Literature DB >> 29893641

Cost-effectiveness of Endovascular Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Patient Age.

Wolfgang G Kunz1, Myriam G Hunink1, Konstantinos Dimitriadis1, Thomas Huber1, Franziska Dorn1, Felix G Meinel1, Bastian O Sabel1, Ahmed E Othman1, Maximilian F Reiser1, Birgit Ertl-Wagner1, Wieland H Sommer1, Kolja M Thierfelder1.   

Abstract

Purpose To determine the impact of patient age on the cost-effectiveness of endovascular therapy (EVT) in addition to standard care (SC) in large-vessel-occlusion stroke for patients aged 50 to 100 years in the United States. Materials and Methods A decision-analytic Markov model was used to estimate direct and indirect lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Age-dependent input parameters were obtained from the literature. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis for age at index stroke were used. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) was set to thresholds of $50 000, $100 000, and $150 000 per QALY. The study applied a U.S. setting for health care and societal perspectives. Incremental costs and effectiveness were derived from deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Acceptability rates at different WTP thresholds were determined. Results EVT+SC was the dominant strategy in patients aged 50 to 79 years. The highest incremental effectiveness (2.61 QALYs) and cost-savings (health care perspective, $99 555; societal perspective, $146 385) were obtained in 50-year-old patients. In octogenarians (80-89 years), EVT+SC led to incremental QALYs at incremental costs with acceptability rates of more than 85%, more than 99%, and more than 99% at a WTP of $50 000, $100 000, and $150 000 per QALY, respectively. In nonagenarians (90-99 years), acceptability rates at a WTP of $50 000 per QALY dropped but stayed higher than 85% and higher than 95% at thresholds of $100 000 and $150 000 per QALY. Conclusion Using contemporary willingness-to-pay thresholds in the United States, endovascular therapy in addition to standard care reduces lifetime costs for patients up to 79 years of age and is cost-effective for patients aged 80 to 100 years. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29893641     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018172886

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  7 in total

1.  Influences of different referral modes on clinical outcomes after endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Jie Hou; Zhi-Liang Guo; Zhi-Chao Huang; Huai-Shun Wang; Shou-Jiang You; Guo-Dong Xiao
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Cost-Effectiveness Study of Initial Imaging Selection in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care.

Authors:  Gabriela Martinez; Jeffrey M Katz; Ankur Pandya; Jason J Wang; Artem Boltyenkov; Ajay Malhotra; Alvin I Mushlin; Pina C Sanelli
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.240

3.  MK-801 attenuates lesion expansion following acute brain injury in rats: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nan-Xing Yi; Long-Yun Zhou; Xiao-Yun Wang; Yong-Jia Song; Hai-Hui Han; Tian-Song Zhang; Yong-Jun Wang; Qi Shi; Hao Xu; Qian-Qian Liang; Ting Zhang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.135

4.  Cost-effectiveness of short-protocol emergency brain MRI after negative non-contrast CT for minor stroke detection.

Authors:  Daniel Puhr-Westerheide; Matthias F Froelich; Olga Solyanik; Eva Gresser; Paul Reidler; Matthias P Fabritius; Matthias Klein; Konstantin Dimitriadis; Jens Ricke; Clemens C Cyran; Wolfgang G Kunz; Philipp M Kazmierczak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-08-28       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Cost-Effectiveness of Endovascular Thrombectomy in Childhood Stroke: An Analysis of the Save ChildS Study.

Authors:  Wolfgang G Kunz; Peter B Sporns; Marios N Psychogios; Jens Fiehler; René Chapot; Franziska Dorn; Astrid Grams; Andrea Morotti; Patricia Musolino; Sarah Lee; André Kemmling; Hans Henkes; Omid Nikoubashman; Martin Wiesmann; Ulf Jensen-Kondering; Markus Möhlenbruch; Marc Schlamann; Wolfgang Marik; Stefan Schob; Christina Wendl; Bernd Turowski; Friedrich Götz; Daniel Kaiser; Konstantinos Dimitriadis; Alexandra Gersing; Thomas Liebig; Jens Ricke; Paul Reidler; Moritz Wildgruber; Sebastian Mönch
Journal:  J Stroke       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 6.967

6.  Cost-Consequence Analysis of Advanced Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke Care.

Authors:  Artem T Boltyenkov; Gabriela Martinez; Ankur Pandya; Jeffrey M Katz; Jason J Wang; Jason J Naidich; Elizabeth Rula; Pina C Sanelli
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Annual Case Volume and One-Year Mortality for Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Jun Yup Kim; Jihoon Kang; Beom Joon Kim; Seong-Eun Kim; Do Yeon Kim; Keon-Joo Lee; Hong-Kyun Park; Yong-Jin Cho; Jong-Moo Park; Kyung Bok Lee; Jae-Kwan Cha; Ji Sung Lee; Juneyoung Lee; Ki Hwa Yang; Ock Ran Hong; Ji Hyeon Shin; Jung Hyun Park; Philip B Gorelick; Hee-Joon Bae
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 5.354

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.