AIMS: The diagnosis of cutaneous γδ T-cell lymphoma (GDTCL) requires the identification of γδ chains of the T-cell receptor (TCR). Our aim in this study was, by using a new monoclonal antibody (mAb) against TCRδ, to evaluate TCRδ expression in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) skin tissue from TCRγ+ cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and to assess TCRδ expression within a spectrum of other cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders (CLPDs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve cases (10 patients) with TCRγ+ CTCL and 132 additional CLPD cases (127 patients) were examined, including mycosis fungoides (MF) (n = 60), cutaneous GDTCL (n = 15), subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) (n = 11), and CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) (n = 24). Clone H-41 against TCRδ was used on a Leica Bond-3 automated stainer to label FFPE slides. H-41 immunostaining was graded as percentage infiltrate: high (50-100%), moderate (10-49%), and low (0-9%). In TCRγ+ tumours, 12 of 12 (100%) patients showed TCRδ expression comparable to TCRγ expression. No (0%) TCRγ+ cases were negative for TCRδ. In all CLPDs, TCRδ expression was as follows: GDTCL, 16 of 20 cases (14 of 15 patients) high, two moderate, and two low; MF, 0 of 60 cases high, nine moderate, and 51 low; CD30+ LPD, one of 24 cases high, two moderate, and 21 low; and SPTCL, 0 of 11 cases (0 of 9 patients) high, two moderate, and two low. Three MF-like cases and one SPTCL-like case showed high expression; the remainder showed low expression. CONCLUSIONS: mAb H-41 against TCRδ matches TCRγ in immunostaining FFPE tissues from GDTCL, supporting H-41 as a replacement for mAb γ3.20. TCRδ expression in our study suggests that the true occurrence of γδ+ non-GDTCL CTCL/CLPD may be lower than suggested by the recent literature.
AIMS: The diagnosis of cutaneous γδ T-cell lymphoma (GDTCL) requires the identification of γδ chains of the T-cell receptor (TCR). Our aim in this study was, by using a new monoclonal antibody (mAb) against TCRδ, to evaluate TCRδ expression in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) skin tissue from TCRγ+ cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), and to assess TCRδ expression within a spectrum of other cutaneous lymphoproliferative disorders (CLPDs). METHODS AND RESULTS: Twelve cases (10 patients) with TCRγ+ CTCL and 132 additional CLPD cases (127 patients) were examined, including mycosis fungoides (MF) (n = 60), cutaneous GDTCL (n = 15), subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL) (n = 11), and CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorder (LPD) (n = 24). Clone H-41 against TCRδ was used on a Leica Bond-3 automated stainer to label FFPE slides. H-41 immunostaining was graded as percentage infiltrate: high (50-100%), moderate (10-49%), and low (0-9%). In TCRγ+ tumours, 12 of 12 (100%) patients showed TCRδ expression comparable to TCRγ expression. No (0%) TCRγ+ cases were negative for TCRδ. In all CLPDs, TCRδ expression was as follows: GDTCL, 16 of 20 cases (14 of 15 patients) high, two moderate, and two low; MF, 0 of 60 cases high, nine moderate, and 51 low; CD30+ LPD, one of 24 cases high, two moderate, and 21 low; and SPTCL, 0 of 11 cases (0 of 9 patients) high, two moderate, and two low. Three MF-like cases and one SPTCL-like case showed high expression; the remainder showed low expression. CONCLUSIONS: mAb H-41 against TCRδ matches TCRγ in immunostaining FFPE tissues from GDTCL, supporting H-41 as a replacement for mAb γ3.20. TCRδ expression in our study suggests that the true occurrence of γδ+ non-GDTCLCTCL/CLPD may be lower than suggested by the recent literature.
Authors: Steven H Swerdlow; Elias Campo; Stefano A Pileri; Nancy Lee Harris; Harald Stein; Reiner Siebert; Ranjana Advani; Michele Ghielmini; Gilles A Salles; Andrew D Zelenetz; Elaine S Jaffe Journal: Blood Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Joan Guitart; M Estela Martinez-Escala; Antonio Subtil; Madeleine Duvic; Melissa P Pulitzer; Elise A Olsen; Ellen Kim; Alain H Rook; Sara S Samimi; Gary S Wood; Michael Girardi; Jacqueline Junkins-Hopkins; Doina S Ivan; M Angelica Selim; Kimberly A Sable; Pooja Virmani; Laura B Pincus; Michael T Tetzlaff; Jinah Kim; Youn H Kim Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Rein Willemze; Elaine S Jaffe; Günter Burg; Lorenzo Cerroni; Emilio Berti; Steven H Swerdlow; Elisabeth Ralfkiaer; Sergio Chimenti; José L Diaz-Perez; Lyn M Duncan; Florent Grange; Nancy Lee Harris; Werner Kempf; Helmut Kerl; Michael Kurrer; Robert Knobler; Nicola Pimpinelli; Christian Sander; Marco Santucci; Wolfram Sterry; Maarten H Vermeer; Janine Wechsler; Sean Whittaker; Chris J L M Meijer Journal: Blood Date: 2005-02-03 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Socorro Maria Rodríguez-Pinilla; Pablo L Ortiz-Romero; Verónica Monsalvez; Itziar Eraña Tomás; Manuel Almagro; Amparo Sevilla; Gloria Camacho; María Isabel Longo; Águeda Pulpillo; Julio Alexander Diaz-Pérez; Santiago Montes-Moreno; Yolanda Castro; Begoña Echevarría; Izaskun Trébol; Carlos Gonzalez; Lydia Sánchez; Alberto Puime Otín; Luis Requena; Jose L Rodríguez-Peralto; Lorenzo Cerroni; Miguel Ángel Piris Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: Michele Roullet; Shereen M F Gheith; Joanne Mauger; Jacqueline M Junkins-Hopkins; John K Choi Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: V Groh; S Porcelli; M Fabbi; L L Lanier; L J Picker; T Anderson; R A Warnke; A K Bhan; J L Strominger; M B Brenner Journal: J Exp Med Date: 1989-04-01 Impact factor: 14.307
Authors: Ibrahim N Muhsen; Riad El Fakih; Mehdi Hamadani; Hillard M Lazarus; Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja; Mahmoud Aljurf Journal: Clin Hematol Int Date: 2022-06-22