Julian C Hong1, Yunfeng Cui1, Bhavik N Patel2, Christel N Rushing3, Austin M Faught4, Jared S Eng1, Kyle Higgins5, Fang-Fang Yin1, Shiva Das6, Brian G Czito1, Christopher G Willett1, Manisha Palta7. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 2. Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California. 3. Duke Cancer Institute, Biostatistics Shared Resource, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee. 5. Levine Cancer Center, Charlotte, North Carolina. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: manisha.palta@duke.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Imaging parameters from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) before and after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for anal canal cancer correlate with clinical outcomes. This prospective, hypothesis-generating pilot study investigates the relationship between interim PET imaging during CRT for anal canal cancer and clinical outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From June 2012 to August 2015, 30 patients with anal canal cancer were enrolled in a prospective clinical study of PET prior to and during CRT after ∼30 Gy. PET parameters of the primary site included maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). MTV and TLG were calculated based on 40% SUVmax (MTV40, TLG40) or SUV 2.5 (MTV2.5, TLG2.5) thresholds for pretreatment and interim images. Absolute and change in PET parameters were assessed for association with freedom from local and regional recurrence (FFLR) using single-predictor Cox regression models. Local and regional recurrence were primary and nodal (in-field) recurrences, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were eligible for analysis. Patients were excluded with nonsquamous cell histology, recurrent anal cancer, and incomplete studies due to treatment toxicity or patient choice. Median follow-up was 2.5 years. Pretreatment MTV40 (HR 1.4 [95% CI 1.02-2.05]), interim MTV2.5 (1.4 [1.04-1.89]), and interim TLG2.5 (1.1 [1.01-1.21]) were associated with FFLR. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective pilot study, interim PET parameters were associated with FFLR. These results warrant further investigation assessing the value of interim PET as a biomarker of response in the treatment of patients with anal cancer.
PURPOSE: Imaging parameters from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) before and after chemoradiation therapy (CRT) for anal canal cancer correlate with clinical outcomes. This prospective, hypothesis-generating pilot study investigates the relationship between interim PET imaging during CRT for anal canal cancer and clinical outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From June 2012 to August 2015, 30 patients with anal canal cancer were enrolled in a prospective clinical study of PET prior to and during CRT after ∼30 Gy. PET parameters of the primary site included maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). MTV and TLG were calculated based on 40% SUVmax (MTV40, TLG40) or SUV 2.5 (MTV2.5, TLG2.5) thresholds for pretreatment and interim images. Absolute and change in PET parameters were assessed for association with freedom from local and regional recurrence (FFLR) using single-predictor Cox regression models. Local and regional recurrence were primary and nodal (in-field) recurrences, respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients were eligible for analysis. Patients were excluded with nonsquamous cell histology, recurrent anal cancer, and incomplete studies due to treatment toxicity or patient choice. Median follow-up was 2.5 years. Pretreatment MTV40 (HR 1.4 [95% CI 1.02-2.05]), interim MTV2.5 (1.4 [1.04-1.89]), and interim TLG2.5 (1.1 [1.01-1.21]) were associated with FFLR. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective pilot study, interim PET parameters were associated with FFLR. These results warrant further investigation assessing the value of interim PET as a biomarker of response in the treatment of patients with anal cancer.
Authors: Ramin Sadeghi; Sara Harsini; Mohammad Ali Qodsi Rad; Vahid Reza Dabbagh; Giorgio Treglia Journal: Contrast Media Mol Imaging Date: 2018-12-04 Impact factor: 3.161
Authors: Matthew S Susko; Ann A Lazar; Chia-Ching Jackie Wang; Katherine Van Loon; Mary Feng; Tom A Hope; Spencer Behr; Mekhail Anwar Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 3.240