Gregory M Schrank1, Sharon B Wright1, Westyn Branch-Elliman2, Mary T LaSalvia1. 1. 1Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center,Divisions of Infectious Diseases and Infection Control/Hospital Epidemiology,Boston,Massachusetts. 2. 2Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System,Boston,Massachusetts.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a safe and effective alternative to prolonged inpatient stays for patients requiring long-term intravenous antimicrobials, but antimicrobial-associated adverse events remain a significant challenge. Thus, we sought to measure the association between choice of antimicrobial agent (vancomycin vs daptomycin) and incidence of adverse drug events (ADEs). METHODS: Patients receiving OPAT treatment with vancomycin or daptomycin for skin and soft-tissue infections, bone and joint infections, endocarditis, and bacteremia or endovascular infections during the period from July 1, 2013, through September 30, 2016, were included. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from the medical record. Logistic regression was used to compare ADEs requiring a change in or early discontinuation of therapy, hospital readmission, and emergency room visits between groups. Time from OPAT enrollment to ADE was compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: In total, 417 patients were included: 312 (74·8%) received vancomycin and 105 (25·2%) received daptomycin. After adjusting for age, Charlson comorbidity index, location of OPAT treatment, receipt of combination therapy with either β-lactam or fluoroquinolone, renal function, and availability of safety labs, patients receiving vancomycin had significantly higher incidence of ADEs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3·71; 95% CI, 1·64-8·40). ADEs occurred later in the treatment course for patients treated with daptomycin (P<·01). Rates of readmission and emergency room visits were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In the OPAT setting, vancomycin use was associated with higher incidence of ADEs than daptomycin use. This finding is an important policy consideration for programs aiming to optimize outcomes and minimize cost. Careful selection of gram-positive agents for prolonged treatment is necessary to limit toxicity.
OBJECTIVE:Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) is a safe and effective alternative to prolonged inpatient stays for patients requiring long-term intravenous antimicrobials, but antimicrobial-associated adverse events remain a significant challenge. Thus, we sought to measure the association between choice of antimicrobial agent (vancomycin vs daptomycin) and incidence of adverse drug events (ADEs). METHODS:Patients receiving OPAT treatment with vancomycin or daptomycin for skin and soft-tissue infections, bone and joint infections, endocarditis, and bacteremia or endovascular infections during the period from July 1, 2013, through September 30, 2016, were included. Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from the medical record. Logistic regression was used to compare ADEs requiring a change in or early discontinuation of therapy, hospital readmission, and emergency room visits between groups. Time from OPAT enrollment to ADE was compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: In total, 417 patients were included: 312 (74·8%) received vancomycin and 105 (25·2%) received daptomycin. After adjusting for age, Charlson comorbidity index, location of OPAT treatment, receipt of combination therapy with either β-lactam or fluoroquinolone, renal function, and availability of safety labs, patients receiving vancomycin had significantly higher incidence of ADEs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3·71; 95% CI, 1·64-8·40). ADEs occurred later in the treatment course for patients treated with daptomycin (P<·01). Rates of readmission and emergency room visits were similar. CONCLUSIONS: In the OPAT setting, vancomycin use was associated with higher incidence of ADEs than daptomycin use. This finding is an important policy consideration for programs aiming to optimize outcomes and minimize cost. Careful selection of gram-positive agents for prolonged treatment is necessary to limit toxicity.
Authors: James Beardsley; Swetangini Patel; Corbin Cook; Brandi Pierce; James Johnson; Christopher Ohl; Vera Luther Journal: Hosp Pharm Date: 2020-11-06
Authors: Rachel S Britt; Mary T LaSalvia; Simi Padival; Parth Patel; Christopher McCoy; Monica V Mahoney Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2019-11-19 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Sara C Keller; Nae-Yuh Wang; Alejandra Salinas; Deborah Williams; Jennifer Townsend; Sara E Cosgrove Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Ann L N Chapman; Sanjay Patel; Carolyne Horner; Helen Green; Achyut Guleri; Sara Hedderwick; Susan Snape; Julie Statham; Elizabeth Wilson; Mark Gilchrist; R Andrew Seaton Journal: JAC Antimicrob Resist Date: 2019-08-26
Authors: Beatriz Fernández-Rubio; Paula Del Valle-Moreno; Laura Herrera-Hidalgo; Alicia Gutiérrez-Valencia; Rafael Luque-Márquez; Luis E López-Cortés; José María Gutiérrez-Urbón; Sonia Luque-Pardos; Aurora Fernández-Polo; María V Gil-Navarro Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2021-12-30