| Literature DB >> 29892579 |
Marcello Zaia Oliveira1, Mauro Batista Albano1, Guilherme Augusto Stirma1, Mario Massatomo Namba1, Leandro Vidigal1, Luiz Antonio Munhoz da Cunha1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To analyze, from the immunohistochemical perspective, the effects of hyaluronic acid of different molecular weights in an experimental model of osteoarthritis in rabbits.Entities:
Keywords: Experimental model of osteoarthritis; Hyaluronic acid; Immunohistochemistry; Osteoarthritis
Year: 2018 PMID: 29892579 PMCID: PMC5993877 DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2018.03.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Bras Ortop ISSN: 2255-4971
Fig. 1Photomicrograph of a histological section of immunomodulated articular cartilage of MMP 3 – Synvisc®.
Fig. 2Photomicrograph of a histological section of immunomodulated articular cartilage of MMP 3 – Placebo.
Comparison of the P group vs. the S group for MMP13.
| S MMP13 | P MMP13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1.491 | 2.931 |
| Variance | 0.124832222 | 0.35641 |
| Observations | 10 | 10 |
| Mean difference hypothesis | 0 | |
| gL | 15 | |
| −6.564182248 | ||
| 4.48725E−06 | ||
| Critical one-tailed | 1.753050356 | |
| 8.9745E−06 | ||
| Critical two-tailed | 2.131449546 |
T test, two samples with unequal variances.
Comparison of the P group vs. the PR group for MMP13.
| P MMP13 | PR MMP13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | 2.931 | 1.414 |
| Variance | 0.35641 | 0.187671111 |
| Observations | 10 | 10 |
| Mean difference hypothesis | 0 | |
| gL | 16 | |
| 6.503599012 | ||
| 3.6375E−06 | ||
| Critical one-tailed | 1.745883676 | |
| 7.275E−06 | ||
| Critical two-tailed | 2.119905299 |
T test, two samples with unequal variances.
Comparison of the P group vs. the S group for TIMP 1.
| S TIMP1 | P TIMP1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | 3.227 | 1.017 |
| Variance | 0.376467778 | 0.091734444 |
| Observations | 10 | 10 |
| Mean difference hypothesis | 0 | |
| gL | 13 | |
| 10.21352223 | ||
| 7.03657E−08 | ||
| Critical one-tailed | 1.770933396 | |
| 1.40731E−07 | ||
| Critical two-tailed | 2.160368656 |
T test, two samples with unequal variances.
Comparison of the P group vs. the PR group for TIMP 1.
| P TIMP1 | PR TIMP1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | 1.017 | 3.032 |
| Variance | 0.091734444 | 0.189884444 |
| Observations | 10 | 10 |
| Mean difference hypothesis | 0 | |
| gL | 16 | |
| −12.00726678 | ||
| 1.01975E−09 | ||
| Critical one-tailed | 1.745883676 | |
| 2.0395E−09 | ||
| Critical two-tailed | 2.119905299 |
T test, two samples with unequal variances.
Comparison of the P group vs. the S group for TIMP 3.
| S TIMP3 | P TIMP3 | |
|---|---|---|
| 4.82 | 2.15 | |
| Mean | 3.798888889 | 2.234444444 |
| Variance | 0.851136111 | 0.499002778 |
| Observations | 9 | 9 |
| Mean difference hypothesis | 0 | |
| gL | 15 | |
| 4.039170415 | ||
| 0.000535294 | ||
| Critical one-tailed | 1.753050356 | |
| 0.001070589 | ||
| Critical two-tailed | 2.131449546 |
T test, two samples with unequal variances.
Comparison of the P group vs. the PR group for TIMP 3.
| PR TIMP3 | P TIMP3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean | 3.901 | 2.14 |
| Variance | 0.860832222 | 0.631577778 |
| Observations | 10 | 10 |
| Mean difference hypothesis | 0 | |
| gL | 18 | |
| 4.558429902 | ||
| 0.000121767 | ||
| Critical one-tailed | 1.734063607 | |
| 0.000243534 | ||
| Critical two-tailed | 2.10092204 |
T test, two samples with unequal variances.
Fig. 3Intensity of MMP3 immunostaining.
Fig. 4Intensity of MMP13 immunostaining.
Fig. 5Intensity of TIMP1 immunostaining.
Fig. 6Intensity of TIMP3 immunostaining.