BACKGROUND: Posttransplant liver steatosis occurs frequently and can affect patient outcome. Our aim was to clarify the risk factors for steatosis or steatohepatitis after living donor liver transplantation (LT) through a retrospective examination of recent 100 living donor LT recipients and their liver donors. METHODS: Liver biopsy was performed at 1 year after LT and each year, thereafter, or as needed due to abnormal liver enzyme levels, with a median follow-up of 4 years (2-10 years). RESULTS: Liver steatosis (≥5%) was identified in 33 cases, with steatohepatitis identified in 9 of 33 patients with liver steatosis. Recipients with liver steatosis were younger than those without steatosis (53.4 ± 9.5 years vs 57.6 ± 9.9 years, respectively; P = 0.045). Of note, the prevalence of steatosis was significantly higher among LT recipients who received a graft from a donor with steatosis than without (60% vs 23%, respectively; P = 0.001). Donor steatosis was also associated with steatohepatitis in recipients after LT (steatohepatitis/simple steatosis, 88%:50%). On multivariate analysis, younger recipient age (P = 0.023) and donor steatosis (P = 0.005) were independent risk factors of liver steatosis after LT. Among the 33 recipients in our study group, 26 were assessed by serial liver biopsies, with 6 showing progression of the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score. An increase in body weight was predictive of steatosis progression after LT (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Age and donor steatosis influence the risk of liver steatosis and steatohepatitis in recipients after LT. The clinical course of steatosis is relatively benign, with only 19% developing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score and 7.6% significant fibrosis.
BACKGROUND: Posttransplant liver steatosis occurs frequently and can affect patient outcome. Our aim was to clarify the risk factors for steatosis or steatohepatitis after living donor liver transplantation (LT) through a retrospective examination of recent 100 living donor LT recipients and their liver donors. METHODS: Liver biopsy was performed at 1 year after LT and each year, thereafter, or as needed due to abnormal liver enzyme levels, with a median follow-up of 4 years (2-10 years). RESULTS:Liver steatosis (≥5%) was identified in 33 cases, with steatohepatitis identified in 9 of 33 patients with liver steatosis. Recipients with liver steatosis were younger than those without steatosis (53.4 ± 9.5 years vs 57.6 ± 9.9 years, respectively; P = 0.045). Of note, the prevalence of steatosis was significantly higher among LT recipients who received a graft from a donor with steatosis than without (60% vs 23%, respectively; P = 0.001). Donorsteatosis was also associated with steatohepatitis in recipients after LT (steatohepatitis/simple steatosis, 88%:50%). On multivariate analysis, younger recipient age (P = 0.023) and donorsteatosis (P = 0.005) were independent risk factors of liver steatosis after LT. Among the 33 recipients in our study group, 26 were assessed by serial liver biopsies, with 6 showing progression of the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score. An increase in body weight was predictive of steatosis progression after LT (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Age and donorsteatosis influence the risk of liver steatosis and steatohepatitis in recipients after LT. The clinical course of steatosis is relatively benign, with only 19% developing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score and 7.6% significant fibrosis.