mackler; G K Fitzgerald; A R Bartolozzi; M G Ciccotti
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Relationship between Selected Physical Characteristics and Functional Capacity in the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Insufficient Athlete.

Authors:  S M Lephart; D H Perrin; F H Fu; J H Gieck; F C McCue; J J Irrgang
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.751

10.  Long-term outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with an autologous four-strand semitendinosus tendon autograft.

Authors:  Nikolaus A Streich; Sebastian Reichenbacher; Alexander Barié; Matthias Buchner; Holger Schmitt
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.