Literature DB >> 29895302

The mechanism of action of the adrenomedullin-binding antibody adrecizumab.

Christopher Geven1,2, Peter Pickkers3,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29895302      PMCID: PMC5998508          DOI: 10.1186/s13054-018-2074-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care        ISSN: 1364-8535            Impact factor:   9.097


× No keyword cloud information.
With interest we read the review by Levy et al. [1] that provides a thorough overview of current and future therapies aiming to treat vasoplegia, an ubiquitous phenomenon in shock. In their work, the authors dedicated a section to the novel adrenomedullin (ADM)-binding antibody adrecizumab, which is mentioned as an ADM blocking compound in the section title. Recently published studies demonstrate that blocking of ADM does not accurately describe adrecizumab’s mechanism of action, though. In contrast to what is often intuitively assumed, not all antibodies completely inhibit the activity of their targets. The extent of signaling inhibition can vary greatly, depending on the epitope to which the antibodies bind and other factors, such as antibody concentrations. In contrast to C-terminus binding anti-ADM antibodies which completely inhibit ADM signaling, antibodies against the N-terminus of ADM, including the humanized monoclonal antibody adrecizumab, only marginally inhibit ADM activity, despite their high affinity and even when applied in vast molar excess over ADM [2]. Interestingly, animal and human data reveal a strong, dose-dependent increase of plasma ADM concentrations upon adrecizumab infusion [3, 4], which cannot be explained by increased production of ADM. A mechanistic explanation for this occurrence was recently proposed [5]. Excess antibody that remains in the circulation is thought to drain ADM from the interstitium into the circulation, since ADM is small enough to cross the endothelial barrier, whereas the antibody is not. While adrecizumab only partially inhibits ADM signaling, the strong concentration increase of ADM (complexed with adrecizumab) in the circulation is thought to result in an overall “net” increase of ADM activity on endothelial cells, augmenting endothelial barrier stabilizing effects, while decreased concentrations of ADM in the interstitium reduce vasodilatory effects on vascular smooth muscle cells. The combination of attenuation of both endothelial leakage and vasodilation likely represents the therapeutic potential of adrecizumab. This hypothesis fits well with previous studies that showed beneficial effects of ADM agonists in animal models of shock, while complete inhibition of ADM did not improve outcome. As is mentioned by the authors, a proof-of-concept and dose-finding phase II study with adrecizumab is currently ongoing in patients with septic shock and elevated levels of ADM (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03085758). This trial incorporates a number of innovative features such as a novel composite efficacy endpoint and biomarker-guided patient selection (enrolment based on bio-ADM level), making it one of the first personalized treatment trials in sepsis.
  5 in total

1.  Safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of the adrenomedullin antibody adrecizumab in a first-in-human study and during experimental human endotoxaemia in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Christopher Geven; Dirk van Lier; Alice Blet; Roel Peelen; Bas Ten Elzen; Alexandre Mebazaa; Matthijs Kox; Peter Pickkers
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Vascular Effects of Adrenomedullin and the Anti-Adrenomedullin Antibody Adrecizumab in Sepsis.

Authors:  Christopher Geven; Andreas Bergmann; Matthijs Kox; Peter Pickkers
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  Effects of the Humanized Anti-Adrenomedullin Antibody Adrecizumab (HAM8101) on Vascular Barrier Function and Survival in Rodent Models of Systemic Inflammation and Sepsis.

Authors:  Christopher Geven; Esther Peters; Mathias Schroedter; Joachim Struck; Andreas Bergmann; Oscar McCook; Peter Radermacher; Matthijs Kox; Peter Pickkers
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Epitope specificity of anti-Adrenomedullin antibodies determines efficacy of mortality reduction in a cecal ligation and puncture mouse model.

Authors:  Joachim Struck; Frauke Hein; Siegmund Karasch; Andreas Bergmann
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2013-10-29

Review 5.  Vasoplegia treatments: the past, the present, and the future.

Authors:  Bruno Levy; Caroline Fritz; Elsa Tahon; Audrey Jacquot; Thomas Auchet; Antoine Kimmoun
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Molecular Mechanisms of Class B GPCR Activation: Insights from Adrenomedullin Receptors.

Authors:  Michael L Garelja; Maggie Au; Margaret A Brimble; Joseph J Gingell; Erica R Hendrikse; Annie Lovell; Nicole Prodan; Patrick M Sexton; Andrew Siow; Christopher S Walker; Harriet A Watkins; Geoffrey M Williams; Denise Wootten; Sung H Yang; Paul W R Harris; Debbie L Hay
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2020-02-26

Review 2.  Biomarkers for the Prediction and Judgement of Sepsis and Sepsis Complications: A Step towards precision medicine?

Authors:  Thilo von Groote; Melanie Meersch-Dini
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 3.  Promotion of vascular integrity in sepsis through modulation of bioactive adrenomedullin and dipeptidyl peptidase 3.

Authors:  D van Lier; M Kox; P Pickkers
Journal:  J Intern Med       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  New Agents in Development for Sepsis: Any Reason for Hope?

Authors:  Philippe Vignon; Pierre-François Laterre; Thomas Daix; Bruno François
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 9.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.