| Literature DB >> 29891814 |
Yue Shi1,2, Wenjiang Huang3,4,5, Huichun Ye6,7, Chao Ruan8,9, Naichen Xing10,11, Yun Geng12,13, Yingying Dong14, Dailiang Peng15.
Abstract
In recent decades, rice disease co-epidemics have caused tremendous damage to crop production in both China and Southeast Asia. A variety of remote sensing based approaches have been developed and applied to map diseases distribution using coarse- to moderate-resolution imagery. However, the detection and discrimination of various disease species infecting rice were seldom assessed using high spatial resolution data. The aims of this study were (1) to develop a set of normalized two-stage vegetation indices (VIs) for characterizing the progressive development of different diseases with rice; (2) to explore the performance of combined normalized two-stage VIs in partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA); and (3) to map and evaluate the damage caused by rice diseases at fine spatial scales, for the first time using bi-temporal, high spatial resolution imagery from PlanetScope datasets at a 3 m spatial resolution. Our findings suggest that the primary biophysical parameters caused by different disease (e.g., changes in leaf area, pigment contents, or canopy morphology) can be captured using combined normalized two-stage VIs. PLS-DA was able to classify rice diseases at a sub-field scale, with an overall accuracy of 75.62% and a Kappa value of 0.47. The approach was successfully applied during a typical co-epidemic outbreak of rice dwarf (Rice dwarf virus, RDV), rice blast (Magnaporthe oryzae), and glume blight (Phyllosticta glumarum) in Guangxi Province, China. Furthermore, our approach highlighted the feasibility of the method in capturing heterogeneous disease patterns at fine spatial scales over the large spatial extents.Entities:
Keywords: PlanetScope; damage mapping; feature extraction; glume blight; high spatial resolution; rice blast; rice dwarf
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29891814 PMCID: PMC6021985 DOI: 10.3390/s18061901
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1A false-color map of study areas and survey plots in Guangxi Province, China. The rice planting areas are revealed as green polygons.
The parameters and information for the selected PlanetScope imagery.
| Parameters | Information |
|---|---|
| Sensor | PlanetScope |
| Acquisition date | 21 August 2017 and 30 October 2017 |
| Orbit altitude | 475 km |
| Spatial resolution (m) | 3 |
| Revisit time (days) | 1 |
| Wavelength range (nm) | |
| Band 1 | Blue: 455–515 |
| Band 2 | Green: 500–590 |
| Band 3 | Red: 590–670 |
| Band 4 | NIR: 780–860 |
| Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) | 68.8 |
Figure 2The representative samples for healthy rice and rice infested with dwarf, blast, and glume blight. Plots on the right show averaged spectral reflectance and deviation (the shadows) of each class collected on 21 August and 30 October.
The vegetation indices used for classifications in this study, with red band, NIR band, and green band denoted as RR, RNIR, and RG, respectively, for the Planet Satellites.
| Definition | Related Bands and Equations | Sensitive to | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normalized difference vegetation index, NDVI | (RNIR − RR)/(RNIR + RR) | Green biomass | [ |
| Soil-adjusted vegetation index, SAVI | (1 + | Canopy structure | [ |
| Triangular vegetation index, TVI | 0.5 × [120 × (RNIR − RG) − 200 × (RR − RG)] | Radiant absorption of chlorophyll | [ |
| Re-normalize difference vegetation index, RDVI | (RNIR − RR)/(RNIR + RR)0.5 | Vegetation coverage | [ |
| Modified Simple Ratio, MSR | (RNIR/RR)/(RNIR/RR)0.5 | Leaf area, Biomass | [ |
| Structural Independent Pigment Index, SIPI | (RNIR − RB)/(RNIR − RR) | Pigments content | [ |
Figure 3The mean and standard deviations of pixel-based single-date VIs shown on (left) and normalized two-stage VIs shown on (right).
A comparison of the independent classification abilities of selected spectral features.
| Means of Normalized Two-Stage VIs | Means on 30 October | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Rice | Rice Dwarf | Rice Blast | Glume Blight | Healthy Rice | Rice Dwarf | Rice Blast | Glume Blight | |
| NDVI | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | * |
| SAVI | *** | * | *** | * | * | ** | ** | * |
| TVI | ** | * | *** | ** | ** | * | ** | * |
| RDVI | ** | ** | *** | ** | * | * | ** | * |
| MSR | ** | ** | *** | ** | * | * | ** | * |
| SIPI | *** | *** | ** | *** | * | * | ** | ** |
Note: *** classification accuracy ≤ 60%, ** 30% ≤ classification accuracy < 60%, * classification accuracy < 30%.
The sensitivity of normalized two-stage and single date VIs based on ANOVA analysis.
| Means of Normalized Two-Stage VIs | Means on 30 October | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthy Rice | Rice Dwarf | Rice Blast | Glume Blight | Healthy Rice | Rice Dwarf | Rice Blast | Glume Blight | |
| NDVI | 0.032 ** | 0.014 ** | 0.058 | 0.065 | 0.078 * | 0.018 ** | 0.08 * | 0.102 |
| SAVI | 0.047 * | 0.046 * | 0.036 * | 0.079 | 0.032 * | 0.031 * | 0.166 | 0.052 * |
| TVI | 0.032 * | 0.02 ** | 0.04 * | 0.012 ** | 0.037 * | 0.104 | 0.142 | 0.051 * |
| RDVI | 0.01 * | 0.009 ** | 0.045 * | 0.066 | 0.048 * | 0.074 * | 0.125 | 0.091 |
| MSR | 0.057 | 0.095 | 0.027 ** | 0.091 | 0.073 | 0.125 | 0.077 | 0.054 * |
| SIPI | 0.039 * | 0.027 * | 0.087 | 0.036 * | 0.056 * | 0.124 | 0.145 | 0.09 |
Note: * indicates the different significance at 0.95 confidence level. ** indicates the different significance at 0.99 confidence level.
Figure 4A map of healthy and diseased rice based on the PLS-DA classifier from normalized two-stage and single-date VIs.
The confusion matrices and classification accuracies produced by normalized two-stage VIs and single-date VIs with the PLS-DA method.
| Predicted Class | Healthy Rice | Rice Dwarf | Rice Blast | Glume Blight | User’s Accuracy (%) | Overall Accuracy (%) | Kappa Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normalized two-stage VIs | |||||||
| Healthy rice | 54 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 87.1 | 75.62 | 0.47 |
| Rice dwarf | 4 | 60 | 5 | 9 | 76.92 | ||
| Rice blast | 11 | 4 | 48 | 5 | 70.59 | ||
| Glume blight | 5 | 8 | 2 | 27 | 64.29 | ||
| Producer’s accuracy (%) | 72.97 | 83.33 | 78.69 | 62.79 | |||
| single-date VIs | |||||||
| Healthy rice | 47 | 3 | 8 | 4 | 75.81 | 61.67 | 0.27 |
| Rice dwarf | 8 | 48 | 5 | 17 | 61.54 | ||
| Rice blast | 16 | 6 | 39 | 7 | 57.35 | ||
| Glume blight | 7 | 11 | 4 | 20 | 47.62 | ||
| Producer’s accuracy (%) | 60.26 | 70.59 | 69.64 | 41.67 |
Figure 5The importance of VIs for the detection of rice diseases as determined by the variable importance in the projection (VIP) method. Normalized two-stage and single-date VIs are projected as VIP scores.
Figure 6Mapping results of rice diseases in a sub-region based on the optimal normalized two-stage VIs based PLS-DA.