Literature DB >> 29892049

Tunable multiband directional electromagnetic scattering from spoof Mie resonant structure.

Hong-Wei Wu1,2, Hua-Jun Chen1, Hua-Feng Xu1, Ren-Hao Fan2, Yang Li3.   

Abstract

We demonstrate that directional electromagnetic scattering can be realized in an artificial Mie resonant structure that supports electric and magnetic dipole modes simultaneously. The directivity of the far-field radiation pattern can be switched by changing wavelength of the incident light as well as tailoring the geometric parameters of the structure. In addition, we further design a quasiperiodic spoof Mie resonant structure by alternately inserting two materials into the slits. The results show that multi-band directional light scattering is realized by exciting multiple electric and magnetic dipole modes with different frequencies in the quasiperiodic structure. The presented design concept is suitable for microwave to terahertz region and can be applied to various advanced optical devices, such as antenna, metamaterial and metasurface.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29892049      PMCID: PMC5995885          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27268-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Directional electromagnetic scattering, which can be induced by interference between the electric and magnetic dipolar resonances, plays a key role in many fundamental and applied researches[1,2]. In 1983, hypothetical magneticdielectric particle exhibiting electric and magnetic dipolar resonances had been theoretically proposed by Kerker et al., which predicts the unidirectional forward or backward scattering due to the constructive interference of resonances enhancing scattering in one direction and destructive interference minimizing the scattered intensity in the opposite direction[3]. In order to obtain the directional light scattering, various metamaterials based on metallic nanostructures have been engineered to exhibit artificial magnetism along with their intrinsic electrical response in the visible and infrared regime[4-7]. However, a main drawback of using plasmonic nanostructures is the intrinsic losses, which strongly limits their practical use in directional light scattering. Fortunately, using high-index dielectric nanoparticles can avoid such limitation and exhibit both electric and magnetic dipole resonances in same particle simultaneously[8-12]. This characteristic makes high-index dielectric nanoparticles as popular choices for realizing the directional light scattering in visible frequencies. Recently, various high-index dielectric nanostructures have been theoretical and experimental investigated for directional light scattering, such as nanodisk[13], nanowire[14], nanosphere[15-17] and sphere/disk dimers[18-20]. Moreover, in order to transfer the exotic features of conventional localized surface plasmons (LSPs) to microwave and terahertz regions, Pors et al. have proposed the concept of spoof LSPs based on the textured perfect electric conductors (PECs) cylinder to mimic the metallic nanoparticles in the low frequencies regime[21]. Since then, extensive theoretical and experimental works have been performed to verify the existence of spoof LSPs in various textured metallic structures[22-28]. Recently, we also have demonstrated that a hollow metallic cylinder corrugated by periodic cut-through slits can supports the magnetic and electric dipole resonances similar to the Mie resonance in dielectric particles with a high-refractive index, as the spoof Mie resonant structure[29]. Different from the spoof LSPs supported on the solid textured metal cylinder[28], our results indicate that the magnetic dipole can be separated from the electric dipole in a 2D structure, and magnetic dipolar resonance appears at lower frequency, rather than electric resonance in both 2D and 3D structures. Compared with natural high-index dielectric particles, the artificial Mie resonant structure has a greater degree of freedom for tuning resonance properties by changing the geometry parameters including radius, slits width and filling mediums. Therefore, it may be significative to investigate the directional electromagnetic scattering from the spoof Mie resonant structure because the highly asymmetric scattering can be expediently tuned by adjusting the structure parameters. In this paper, we demonstrate that electric and magnetic resonant modes can be simultaneously excited in spoof Mie resonant structure to induce directional electromagnetic scattering at low frequency. The results show that the unidirectional scattering can be tuned by tailoring the geometric parameters of the structure. Furthermore, the electric quadrupole at higher frequency contributes significantly to the forward scattered field, leading to the enhanced directionality of forward scattering comparing with one at lower frequency obtained by interference between pure electric and magnetic dipolar resonances. In order to realize multi-band directional electromagnetic scattering, we also propose a quasiperiodic spoof Mie resonant structure by alternately inserting different dielectric materials into slits which supports multiple electric and magnetic dipolar resonance. The results indicate that multi-band directional light scattering is realized by exciting multiple electric and magnetic dipole modes with different frequencies in the quasiperiodic structure. Our results provide a potential approach for designing antenna of directional scattering in the microwave and terahertz region.

Results

Electromagnetic response of spoof Mie resonant structure

We first consider a hollow 2D PEC cylinder with periodic cut-through slits as shown in Fig. 1(a). The hollow PEC cylinder with outer radius R and inner radius r is decorated with a set of radial slits with depth h = R − r, width a, and periodicity d = 2πR/N (where N are the total number of slits). A dielectric material with a refractive index of ns is filled into the slits, and the surround of this structure is air (i.e., both regions I and III are air). It is well known that the region II can also be regarded as a metamaterial of thickness h = R − r with , ε = n2 d/a, and μ = a/d for the transverse magnetic (TM) polarized incident wave. ρ and φ are the polar coordinates as shown in Fig. 1(a). Without loss of generality, the structure parameters are chosen as N = 30, r = 0.1 R, ns = 4, and a = 0.8d unless otherwise specified in this paper. The refractive index ns = 4 of dielectric is chosen in slits in order to approach the one of silicon, then the structure can be simply seen as inserting the metal strips into hollow silicon cylinder periodically. The outer radius R is set to the unit length, and the frequency can be expressed in term of the dimensionless quantity k0 R where k0 = ω/c (ω and c are angular frequency and vacuum speed of light). The scale of whole structure is chosen in deep subwavelength scale. In order to probe the Mie resonant modes, we here consider a TM-polarized incident plane wave propagated from top to bottom along y direction. The electromagnetic responses and field distributions of this structure are calculated by using the commercial software COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS based on finite element method.
Figure 1

(a) A two-dimensional corrugated PEC hollow cylinder with periodic cut-through slits with the inner and outer radii r and R, periodicity d, and slit width a. Blue and gray regions represent the dielectric and PEC materials. (b) The calculated SCS spectrum for the textured PEC hollow cylinder. Red solid line corresponds to simulation result of textured PEC hollow cylinder and black solid line is the analytic calculation for the structure parameters N = 30, r = 0.1 R and a = 0.8 d. The refractive index of dielectric material in slits is ns = 4. Blue dash line, green dash line and pink dash line correspond to the SCS of modes m = 0, m = 1 and m = 2, respectively. (c–e) The field distributions corresponding to magnetic dipole mode, electric dipole mode and electric quadrupole mode.

(a) A two-dimensional corrugated PEC hollow cylinder with periodic cut-through slits with the inner and outer radii r and R, periodicity d, and slit width a. Blue and gray regions represent the dielectric and PEC materials. (b) The calculated SCS spectrum for the textured PEC hollow cylinder. Red solid line corresponds to simulation result of textured PEC hollow cylinder and black solid line is the analytic calculation for the structure parameters N = 30, r = 0.1 R and a = 0.8 d. The refractive index of dielectric material in slits is ns = 4. Blue dash line, green dash line and pink dash line correspond to the SCS of modes m = 0, m = 1 and m = 2, respectively. (c–e) The field distributions corresponding to magnetic dipole mode, electric dipole mode and electric quadrupole mode. The electromagnetic response of our structure with negligible absorptions can be accurately described by the scattering cross section (SCS). Figure 1(b) shows the normalized SCS as a function of the dimensionless quantity k0 R for the spoof Mie resonant structure with periodic slits. The SCS is normalized to the geometric cross section of the structure. We first give the total SCS (red solid line) of the structure based on numerical calculation in Fig. 1(b). We can find that three resonant peaks present in the SCS spectrum. In order to confirm the identities of these resonant peaks, the near field distributions corresponding to three resonant peaks in the SCS spectrum from left to right are shown in Fig. 1(c–e). It is obvious that three resonant peaks correspond to the magnetic dipole mode, electric dipole mode and electric quadrupole mode from left to right, respectively. Furthermore, in order to gain a deeper insight into the magnetic and electric resonant modes, we present an effective medium theoretical model for the analytical description of our structure by employing the modal expansion technique[21]. In the limit of a < d << λ0, the structure can be treated as a homogeneous and anisotropy metamaterial with ε = −∞, ε = n2 d/a, and μz = a/d in region II of Fig. 1(a) for the TM-polarized incident light. Inside regions I and III, Maxwell’s equations can be decomposed into the free-space Helmholtz’s equation for Hz component. Solving the second order differential equations, the Hz is given by considering the finite energy in region I and the Sommerfield radiation conditions in region III, which are shown as:where Jm and are the Bessel and Hankel functions of first kind, respectively, and Am and Dm are complex constants. m is an integer quantifying the orbital angular momentum of the mode in the regions I and III, respectively. In the metamaterial of region II, the magnetic field can be simply written as[30]:where Ym is the Bessel function of the second kind, Bm and Cm are complex constants. After matching boundary conditions on H and E at inner and outer boundaries (ρ = r, ρ = R), we can give the analytic expression of the SCS as:the complex constant D can be written as:where p = J1(k0nsR) − MY1(k0nsR), q = J0(k0nsR) − MY0(k0nsR) and M = [J′m(k0r) J0(k0nsr)/Jm(k0r) + a J1(k0nsr)/(nsd)]/[J′m(k0r) Y0(k0nsr)/Jm(k0r) + a Y1(k0nsr)/(ns d)]. J0 and J1 (Y0 and Y1) being the zero- and first- order Bessel functions of first (second) kind, respectively. In Fig. 1(b), the analytical normalized total SCS is shown with black solid curve. Compared with red solid line and black solid line, we can find that they exhibit the similar spectra features, except the magnitude of peak corresponding to magnetic dipole mode. The difference between simulative SCS and analytical SCS at magnetic dipole resonance may be from the selected value of ε and boundary settings in simulation. It is well known that m = 0, m = 1, and m = 2 in Eq. (4) respectively correspond to magnetic dipole, electric dipole and electric quadrupole[29], then three peaks in analytical SCS can be identified by calculating the SCS of individual resonance mode as shown in blue dash, green dash, and pink dash lines in Fig. 1(b), respectively.

Directional scattering induced from periodic spoof Mie resonant structure

In the following, we will discuss the directional scattering from the designed structure based on these resonant modes demonstrated in Fig. 1(b). Figure 2(a) shows scattering properties of the structure in free space calculated by numerical simulation. The structure is excited by a plane wave from top and the scattering into the upper (backward) or lower (forward) semicircles as shown in the inset of Fig. 2(a). In Fig. 2(a), the blue and red solid lines indicate the forward and backward scattering cross sections respectively. The black solid line is the forward-to-backward (F/B) ratio. Then, we can find that there are three well-defined spectral ranges with different scattering properties. Firstly, in the spectral range with k0R < 0.56π/3, the far-field scattering is dominated by the forward scattering. Particularly, the backward scattering is almost zero and the F/B ratio is maximum value at k0R = 0.48π/3. In order to verify this conclusion, we calculate the angular scattering diagram in Fig. 2(b) denoted as “1” corresponding to that in Fig. 2(a). It is obvious that the scattering light is completely transformed into forward scattering and barely no backward scattering. At the location k0R = 0.56π/3 denoted by vertical dotted line “2”, the forward scattering equals to backward scattering and F/B = 1. We can confirm that this location corresponds to the magnetic dipolar resonance from Fig. 1(b) and the far-field pattern denoted as “2” in Fig. 2(b). Next, in the second spectral range 0.56π/3 < k0R < 0.696π/3, the backward scattering is dominant and the F/B < 1. It is not difficult to see that the minimum value of F/B ratio can be obtained for k0R = 0.62π/3. From the far field scattering denoted as “3” in Fig. 2(b), we can see that the backward scattering is significantly enhanced while the forward scattering is considerably suppressed. The physical mechanism behind the directional scattering corresponding to k0R = 0.48π/3 and 0.62π/3 in the first and second spectral range is the first and second Kerker condition described in ref.[3] because the contribution of electric quadrupole is a negligible quantity in these ranges. The symmetrical scattering in forward and backward direction occur at k0R = 0.696π/3 corresponding to the electric dipolar resonance as can be seen in “4” of Fig. 2(b). However, in the third spectral range with 0.696π/3 < k0R < 0.83π/3, the maximum value of F/B ratio is greater than one of the first spectral range at k0R = 0.76π/3, and the far field is also plotted in Fig. 2(b) denoted as “5”. The result indicates that the scattering light from the spoof Mie resonant structure with this frequency is shaped into the forward direction and no backward scattering. While the reason of this zero-backward scattering is the mutual interference among the magnetic dipole, electric dipole and electric quadrupole described as general Kerker condition (p − m/c + ik0Q/6 = 0, where p, m and Q represent electric dipole moment, magnetic dipole moment and electric quadrupole moment, c is the light speed) in ref.[31], unlike the mechanism of the zero-backward scattering at k0R = 0.48π/3. Though the F/B ratio starts to drop again for k0R > 0.83π/3, this region is accompanied by a reduction of total scattering making it less attractive.
Figure 2

(a) Forward (blue curve) and the backward (red curve) scattering cross-sections, and the forward-to-backward ratio (black curve) of the spoof localized plasmonic structure. The inset in (a) indicates that a TM-polarized incident plane wave propagated from top to bottom along y direction. (b) Far-field scattering patterns in the five spectral points corresponding to those vertical dashed lines in (a) denoted by “1”, “2”, “3”, “4” and “5”.

(a) Forward (blue curve) and the backward (red curve) scattering cross-sections, and the forward-to-backward ratio (black curve) of the spoof localized plasmonic structure. The inset in (a) indicates that a TM-polarized incident plane wave propagated from top to bottom along y direction. (b) Far-field scattering patterns in the five spectral points corresponding to those vertical dashed lines in (a) denoted by “1”, “2”, “3”, “4” and “5”. Until now, we have demonstrated that the directional electromagnetic scattering can be induced due to the simultaneous excitation and mutual interference of electric dipole, magnetic dipole and electric quadrupole. Next, we discuss the influence of structure parameters of the spoof Mie resonant structure on the directional scattering. Figure 3(a) shows that forward and backward scattering cross section represented by blue and red solid line as the function of the dimensionless parameter k0R together with the F/B ratio curve for the structure with outside radius R. When decreasing the outside radius from R to 0.7 R and keeping other parameters unchanged, we can find that three curves coincidentally blue-shift due to the increase of resonant frequencies corresponding to magnetic dipole, electric dipole and electric quadrupole as can be seen from Fig. 3(a) to 3(d). However, the phenomena are completely different for increasing the inner radius as shown in Fig. 3(e–h), the first spectral range red-shifts and the third spectral range blue-shifts with the increase of the second spectral width. In fact, the spectral shift mainly depends on the shift of these resonant modes for changing the structure parameters. It is well known that the resonant frequencies of the electric dipole and quadrupole are increased with decreasing the depth of the metallic slits[29] or grooves[21] whether by decreasing the outside radius or increasing the inner radius of the hollow textured PEC cylinder. While the resonant frequency of magnetic dipolar mode mainly depends on the radius of displacement current circle excited by electric field. Thus, the resonant frequency of magnetic dipolar mode increases with the decrease of outside radius of the structure because the radius of the displacement current circle is inwards compressed. Inversely, the radius of the displacement current circle is pushed outward with increasing the inner radius of this structure and leading to the redshift of magnetic dipolar mode as shown in Fig. 3(e–h).
Figure 3

Forward (blue curve) and backward (red curve) scattering cross-sections as a function of dimensionless quantity k0R together with the forward-to-backward ratio for the designer structures with outside radius R, 0.9 R, 0.8 R and 0.7 R in (a–d), with different inner radius r, 2r, 3r and 4r in (e,f). While other parameters remain the same.

Forward (blue curve) and backward (red curve) scattering cross-sections as a function of dimensionless quantity k0R together with the forward-to-backward ratio for the designer structures with outside radius R, 0.9 R, 0.8 R and 0.7 R in (a–d), with different inner radius r, 2r, 3r and 4r in (e,f). While other parameters remain the same.

Directional scattering induced from quasiperiodic spoof Mie resonant structure

Furthermore, we also design the quasiperiodic spoof Mie resonant structure by alternately inserting dielectric materials A and B into the slits as in Fig. 4(a). The quasiperiodic structure unit is described in detail in Fig. 4(b), the green and yellow regions represent the dielectric materials A and B. Figure 4(c,d) correspond to the periodic substructures solely filled dielectric A and B in N/2 slits, respectively. With our intuitive understanding, the quasiperiodic structure should possess two sets of magnetic and electric dipolar resonant modes supported by slits A and B. In order to confirm this conjecture, we plot the SCSs of the quasiperiodic structure, periodic substructure A and B as black, red and blue solid line in Fig. 4(e) for setting dielectric materials nsA = 6 and nsB = 4, correspondingly. It is not difficult to find that the SCS of the quasiperiodic structure presents two magnetic dipolar modes and two electric dipolar modes with different frequencies. By comparing the three SCSs, we can also find that the electric dipolar modes of the quasiperiodic structure are consistent with those of the substructures, while all magnetic resonant modes are blue shifted. In fact, the shift of the magnetic resonant peaks of the quasiperiodic structure is the result of the contribution of additional displacement current induced by the other substructure filled with different material.
Figure 4

(a) Schematic diagram of quasiperiodic structure alternately filled with dielectric A and B in slits. The quasiperiodic structure unit is detailed described in (b), the green and yellow regions represent the dielectric materials A and B. (c) and (d) Two periodic substructures with one slit periodicity filled with dielectric A and B, correspondingly. The calculated SCS of the quasiperiodic structure, periodic substructure A and B as a function of dimensionless quantity k0R.

(a) Schematic diagram of quasiperiodic structure alternately filled with dielectric A and B in slits. The quasiperiodic structure unit is detailed described in (b), the green and yellow regions represent the dielectric materials A and B. (c) and (d) Two periodic substructures with one slit periodicity filled with dielectric A and B, correspondingly. The calculated SCS of the quasiperiodic structure, periodic substructure A and B as a function of dimensionless quantity k0R. It has been demonstrated that the quasiperiodic structure can supports two sets of magnetic and electric dipolar resonances as above discussion. Naturally, the multiband directional scattering from the quasiperiodic structure can be expected by the mutual interference between the electric and magnetic dipolar modes. Figure 5(a) shows the forward and backward scattering cross section as the function of the dimensionless parameter k0R together with the F/B ratio curve. As we desired, there are four peaks (vertical green dashed lines F1, F2, F3 and F4) and three valleys (vertical orange dashed lines B1, B2 and B3) in the F/B curve. This is easy to understand that the peaks F1, F2 and valley B1 of the F/B curve are the result of interference between the magnetic and electric dipolar modes excited in slits A. Similarly, the peaks F3, F4 and valley B3 come from the interference between magnetic and electric modes supported in slits B. However, the reason of forming valley B2 is the interference between the electric dipolar mode supported by slits A and the magnetic dipolar mode supported by slits B. In order to verify the performance of directional scattering, we plot the far field patterns corresponding to the valleys and peaks of the F/B curve in Fig. 5(b,c). The scattering diagrams at the locations B1, B2 and B3 demonstrate the scattering alignment into the backward direction with minor residual scattering in the forward direction. The calculated angular scattering diagrams at the locations F1, F2, F3 and F4 consistently demonstrate almost perfect alignment of the scattering into the forward direction. To further confirm the multiband directional scattering of the spoof Mie resonant structure, the scattering field distributions of directional backward scattering are presented in top row of Fig. 5(d) and directional forward scattering are showed in bottom row of Fig. 5(d). The pink arrows represent the incident direction of plane wave. From the scattering field distributions of directional backward scattering, we can find that the field strengths weaken in forward direction and enhance in backward direction for directional backward scattering in top row of Fig. 5(d) due to the interference of electric and magnetic dipolar modes. However, the asymmetries of field strengths in backward and forward direction are reversed for directional forward scattering as shown in bottom row of Fig. 5(d).
Figure 5

(a) Forward (blue curve) and the backward (red curve) scattering cross-sections, and the forward-to-backward ratio (black curve) of the quasiperiodic spoof localized plasmonic structure. Far-field scattering patterns in these spectral points corresponding to orange dashed lines in (a) denoted by “B1”, “B2”, “B3” (b) and green dashed lines in (a) denoted by “F1”, “F2”, “F3”, “F4” (c). (d) Scattering field distributions corresponding to directional backward scattering in the top row and directional forward scattering in the bottom row. The pink arrows in (d) and white circles represent the incident direction of plane wave and spoof Mie resonant structures, respectively.

(a) Forward (blue curve) and the backward (red curve) scattering cross-sections, and the forward-to-backward ratio (black curve) of the quasiperiodic spoof localized plasmonic structure. Far-field scattering patterns in these spectral points corresponding to orange dashed lines in (a) denoted by “B1”, “B2”, “B3” (b) and green dashed lines in (a) denoted by “F1”, “F2”, “F3”, “F4” (c). (d) Scattering field distributions corresponding to directional backward scattering in the top row and directional forward scattering in the bottom row. The pink arrows in (d) and white circles represent the incident direction of plane wave and spoof Mie resonant structures, respectively.

Discussion

Water is characterized by a refractive index at a temperature below 100 °C in microwave band[32,33], such as refractive index 7.07 at 90 °C and 8.9 at 20 °C in the frequency range from 1 GHz to 6 GHz. In order to active control the directional scattering by tuning water temperature, we design the outside radius R of the hollow textured structure as 5 mm, and fill the metallic slits with the water in the periodic structure as indicated in Fig. 1(a). We calculate the F/B curves as the function of frequency for different refractive indexes (ns = 7, 7.5, 8) of the water by controlling water temperatures from 90 °C to 25 °C. The result shows the whole F/B curve redshift due to the increase of refractive index of water as can be seen in Fig. 6(a). In the quasiperiodic structure, we choose silicon as the dielectric material A and water as the dielectric material B. By changing the temperature of the water, we can find that the peaks and valleys in the F/B curve are red shifted except the fourth peak for increasing the refractive index of water from nsB = 7 to nsB = 8 in Fig. 6(b). The redshift of the first two peaks is the result of the redshift of magnetic and electric resonant modes for increasing the refractive index of water, while the red-shift of the third peak comes from the influence of slits B on the magnetic dipolar resonance supported in slits A as shown in Fig. 4(e), even if the refractive index of silicon is not affected by temperature.
Figure 6

(a) F/B curves as the function of frequency for different refractive indexes (ns = 7, 7.5, 8) of the water filled in the slits of the periodic structure as shown in Fig. 1(a). (b) F/B curves as the function of frequency for different refractive indexes (nsB = 7, 7.5, 8) of the water as the dielectric material B and silicon as the dielectric material A in the quasiperiodic structure indicated in Fig. 4(a).

(a) F/B curves as the function of frequency for different refractive indexes (ns = 7, 7.5, 8) of the water filled in the slits of the periodic structure as shown in Fig. 1(a). (b) F/B curves as the function of frequency for different refractive indexes (nsB = 7, 7.5, 8) of the water as the dielectric material B and silicon as the dielectric material A in the quasiperiodic structure indicated in Fig. 4(a). In conclusion, we have demonstrated that the directional scattering can be induced by the spoof Mie resonant structure. The directional scattering behaviors results from interference of electric and magnetic dipoles supported by the designer structure. The simulation results confirm the theoretical predications, which states that the structure can scatter the most of light in the forward and backward direction at different frequencies. The directionality of the anisotropic scattering can be conveniently controlled by tailoring the geometric and material parameters. Furthermore, we also propose a quasiperiodic structure to present multiband directional scattering with the excitation of multiple electric and magnetic dipolar resonances. These results may open a novel route towards manipulation and control of electromagnetic scattering in microwave and terahertz region.

Methods

The numerical simulations are calculated by using commercial software COMSOL Multiphysics. The constituent material metal is highly conductive at the frequency of interest and can be treated as PEC. Here, the calculated region is surrounded by perfectly-matched layers to eliminate the undesired reflections. The total scattering cross sections of spoof Mie resonant structure are obtained by integrating the normal scattering Poynting vector on a closed curve that encloses the whole structure. Similarly, the forward and backward scattering cross sections are obtained by integrating the normal scattering Poynting vector on upper and lower semicircle for the incident wave radiates from top of structure in 2D scene, respectively.
  19 in total

1.  Realizing optical magnetism from dielectric metamaterials.

Authors:  James C Ginn; Igal Brener; David W Peters; Joel R Wendt; Jeffrey O Stevens; Paul F Hines; Lorena I Basilio; Larry K Warne; Jon F Ihlefeld; Paul G Clem; Michael B Sinclair
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-02-29       Impact factor: 9.161

2.  Cavity modes with optical orbital angular momentum in a metamaterial ring based on transformation optics.

Authors:  H W Wu; F Wang; Y Q Dong; F Z Shu; K Zhang; R W Peng; X Xiong; Mu Wang
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.894

3.  The quest for magnetic plasmons at optical frequencies.

Authors:  Andrea Alù; Nader Engheta
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  A generalized Kerker condition for highly directive nanoantennas.

Authors:  R Alaee; R Filter; D Lehr; F Lederer; C Rockstuhl
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.776

Review 5.  Optically resonant dielectric nanostructures.

Authors:  Arseniy I Kuznetsov; Andrey E Miroshnichenko; Mark L Brongersma; Yuri S Kivshar; Boris Luk'yanchuk
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Localized spoof plasmons arise while texturing closed surfaces.

Authors:  Anders Pors; Esteban Moreno; L Martin-Moreno; J B Pendry; F J Garcia-Vidal
Journal:  Phys Rev Lett       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 9.161

7.  Directional visible light scattering by silicon nanoparticles.

Authors:  Yuan Hsing Fu; Arseniy I Kuznetsov; Andrey E Miroshnichenko; Ye Feng Yu; Boris Luk'yanchuk
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Strong magnetic response of submicron silicon particles in the infrared.

Authors:  A García-Etxarri; R Gómez-Medina; L S Froufe-Pérez; C López; L Chantada; F Scheffold; J Aizpurua; M Nieto-Vesperinas; J J Sáenz
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 3.894

9.  Physical mechanism of order between electric and magnetic dipoles in spoof plasmonic structures.

Authors:  Hong-Wei Wu; Yi-Zeng Han; Hua-Jun Chen; Yu Zhou; Xue-Chao Li; Juan Gao; Zong-Qiang Sheng
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 3.776

10.  Localized Spoof Surface Plasmons based on Closed Subwavelength High Contrast Gratings: Concept and Microwave-Regime Realizations.

Authors:  Zhuo Li; Bingzheng Xu; Liangliang Liu; Jia Xu; Chen Chen; Changqing Gu; Yongjin Zhou
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.