Literature DB >> 29896001

Postpartum Intrauterine Device Refusal in Delhi: Reasons Analyzed.

Aruna Nigam1,2, Ayesha Ahmad1, Anshu Sharma1, Poonam Saith1, Swaraj Batra1.   

Abstract

AIM: To assess knowledge and attitude of women toward postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device (PPIUCD) and analyze reasons of refusal. SETTING AND
DESIGN: Hospital-based cross-sectional study for 1 year.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: 550 women were enrolled in the study. Sociodemographic characteristics, knowledge, and attitude toward contraception especially PPIUCD were noted, and the reasons for refusal of PPIUCD were analyzed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: SPSS version 17.0 is used. Continuous variables were reported using mean, and categorical variables were reported using percentages. OBSERVATIONS: PPIUCD insertion rate was 9.1 %. 78.6 % of women in the study belonged to the age group of 20-30 years, with 79.2 % having education of Class X and above. The overall contraceptive knowledge was 94.4 %. Although 48.4 % women were aware of Cu T as a method of contraception, only 21.9 % of 48.4 %, however, were aware of PPIUCD. None of the women had ever used it before. The commonest prevalent myths regarding Cu T were fear of malignancy (38 %) and fear of menorrhagia (36.4 %). The husband and mother-in-law played important roles in decision regarding PPIUCD insertion and refused the same in 59 % of cases.
CONCLUSION: The study shows that awareness of PPIUCD is low in this region despite good education, leading to high refusal rates. The commonest reason is lack of appropriate counseling, and not only the woman but the husband and mother-in-law also must be provided the knowledge of it as they play important roles in our society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Family planning; Intrauterine contraceptive device; Postpartum

Year:  2015        PMID: 29896001      PMCID: PMC5972083          DOI: 10.1007/s13224-015-0714-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India        ISSN: 0975-6434


  8 in total

Review 1.  Immediate post-partum insertion of intrauterine devices.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Laureen M Lopez; Kenneth F Schulz; Huib Aam Van Vliet; Nancy L Stanwood
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-05-12

Review 2.  Intrauterine device insertion during the postpartum period: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nathalie Kapp; Kathryn M Curtis
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2009-08-29       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Long-term reversible contraception. Twelve years of experience with the TCu380A and TCu220C.

Authors: 
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  The risk of pregnancy after tubal sterilization: findings from the U.S. Collaborative Review of Sterilization.

Authors:  H B Peterson; Z Xia; J M Hughes; L S Wilcox; L R Tylor; J Trussell
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Dynamics of contraceptive practice amongst urban Indian women.

Authors:  J K Kanojia; N C Nirbhavane; V S Toddywala; S S Betrabet; S B Patel; S Datte; L Gaur; B N Saxena
Journal:  Natl Med J India       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.537

6.  Knowledge of emergency contraception and contraceptive practices: representative study from rural uttar pradesh.

Authors:  Aruna Nigam; Neha Maheshwari; Anupam Prakash
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2010-07

7.  Acceptability for the use of postpartum intrauterine contraceptive devices: Assiut experience.

Authors:  Safwat A Mohamed; Momen A Kamel; Omar M Shaaban; Hossam T Salem
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.927

8.  Women's experience with postpartum intrauterine contraceptive device use in India.

Authors:  Somesh Kumar; Reena Sethi; Sudharsanam Balasubramaniam; Elaine Charurat; Kamlesh Lalchandani; Richard Semba; Bulbul Sood
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.223

  8 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Barriers and Enablers Influencing Women's Adoption and Continuation of Vaginally Inserted Contraceptive Methods: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Danielle M Harris; Anita Dam; Kate Morrison; Chastain Mann; Ashley Jackson; Shannon M Bledsoe; Andrea Rowan; Kim Longfield
Journal:  Stud Fam Plann       Date:  2022-08-03
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.