PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (F-FDG PET/CT) for lymph node (LN) metastasis and the prognostic significance of F-FDG PET/CT LN parameters in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent staging F-FDG PET/CT between May 2007 and September 2016 were retrospectively enrolled and analyzed through medical record and image re-evaluation. The diagnostic accuracy of F-FDG PET/CT in predicting LN metastasis was evaluated and compared with that of contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CECT). Prognostic variables, including LN parameters assessed by F-FDG PET/CT [standardized uptake value (SUV)LN and LN/tumor SUV ratio], that affect disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by regression analysis. RESULTS: When predicting LN metastasis, F-FDG PET/CT showed greater sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy than CECT. Among prognostic factors affecting DFS, PET-positive LN (P=0.008), and LN/tumor SUV ratio (P=0.003) were found to be significant by regression analysis. Among the variables affecting OS, lymphovascular invasion (P=0.018) and the LN/tumor SUV ratio (P=0.046) were found to be significant. CONCLUSION: F-FDG PET/CT showed higher diagnostic accuracy in predicting LN metastasis than CECT in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Only the LN/tumor SUV ratio of F-FDG PET/CT was an independent prognostic variable in both DFS and OS.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (F-FDG PET/CT) for lymph node (LN) metastasis and the prognostic significance of F-FDG PET/CT LN parameters in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with resectable pancreatic cancer who underwent staging F-FDG PET/CT between May 2007 and September 2016 were retrospectively enrolled and analyzed through medical record and image re-evaluation. The diagnostic accuracy of F-FDG PET/CT in predicting LN metastasis was evaluated and compared with that of contrast-enhanced abdominal computed tomography (CECT). Prognostic variables, including LN parameters assessed by F-FDG PET/CT [standardized uptake value (SUV)LN and LN/tumor SUV ratio], that affect disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by regression analysis. RESULTS: When predicting LN metastasis, F-FDG PET/CT showed greater sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy than CECT. Among prognostic factors affecting DFS, PET-positive LN (P=0.008), and LN/tumor SUV ratio (P=0.003) were found to be significant by regression analysis. Among the variables affecting OS, lymphovascular invasion (P=0.018) and the LN/tumor SUV ratio (P=0.046) were found to be significant. CONCLUSION:F-FDG PET/CT showed higher diagnostic accuracy in predicting LN metastasis than CECT in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer. Only the LN/tumor SUV ratio of F-FDG PET/CT was an independent prognostic variable in both DFS and OS.
Authors: Florian N Loch; Patrick Asbach; Matthias Haas; Hendrik Seeliger; Katharina Beyer; Christian Schineis; Claudius E Degro; Georgios A Margonis; Martin E Kreis; Carsten Kamphues Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2020-08-18 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Yongzhu Pu; Chun Wang; Sheng Zhao; Ran Xie; Lei Zhao; Kun Li; Conghui Yang; Rui Zhang; Yadong Tian; Lixian Tan; Jindan Li; Shujuan Li; Long Chen; Hua Sun Journal: Transl Cancer Res Date: 2021-07 Impact factor: 1.241