Literature DB >> 29892609

Data on vessel wall thickness measurements of intracranial arteries derived from human circle of Willis specimens.

Anita A Harteveld1, Nerissa P Denswil2, Wim Van Hecke3, Hugo J Kuijf4, Aryan Vink3, Wim G M Spliet3, Mat J Daemen2, Peter R Luijten1, Jaco J M Zwanenburg1, Jeroen Hendrikse1, Anja G van der Kolk1.   

Abstract

In this article, we report data on vessel wall thickness parameters derived from different arterial segments of the circle of Willis and its primary branches in patients with and without cerebrovascular disease. Also data on inter-rater reliability and agreement of the derived vessel wall parameters are reported. For further interpretation and discussion please refer to the research article "ex vivo vessel wall thickness measurements of the human circle of Willis using 7T MRI" (Harteveld et al., in press) [1].

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29892609      PMCID: PMC5992953          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.04.116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications Table

Value of the data

This data provides ex vivo vessel wall thickness measurement values of the main arteries of the circle of Willis and its primary branches of patients with and without cerebrovascular disease, using 7T MRI. Inter-rater reliability and agreement of vessel wall thickness measurements using MRI compared to histology are provided. The data presented would be useful as MRI-based reference values for vessel wall thickness parameters of intracranial arteries, and may stimulate future research investigating intracranial vessel wall thickness in a larger patient population with different risk factors and cerebrovascular disease burden.

Data

Segment averages of thickness measurements from all analyzed circle of Willis specimens are presented in Table 1. Mean vessel wall thickness MRI measurements over entire vessel segments are shown for each individual patient in Fig. 1. Inter-rater reliability and agreement of parameters derived from delineated vessel wall boundaries on MR images and histological sections are provided in Table 2.
Table 1

MR imaging measurements of vessel wall thickness parameters for different arterial segments of the CoW in n = 10 patients with and without cerebrovascular disease.

SegmentLumen area (mm2)Total vessel area (mm2)Wall area (mm2)Vessel wall thickness (mm)
Normalized wall index
MeanMinimumMaximum
Anterior cerebral arteryA10.84 (0.47)2.92 (0.97)2.07 (0.56)0.45 (0.06)0.31 (0.04)0.52 (0.09)0.73 (0.09)
A20.75 (0.43)2.95 (0.88)2.20 (0.56)0.49 (0.08)0.32 (0.05)0.54 (0.13)0.75 (0.07)
Internal carotid artery3.44 (1.86)8.90 (2.93)5.46 (1.46)0.66 (0.12)0.42 (0.09)0.86 (0.21)0.64 (0.12)
Middle cerebral artery1.88 (1.01)5.62 (1.63)3.74 (0.89)0.58 (0.11)0.35 (0.07)0.78 (0.22)0.69 (0.12)
Posterior cerebral artery1.07 (0.47)3.70 (1.05)2.63 (0.70)0.51 (0.08)0.34 (0.06)0.61 (0.12)0.72 (0.07)
Basilar arteryproximal2.41 (1.01)6.79 (1.38)4.38 (1.12)0.61 (0.16)0.38 (0.11)0.73 (0.26)0.65 (0.11)
distal1.94 (1.00)5.37 (1.90)3.43 (1.14)0.53 (0.12)0.35 (0.08)0.61 (0.20)0.65 (0.10)
Vertebral artery1.54 (0.97)4.74 (1.93)3.20 (1.15)0.54 (0.11)0.36 (0.07)0.59 (0.17)0.69 (0.09)

Values are given as mean (standard deviation).

For each vessel segment the measurements were averaged over the fixed length, and left and right were taken together (if applicable).

Fig. 1

Mean vessel wall thickness (MVWT) MRI measurements over the fixed length of each analyzed vessel segment from the asymptomatic (graphs on the left) and symptomatic (graphs on the right) patients. For the basilar artery, the entire segment is shown. Each line color represents a different CoW specimen, where the markers indicate whether the vessel segment is located on the right (not filled) or left (filled). The distance represents the locations along the arterial segments from proximal to distal.

Table 2

Inter-rater reliability and agreement of the derived vessel wall parameters.

ICCa (95% CI)Mean difference (95% LoA)
HistologyTotal vessel area (mm2)1.000 (1.000–1.000)0.02 (− 0.01 to 0.06)
Lumen area (mm2)1.000 (0.999–1.000)0.01 (− 0.09 to 0.11)
Wall area (mm2)1.000 (0.999–1.000)0.06 (− 0.06 to 0.17)
Vessel wall thickness (mm)
mean0.999 (0.996–1.000)0.01 (− 0.01 to 0.04)
minimum0.996 (0.984–0.999)0.01 (− 0.01 to 0.03)
maximum0.996 (0.982–0.999)0.06 (− 0.06 to 0.18)
Normalized wall index1.000 (0.999–1.000)0.01 (− 0.01 to 0.02)









MRITotal vessel area (mm2)0.993 (0.861–0.999)− 0.46 (− 1.17 to 0.24)
Lumen area (mm2)0.999 (0.992–1.000)− 0.10 (− 0.32 to 0.12)
Wall area (mm2)0.985 (0.814–0.997)− 0.36 (− 1.01 to 0.29)
Vessel wall thickness (mm)
mean0.989 (0.929–0.998)− 0.03 (− 0.11 to 0.04)
minimum0.849 (0.434–0.962)− 0.02 (− 0.09 to 0.06)
maximum0.992 (0.970–0.998)− 0.04 (− 0.20 to 0.13)
Normalized wall index0.995 (0.964–0.999)− 0.02 (− 0.05 to 0.02)

CI: confidence interval; ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient; LoA: limits of agreement.

Two-way mixed model with absolute agreement.

MR imaging measurements of vessel wall thickness parameters for different arterial segments of the CoW in n = 10 patients with and without cerebrovascular disease. Values are given as mean (standard deviation). For each vessel segment the measurements were averaged over the fixed length, and left and right were taken together (if applicable). Mean vessel wall thickness (MVWT) MRI measurements over the fixed length of each analyzed vessel segment from the asymptomatic (graphs on the left) and symptomatic (graphs on the right) patients. For the basilar artery, the entire segment is shown. Each line color represents a different CoW specimen, where the markers indicate whether the vessel segment is located on the right (not filled) or left (filled). The distance represents the locations along the arterial segments from proximal to distal. Inter-rater reliability and agreement of the derived vessel wall parameters. CI: confidence interval; ICC: intraclass correlation coefficient; LoA: limits of agreement. Two-way mixed model with absolute agreement.

Experimental design, materials and methods

Specimens

In total 15 human circle of Willis specimens were used for data acquisition. Five specimens (from 5 patients) were used for evaluation of inter-rater reliability and agreement (3 male; mean age 66.2 years; range 42–92 years). The other 10 specimens from patients with (n = 5) and without (n = 5) cerebrovascular disease were used for vessel wall thickness measurements of the major arterial segments of the circle of Willis using MRI. Demographic and clinical data of these specimens are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3

Baseline characteristics of donor patients used for vessel wall thickness measurements over the entire length of the major arterial segments of the CoW.

SubjectSex (m/f)Age (years)Clinical history cerebrovascular diseaseCause of deathLocation cerebral ischemia
1m77Ischemic strokeIschemic strokeLeft medial, right parietal cortex
2f75Ischemic strokeIntraparenchymal hemorrhageLeft middle cerebral artery territory
3f75Ischemic strokeBlood loss from hemorrhagic gastritis combined with heart failureRight middle cerebral artery territory
4m80TIABilateral pneumoniaLeft hemisphere
5f80Ischemic stroke + TIAsIntraparenchymal hemorrhageUnknown
6m84Subdural & intraparenchymal hemorrhage after traumaN/A
7f81Hypovolemic shock caused by intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal bleedingN/A
8f71Advanced metastatic thyroid cancerN/A
9f70Respiratory failure after (possible) postoperative (ileus) aspirationN/A
10m66Brain tumor (glioblastoma multiforme)N/A
Baseline characteristics of donor patients used for vessel wall thickness measurements over the entire length of the major arterial segments of the CoW.

MR imaging

Imaging was performed at room temperature on a 7T whole body system (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands), with an ultra-high resolution 3D T1-weighted sequence. Details regarding the applied scan parameters are described in Ref. [1].

Histological processing

Samples taken from different marked locations of each circle of Willis specimen that were used for evaluation of inter-rater reliability and agreement were histologically processed using an in-house developed protocol [2].

Vessel wall thickness analysis

Vessel wall thickness parameters included: lumen area (LA), total vessel area (TVA), wall area (WA; TVA-LA), wall thickness (mean, minimum, and maximum), and normalized wall index (WA/TVA). Mean vessel wall thickness was calculated based on the vessel areas [3] (Fig. 2). Vessel wall thickness parameters were calculated from manually traced vessel boundary contours by dedicated software programs (MRI data: CAAS MRA, Pie Medical Imaging, the Netherlands; Histological data: MeVisLab, MeVis Medical Solutions, Germany).
Fig. 2

Schematic clarification of the method used for calculation of mean vessel wall thickness based on the vessel areas [3]. The mean vessel wall thickness is calculated by taking the difference between the radius of a circle with area equal to that enclosed by the outer wall boundary (rtotal vessel) and the radius of a circle with area equal to that enclosed by the luminal boundary (rlumen). Outer wall and luminal boundary are indicated by the red and green line, respectively.

Schematic clarification of the method used for calculation of mean vessel wall thickness based on the vessel areas [3]. The mean vessel wall thickness is calculated by taking the difference between the radius of a circle with area equal to that enclosed by the outer wall boundary (rtotal vessel) and the radius of a circle with area equal to that enclosed by the luminal boundary (rlumen). Outer wall and luminal boundary are indicated by the red and green line, respectively. Inter-rater reliability and agreement of calculated vessel wall parameters were assessed using vessel wall boundaries drawn by two raters in the same set of histological sections and their matching MRI slices (n = 10 samples; randomly selected from all samples obtained from 5 specimens).
Subject areaMedicine
More specific subject areaRadiology, pathology
Type of dataTables, figures
How data was acquiredMRI data acquisition: 7T whole-body system (Philips Healthcare, the Netherlands); MRI data analysis: CAAS MRA software program (Pie Medical Imaging, the Netherlands); Histological data acquisition: slide scanner with DotSlide software (Olympus, Japan); Histological data analysis: MeVisLab software program (MeVis Medical Solutions, Germany).
Data formatAnalyzed
Experimental factorsRaw MRI data was processed offline using dedicated vascular analysis software. After MR imaging, samples were taken from different arterial segments and histologically processed to enable assessment of histological sections.
Experimental featuresMRI measurements of vessel wall thickness parameters for different intracranial arteries; Inter-rater reliability and agreement of derived vessel wall parameters from MRI and histological data.
Data source locationUtrecht, Netherlands
Data accessibilityData is within this article
  3 in total

1.  Agreement between methods of measurement of mean aortic wall thickness by MRI.

Authors:  Eric B Rosero; Ronald M Peshock; Amit Khera; G Patrick Clagett; Hao Lo; Carlos Timaran
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Imaging the intracranial atherosclerotic vessel wall using 7T MRI: initial comparison with histopathology.

Authors:  A G van der Kolk; J J M Zwanenburg; N P Denswil; A Vink; W G M Spliet; M J A P Daemen; F Visser; D W J Klomp; P R Luijten; J Hendrikse
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Ex vivo vessel wall thickness measurements of the human circle of Willis using 7T MRI.

Authors:  Anita A Harteveld; Nerissa P Denswil; Wim Van Hecke; Hugo J Kuijf; Aryan Vink; Wim G M Spliet; Mat J Daemen; Peter R Luijten; Jaco J M Zwanenburg; Jeroen Hendrikse; Anja G van der Kolk
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 5.162

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Vessel wall and lumen characteristics with age in healthy participants using 3T intracranial vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Petrice M Cogswell; Sarah K Lants; L Taylor Davis; Manus J Donahue
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Incorporation of vasculature in a head injury model lowers local mechanical strains in dynamic impact.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Songbai Ji
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Motion-compensated 3D turbo spin-echo for more robust MR intracranial vessel wall imaging.

Authors:  Zhehao Hu; Andre van der Kouwe; Fei Han; Jiayu Xiao; Junzhou Chen; Hui Han; Xiaoming Bi; Debiao Li; Zhaoyang Fan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.737

4.  Low oxygen microenvironment and cardiovascular remodeling: Role of dual L/N.type Ca2+ channel blocker.

Authors:  Shrilaxmi Bagali; Savitri M Nerune; R Chandramouli Reddy; Saeed M Yendigeri; Bheemshetty S Patil; Akram A Naikwadi; Raghavendra V Kulkarni; Kusal K Das
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.200

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.