Literature DB >> 2989229

Breast relapse following primary radiation therapy for early breast cancer. II. Detection, pathologic features and prognostic significance.

S J Schnitt, J L Connolly, A Recht, B Silver, J R Harris.   

Abstract

In order to define better the nature of breast relapse following primary radiation therapy for early-stage invasive breast cancer, we examined the clinical patterns, methods of detection, histopathology and prognosis in 25 patients. Eighty-eight percent of these relapses occurred in the vicinity of the original tumor at an average of 33 months after treatment. Twelve percent occurred in a location distinctly separate from the primary tumor area at an average of 75 months after treatment. In 14 patients breast relapse was detected by physical examination (PE) alone, in 6 patients by mammography alone and in 5 patients by both. In eight of the patients whose relapses were detected by PE alone, mammography was not performed; mammograms were negative in the other six. In 89% of the patients who presented with a new abnormality on physical examination, the recurrence consisted predominantly or exclusively of invasive carcinoma. In contrast, in all six patients who presented with only a new mammographic abnormality, the recurrence consisted predominantly or exclusively of intraductal carcinoma. Eighteen of these patients underwent salvage mastectomy, 3 were inoperable on clinical grounds and 4 refused mastectomy. Only 1 of the 18 patients who underwent mastectomy had a significant complication related to the surgery. Twenty-one of these 25 patients (84%) are alive without further recurrence up to 67 months (mean 24 months) after breast relapse. We conclude that (1) physical examination and mammography are both important for the detection of breast relapses: (2) secondary (salvage) surgery can be performed without significant complications; and (3) a breast relapse does not have the same grave prognosis as a local (chest wall) recurrence after mastectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2989229     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90242-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  5 in total

1.  [Technic of breast-saving surgery].

Authors:  F Harder; U Laffer
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1986

2.  Tumor progression- and metastasis-associated proteins identified using a model of locally recurrent rat mammary adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  D R Welch; S A McClure; P A Aeed; M J Bahner; L D Adams
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.150

3.  Imaging in situ breast carcinoma (with or without an invasive component) with technetium-99m pentavalent dimercaptosuccinic acid and technetium-99m 2-methoxy isobutyl isonitrile scintimammography.

Authors:  Vassilios Papantoniou; Spyridon Tsiouris; Ekaterini Mainta; Varvara Valotassiou; Michael Souvatzoglou; Maria Sotiropoulou; Lydia Nakopoulou; Dimitrios Lazaris; Androniki Louvrou; Maria Melissinou; Artemis Tzannetaki; Ioannis Pirmettis; John Koutsikos; Cherry Zerva
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-11-08       Impact factor: 6.466

4.  Cutaneous Metastasis vs. Isolated Skin Recurrence of Invasive Breast Carcinoma after Modified Radical Mastectomy.

Authors:  Reza Hosseinpour; Mohammad Javad Yavari Barhaghtalab
Journal:  Case Rep Dermatol Med       Date:  2021-02-16

5.  Standardized and reproducible methodology for the comprehensive and systematic assessment of surgical resection margins during breast-conserving surgery for invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Rafael E Jimenez; Wenle P Wang; Ronald X Xu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.