Literature DB >> 29893472

Portable Pocket colposcopy performs comparably to standard-of-care clinical colposcopy using acetic acid and Lugol's iodine as contrast mediators: an investigational study in Peru.

J L Mueller1, C T Lam1,2, D Dahl2, M N Asiedu1, M S Krieger1, Y Bellido-Fuentes3, M Kellish1, J Peters1, A Erkanli4, E J Ortiz2, L C Muasher5, P T Taylor5,6, J W Schmitt2,5, G Venegas3, N Ramanujam1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to develop a tele-colposcopy platform for primary-care clinics to improve screening sensitivity and access. Specifically, we developed a low-cost, portable Pocket colposcope and evaluated its performance in a tertiary healthcare centre in Peru. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Images of the cervix were captured with a standard-of-care and Pocket colposcope at la Liga Contra el Cáncer in Lima, Peru. POPULATION: Two hundred Peruvian women with abnormal cytology and/or human papillomavirus positivity were enrolled.
METHODS: Images were collected using acetic acid and Lugol's iodine as contrast agents. Biopsies were taken as per standard-of-care procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: After passing quality review, images from 129 women were sent to four physicians who provided a diagnosis for each image.
RESULTS: Physician interpretation of images from the two colposcopes agreed 83.1% of the time. The average sensitivity and specificity of physician interpretation compared with pathology was similar for the Pocket (sensitivity = 71.2%, specificity = 57.5%) and standard-of-care (sensitivity = 79.8%, specificity = 56.6%) colposcopes. When compared with a previous study where only acetic acid was applied to the cervix, results indicated that adding Lugol's iodine as a secondary contrast agent improved the percent agreement between colposcopes for all pathological categories by up to 8.9% and the sensitivity and specificity of physician interpretation compared with pathology by over 6.0 and 9.0%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The Pocket colposcope performance was similar to that of a standard-of-care colposcope when used to identify precancerous and cancerous lesions using acetic acid and Lugol's iodine during colposcopy examinations in Peru. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: The Pocket colposcope performance was similar to that of a standard-of-care colposcope when identifying cervical lesions.
© 2018 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical; cervical cancer; diagnostic imaging; primary health care; squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix; technology; uterine cervical diseases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29893472      PMCID: PMC6115285          DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  32 in total

1.  Analysis of acetic acid-induced whitening of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.

Authors:  B W Pogue; H B Kaufman; A Zelenchuk; W Harper; G C Burke; E E Burke; D M Harper
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  International Image Concordance Study to Compare a Point-of-Care Tampon Colposcope With a Standard-of-Care Colposcope.

Authors:  Jenna L Mueller; Elizabeth Asma; Christopher T Lam; Marlee S Krieger; Jennifer E Gallagher; Alaattin Erkanli; Roopa Hariprasad; J S Malliga; Lisa C Muasher; Bariki Mchome; Olola Oneko; Peyton Taylor; Gino Venegas; Anthony Wanyoro; Ravi Mehrotra; John W Schmitt; Nimmi Ramanujam
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Colposcopes: a critical review.

Authors:  D G Ferris; W A Willner; J J Ho
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Angiogenesis in squamous cell carcinoma in situ and microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Authors:  K Smith-McCune
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Cervical Cancer Screening in Cameroon: Interobserver Agreement on the Interpretation of Digital Cervicography Results.

Authors:  Simon Manga; Groesbeck Parham; Nkoum Benjamin; Kathleen Nulah; Lisa Kennedy Sheldon; Edith Welty; Javier Gordon Ogembo; Leslie Bradford; Zacharie Sando; Ray Shields; Thomas Welty
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Diane Solomon; Herschel W Lawson; Maureen Killackey; Shalini L Kulasingam; Joanna Cain; Francisco A R Garcia; Ann T Moriarty; Alan G Waxman; David C Wilbur; Nicolas Wentzensen; Levi S Downs; Mark Spitzer; Anna-Barbara Moscicki; Eduardo L Franco; Mark H Stoler; Mark Schiffman; Philip E Castle; Evan R Myers
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Visual inspection with acetic acid for cervical cancer screening outside of low-resource settings.

Authors:  Jose Jeronimo; Orlando Morales; Jorge Horna; José Pariona; Javier Manrique; Jorge Rubiños; Rina Takahashi
Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica       Date:  2005-01

8.  Perceived barriers and benefits to cervical cancer screening in Latin America.

Authors:  I Agurto; A Bishop; G Sánchez; Z Betancourt; S Robles
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 9.  Cervical cancer: the sub-Saharan African perspective.

Authors:  Rose I Anorlu
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2008-11

10.  Barriers to cervical cancer screening in Mulanje, Malawi: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Victoria K Fort; Mary Sue Makin; Aaron J Siegler; Kevin Ault; Roger Rochat
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 2.711

View more
  11 in total

1.  Development of Algorithms for Automated Detection of Cervical Pre-Cancers With a Low-Cost, Point-of-Care, Pocket Colposcope.

Authors:  Mercy Nyamewaa Asiedu; Anish Simhal; Usamah Chaudhary; Jenna L Mueller; Christopher T Lam; John W Schmitt; Gino Venegas; Guillermo Sapiro; Nimmi Ramanujam
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Inform the Design of the Mobile Inspección Visual con Ácido Acético System: Mixed Methods Case Study.

Authors:  Hadley Woodruff Reid; Rae Jean Proeschold-Bell; Christina Makarushka; Katherine Dayllan Melgar Vega; Megan Huchko; Jose Jeronimo; Lavanya Vasudevan
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-06-23

3.  High-resolution disease maps for cancer control in low-resource settings: A spatial analysis of cervical cancer incidence in Kampala, Uganda.

Authors:  Kirsten Beyer; Simon Kasasa; Ronald Anguzu; Robert Lukande; Sarah Nambooze; Phoebe M Amulen; Yuhong Zhou; Brendah Nansereko; Courtney Jankowski; Tonny Oyana; Danielle Savino; Kavanya Feustel; Henry Wabinga
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2022-04-23       Impact factor: 4.413

4.  Comparative Study of Smart Scope® Visual Screening Test with Naked Eye Visual Screening and Pap Test.

Authors:  Veena Rahatgaonkar; Pooja Uchale; Gauri Oka
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 5.  Policy Considerations to Promote Equitable Cervical Cancer Screening and Treatment in Peru.

Authors:  Andrea Thoumi; Sarah J Bond; Mary Elizabeth Dotson; Marlee Krieger; Patricia J Garcia; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  Ann Glob Health       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 2.462

6.  A systematic review of handheld tools in lieu of colposcopy for cervical neoplasia and female genital schistosomiasis.

Authors:  Solrun Søfteland; Motshedisi Hannah Sebitloane; Myra Taylor; Borghild Barth Roald; Sigve Holmen; Hashini Nilushika Galappaththi-Arachchige; Svein Gunnar Gundersen; Eyrun Floerecke Kjetland
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 3.561

Review 7.  A Framework for Cervical Cancer Elimination in Low-and-Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review and Roadmap for Interventions and Research Priorities.

Authors:  Michelle B Shin; Gui Liu; Nelly Mugo; Patricia J Garcia; Darcy W Rao; Cara J Bayer; Linda O Eckert; Leeya F Pinder; Judith N Wasserheit; Ruanne V Barnabas
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-07-01

8.  Screening test accuracy of portable devices that can be used to perform colposcopy for detecting CIN2+ in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Katayoun Taghavi; Eliane Rohner; Partha Basu; Nicola Low; Anne Rutjes; Julia Bohlius
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  A novel speculum-free imaging strategy for visualization of the internal female lower reproductive system.

Authors:  Mercy N Asiedu; Júlia S Agudogo; Mary E Dotson; Erica Skerrett; Marlee S Krieger; Christopher T Lam; Doris Agyei; Juliet Amewu; Kwaku Asah-Opoku; Megan Huchko; John W Schmitt; Ali Samba; Emmanuel Srofenyoh; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Integration of cervical cancer screening into HIV/AIDS care in low-income countries: a moral imperative.

Authors:  Chemtai Mungo; Emily Barker; Magdalene Randa; Jeniffer Ambaka; Cirilus Ogollah Osongo
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-05-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.