Literature DB >> 29890581

Life cycle assessment of high rate algal ponds for wastewater treatment and resource recovery.

Larissa Terumi Arashiro1, Neus Montero2, Ivet Ferrer2, Francisco Gabriel Acién3, Cintia Gómez3, Marianna Garfí4.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the potential environmental impacts associated with high rate algal ponds (HRAP) systems for wastewater treatment and resource recovery in small communities. To this aim, a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was carried out evaluating two alternatives: i) a HRAP system for wastewater treatment where microalgal biomass is valorized for energy recovery (biogas production); ii) a HRAP system for wastewater treatment where microalgal biomass is reused for nutrients recovery (biofertilizer production). Additionally, both alternatives were compared to a typical small-sized activated sludge system. An economic assessment was also performed. The results showed that HRAP system coupled with biogas production appeared to be more environmentally friendly than HRAP system coupled with biofertilizer production in the climate change, ozone layer depletion, photochemical oxidant formation, and fossil depletion impact categories. Different climatic conditions have strongly influenced the results obtained in the eutrophication and metal depletion impact categories. In fact, the HRAP system located where warm temperatures and high solar radiation are predominant (HRAP system coupled with biofertilizer production) showed lower impact in those categories. Additionally, the characteristics (e.g. nutrients and heavy metals concentration) of microalgal biomass recovered from wastewater appeared to be crucial when assessing the potential environmental impacts in the terrestrial acidification, particulate matter formation and toxicity impact categories. In terms of costs, HRAP systems seemed to be more economically feasible when combined with biofertilizer production instead of biogas. On the whole, implementing HRAPs instead of activated sludge systems might increase sustainability and cost-effectiveness of wastewater treatment in small communities, especially if implemented in warm climate regions and coupled with biofertilizer production.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biogas; Environmental impact assessment; Fertilizer; Life cycle assessment; Microalgae; Resource recovery

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29890581     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  8 in total

1.  Strategies to Optimize Microalgae Conversion to Biogas: Co-Digestion, Pretreatment and Hydraulic Retention Time.

Authors:  Maria Solé-Bundó; Humbert Salvadó; Fabiana Passos; Marianna Garfí; Ivet Ferrer
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 2.  Efficient Anaerobic Digestion of Microalgae Biomass: Proteins as a Key Macromolecule.

Authors:  Jose Antonio Magdalena; Mercedes Ballesteros; Cristina González-Fernandez
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2018-05-06       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 3.  Integration of Green Energy and Advanced Energy-Efficient Technologies for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plants.

Authors:  Ziyang Guo; Yongjun Sun; Shu-Yuan Pan; Pen-Chi Chiang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Impact of Organic Loading Rate in Volatile Fatty Acids Production and Population Dynamics Using Microalgae Biomass as Substrate.

Authors:  Jose Antonio Magdalena; Silvia Greses; Cristina González-Fernández
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  A comprehensive review on the use of algal-bacterial systems for wastewater treatment with emphasis on nutrient and micropollutant removal.

Authors:  Raj Kumar Oruganti; Keerthi Katam; Pau Loke Show; Venkataramana Gadhamshetty; Venkata Krishna Kumar Upadhyayula; Debraj Bhattacharyya
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 6.832

6.  Life cycle impact assessment and life cycle cost assessment for centralized and decentralized wastewater treatment plants in Thailand.

Authors:  Rutjaya Prateep Na Talang; Sanya Sirivithayapakorn; Sucheela Polruang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Assessing METland® Design and Performance Through LCA: Techno-Environmental Study With Multifunctional Unit Perspective.

Authors:  Lorena Peñacoba-Antona; Jorge Senán-Salinas; Arantxa Aguirre-Sierra; Pedro Letón; Juan José Salas; Eloy García-Calvo; Abraham Esteve-Núñez
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Natural Pigments and Biogas Recovery from Microalgae Grown in Wastewater.

Authors:  Larissa T Arashiro; Ivet Ferrer; Catalina C Pániker; Juan Luis Gómez-Pinchetti; Diederik P L Rousseau; Stijn W H Van Hulle; Marianna Garfí
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 8.198

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.