Marc d'Elbée1, Pitchaya P Indravudh2, Lawrence Mwenge3, Moses M Kumwenda2, Musonda Simwinga3, Augustine T Choko2,4, Bernadette Hensen4, Melissa Neuman4, Jason J Ong5, Euphemia L Sibanda6,7, Cheryl C Johnson8,9, Karin Hatzold10, Frances M Cowan6,7, Helen Ayles3,11, Elizabeth L Corbett2,8, Fern Terris-Prestholt1. 1. Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 2. Malawi-Liverpool Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi. 3. Zambart, Lusaka, Zambia. 4. Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health. 5. International Diagnostics Centre, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 6. Centre for Sexual Health HIV and AIDS Research, Harare, Zimbabwe. 7. Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool. 8. Department of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 9. Department of HIV/AIDS, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. 10. Population Services International, Harare, Zimbabwe. 11. London Centre for Neglected Tropical Disease Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The current research identifies key drivers of demand for linkage into care following a reactive HIV self-test result in Malawi and Zambia. Preferences are explored among the general population and key groups such as HIV-positive individuals and adolescents. DESIGN: We used discrete choice experiments (DCEs) embedded in representative household surveys to quantify the relative strength of preferences for various HIV services characteristics. METHODS: The DCE was designed on the basis of a literature review and qualitative studies. Data were collected within a survey (Malawi n = 553, Zambia n = 388), pooled across country and analysed using mixed logit models. Preference heterogeneity was explored by country, age, sex, wealth, HIV status and belief that HIV treatment is effective. RESULTS: DCE results were largely consistent across countries. Major barriers for linkage were fee-based testing and long wait for testing. Community-based confirmatory testing, that is at the participant's or counsellor's home, was preferred to facility-based confirmation. Providing separated waiting areas for HIV services at health facilities and mobile clinics was positively viewed in Malawi but not in Zambia. Active support for linkage was less important to respondents than other attributes. Preference heterogeneity was identified: overall, adolescents were more willing to seek care than adults, whereas HIV-positive participants were more likely to link at health facilities with separate HIV services. CONCLUSION: Populations in Malawi and in Zambia were responsive to low-cost, HIV care services with short waiting time provided either at the community or privately at health facilities. Hard-to-reach groups could be encouraged to link to care with targeted support.
OBJECTIVES: The current research identifies key drivers of demand for linkage into care following a reactive HIV self-test result in Malawi and Zambia. Preferences are explored among the general population and key groups such as HIV-positive individuals and adolescents. DESIGN: We used discrete choice experiments (DCEs) embedded in representative household surveys to quantify the relative strength of preferences for various HIV services characteristics. METHODS: The DCE was designed on the basis of a literature review and qualitative studies. Data were collected within a survey (Malawi n = 553, Zambia n = 388), pooled across country and analysed using mixed logit models. Preference heterogeneity was explored by country, age, sex, wealth, HIV status and belief that HIV treatment is effective. RESULTS: DCE results were largely consistent across countries. Major barriers for linkage were fee-based testing and long wait for testing. Community-based confirmatory testing, that is at the participant's or counsellor's home, was preferred to facility-based confirmation. Providing separated waiting areas for HIV services at health facilities and mobile clinics was positively viewed in Malawi but not in Zambia. Active support for linkage was less important to respondents than other attributes. Preference heterogeneity was identified: overall, adolescents were more willing to seek care than adults, whereas HIV-positive participants were more likely to link at health facilities with separate HIV services. CONCLUSION: Populations in Malawi and in Zambia were responsive to low-cost, HIV care services with short waiting time provided either at the community or privately at health facilities. Hard-to-reach groups could be encouraged to link to care with targeted support.
Authors: Hannah Appelbaum Belisle; Monique Hennink; Claudia E Ordóñez; Sally John; Eunephacia Ngubane-Joye; Jane Hampton; Henry Sunpath; Eleanor Preston-Whyte; Vincent C Marconi Journal: Glob Public Health Date: 2014-10-27
Authors: Augustine Talumba Choko; Nicola Desmond; Emily L Webb; Kondwani Chavula; Sue Napierala-Mavedzenge; Charlotte A Gaydos; Simon D Makombe; Treza Chunda; S Bertel Squire; Neil French; Victor Mwapasa; Elizabeth L Corbett Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2011-10-04 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Pitchaya P Indravudh; Euphemia L Sibanda; Marc d'Elbée; Moses K Kumwenda; Beate Ringwald; Galven Maringwa; Musonda Simwinga; Lot J Nyirenda; Cheryl C Johnson; Karin Hatzold; Fern Terris-Prestholt; Miriam Taegtmeyer Journal: AIDS Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Augustine T Choko; Peter MacPherson; Emily L Webb; Barbara A Willey; Helena Feasy; Rodrick Sambakunsi; Aaron Mdolo; Simon D Makombe; Nicola Desmond; Richard Hayes; Hendramoorthy Maheswaran; Elizabeth L Corbett Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Andrew D Kerkhoff; Kombatende Sikombe; Ingrid Eshun-Wilson; Izukanji Sikazwe; David V Glidden; Jake M Pry; Paul Somwe; Laura K Beres; Sandra Simbeza; Chanda Mwamba; Chama Bukankala; Cardinal Hantuba; Carolyn Bolton Moore; Charles B Holmes; Nancy Padian; Elvin H Geng Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Heather Ingold; Ombeni Mwerinde; Anna Laura Ross; Ross Leach; Elizabeth L Corbett; Karin Hatzold; Cheryl C Johnson; Getrude Ncube; Rose Nyirenda; Rachel C Baggaley Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Carrie E Lyons; Karleen Coly; Anna L Bowring; Benjamin Liestman; Daouda Diouf; Vincent J Wong; Gnilane Turpin; Delivette Castor; Penda Dieng; Oluwasolape Olawore; Scott Geibel; Sosthenes Ketende; Cheikh Ndour; Safiatou Thiam; Coumba Touré-Kane; Stefan D Baral Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2019-09
Authors: Euphemia L Sibanda; Marc d'Elbée; Galven Maringwa; Nancy Ruhode; Mary Tumushime; Claudius Madanhire; Jason J Ong; Pitchaya Indravudh; Constancia Watadzaushe; Cheryl C Johnson; Karin Hatzold; Miriam Taegtmeyer; James R Hargreaves; Elizabeth L Corbett; Frances M Cowan; Fern Terris-Prestholt Journal: J Int AIDS Soc Date: 2019-03 Impact factor: 5.396
Authors: Jan Ostermann; Bernard Njau; Amy Hobbie; Tara Mtuy; Martha L Masaki; Aisa Shayo; Marco van Zwetselaar; Max Masnick; Brian Flaherty; Derek S Brown; Axel C Mühlbacher; Nathan M Thielman Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Marc d'Elbée; Gabriela B Gomez; Linda Alinafe Sande; Lawrence Mwenge; Collin Mangenah; Cheryl Johnson; Graham F Medley; Melissa Neuman; Karin Hatzold; Elizabeth Lucy Corbett; Gesine Meyer-Rath; Fern Terris-Prestholt Journal: BMJ Glob Health Date: 2021-07