Literature DB >> 29893989

Neurovascular stent artifacts in 3D-TOF and 3D-PCMRI: Influence of stent design on flow measurement.

Pierre Bouillot1,2, Olivier Brina1,3, Bénédicte M A Delattre4, Rafik Ouared1, Alain Pellaton1, Hasan Yilmaz1, Paolo Machi1, Karl-Olof Lovblad1, Mohamed Farhat2, Vitor Mendes Pereira1,3,5, Maria Isabel Vargas1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The morphological and hemodynamic evaluations of neurovascular diseases treated with stents would benefit from noninvasive imaging techniques such as 3D time-of-flight MRI (3D-TOF) and 3D phase contrast MRI (3D-PCMRI). For this purpose, a comprehensive evaluation of the stent artifacts and their impact on the flow measurement is critical.
METHODS: The artifacts of a representative sample of neurovascular stents were evaluated in vitro with 3D-TOF and 3D-PCMRI sequences. The dependency of the artifacts with respect to the orientation was analyzed for each stent design as well as the impact on the flow measurement accuracy. Furthermore, the 3D-PCMRI data of four patients carrying intracranial aneurysms treated with flow diverter stents were analyzed as illustrative examples.
RESULTS: The stent artifacts were mainly confined to the stent lumen therefore indicating the leading role of shielding effect. The influence of the stent design and its orientation with respect to the transmitting MR coils were highlighted. The artifacts impacted the 3D-PCMRI velocities mainly in the low magnitude domains, which were discarded from the analysis ensuring reliable near-stent velocities. The feasibility of in-stent flow measurements was confirmed in vivo on two patients who showed strong correlation between flow and geometric features. In two other patients, the consistency of out-of-stent velocities was verified qualitatively through intra-aneurysmal streamlines except when susceptibility artifacts occurred.
CONCLUSION: The present results motivate the conception of low inductance or nonconductive stent design. Furthermore, the feasibility of near-stent 3D-PCMRI measurements opens the door to clinical applications like the post-treatment follow-up of stenoses or intracranial aneurysms.
© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artifact; blood flow; neurovascular diseases; phase contrast MRI; stent

Year:  2018        PMID: 29893989     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  3 in total

1.  How Flow Reduction Influences the Intracranial Aneurysm Occlusion: A Prospective 4D Phase-Contrast MRI Study.

Authors:  O Brina; P Bouillot; P Reymond; A S Luthman; C Santarosa; M Fahrat; K O Lovblad; P Machi; B M A Delattre; V M Pereira; M I Vargas
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  3D amplified MRI (aMRI).

Authors:  Itamar Terem; Leo Dang; Allen Champagne; Javid Abderezaei; Aymeric Pionteck; Zainab Almadan; Anna-Maria Lydon; Mehmet Kurt; Miriam Scadeng; Samantha J Holdsworth
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  The implications of magnetic resonance angiography artifacts caused by different types of intracranial flow diverters.

Authors:  Batur Halitcan; Sayin Bige; Balci Sinan; Akmangit Ilkay; Daglioglu Ergun; Alagoz Fatih; Arat Anil
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 5.364

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.