| Literature DB >> 29892487 |
Diaaeldin Mostafa1, Hisham Elshawaf1, M Kotb1, Abdelwahab Elkassaby1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To present our twin ventral penile skin flap technique for the management of complex long anterior urethral strictures not caused by lichen sclerosis (LS), with evaluation of surgical outcome and complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with long complex anterior urethral strictures who were all referred to Ain Shams University hospital and operated on by three reconstructive surgeons. The surgical procedure was carried out as follows: exposure of the urethra through a ventral longitudinal penile skin incision and another perineal incision; two ventral longitudinal dartos-based penile skin flaps are used for urethral augmentation as onlay flaps. Clinical data were collected in a dedicated database. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative follow-up data for each patient were recorded and analysed. A descriptive data analysis was performed.Entities:
Keywords: Anterior urethral stricture; LS, lichen sclerosis; Qmax, peak urinary flow rate; Twin penile skin flap; Urethroplasty; VIU, visual internal urethrotomy
Year: 2018 PMID: 29892487 PMCID: PMC5992783 DOI: 10.1016/j.aju.2017.12.006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arab J Urol ISSN: 2090-598X
Characteristics of the strictures in the study cohort.
| Characteristic | |
|---|---|
| Traumatic | 12 (27.9) |
| Iatrogenic | 12 (27.9) |
| Idiopathic | 11 (25.6) |
| Inflammatory | 8 (18.6) |
| Involved | 30 (69.8) |
| Not involved | 13 (30.2) |
| Recurrent | 15 (34.9) |
| Non-recurrent | 28 (65.1) |
Fig. 1Marking of the ventral incisions and flaps.
Fig. 2First onlay flap augmenting distal end of the stricture.
Fig. 3Dissection of the second flap and release incision of its pedicle.
Fig. 4Second flap is passed to perineal incision through a tunnel beneath the scrotum.
Fig. 5Suturing of the second flap starting at the proximal end of the stricture.
Fig. 6Oblique anastomosis of the two flaps.
Fig. 7Penile and perineal incisions: (a) during surgery and (b) after closure.
Patients’ characteristics before and after urethroplasty.
| Paired | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Characteristic | Mean (SD, range) | ||
| Age, years | 38.37 (10.17, 19.00–58.00) | ||
| Stricture length, cm | 17.56 (2.09, 14.00–21.00) | ||
| Preoperative | 5.12 (1.35, 0.90–7.00) | ||
| 3 months postoperatively | 20.53 (3.39, 13.00–25.00) | 29.521 | <0.001* |
| 12 months postoperatively | 20.26 (3.06, 14.00–25.00) | 31.341 | <0.001* |
| Preoperative | 30.00 (2.52, 26.00–35.00) | ||
| 3 months postoperatively | 5.56 (1.61, 3.00–8.00) | 63.855 | <0.001* |
| 12 months postoperatively | 5.60 (1.85, 3.00–8.00) | 54.925 | <0.001* |
Fig. 8Preoperative (a) and 3-months postoperative (b) retrograde urethrograms in a 50-year-old man with a severe long anterior urethral stricture.