Literature DB >> 29890378

Impaired planning in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder and unaffected first-degree relatives: Evidence for a cognitive endophenotype.

Katharina Bey1, Christian Kaufmann2, Leonhard Lennertz3, Anja Riesel2, Julia Klawohn4, Stephan Heinzel5, Rosa Grützmann2, Norbert Kathmann2, Michael Wagner6.   

Abstract

Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) show deficient planning capacity in the Tower of London (TOL) problem solving task. Preliminary evidence for similar deficits in unaffected first-degree relatives suggests that impaired planning may constitute an endophenotype of OCD. However, results on this issue are inconsistent, possibly owing to small sample sizes and variability in problem structure across TOL tasks. Here, we adopted a computerized version of the TOL task featuring a 2 × 2 factorial design (high/low search depth × full/partial tower goal state) and examined a well-characterized sample of n = 72 OCD patients, n = 76 unaffected first-degree relatives and n = 102 healthy comparison subjects. Both OCD patients and relatives exhibited significantly less accurate problem solving than controls. Search depth, goal hierarchy, or the number of minimum moves did not moderate these group differences. Medication, OCD symptoms, and depressive comorbidity did not affect TOL performance in patients, suggesting a state-independent effect. In conclusion, we found that OCD patients as well as unaffected first-degree relatives show deficient TOL performance across a range of task conditions, strongly supporting the role of impaired planning as an endophenotype of OCD, and contributing to the growing evidence for fronto-striatal dysfunctions in OCD.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endophenotype; OCD; Obsessive-compulsive disorder; Planning; Tower of London

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29890378     DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anxiety Disord        ISSN: 0887-6185


  7 in total

1.  Neurocognitive Endophenotypes of OCD.

Authors:  Matilde M Vaghi
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021

2.  Neurocognitive endophenotypes in pediatric OCD probands, their unaffected parents and siblings.

Authors:  Amitai Abramovitch; Alessandro S De Nadai; Daniel A Geller
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 5.201

3.  Evidence towards a continuum of impairment across neurodevelopmental disorders from basic ocular-motor tasks.

Authors:  Daniela Canu; Chara Ioannou; Katarina Müller; Berthold Martin; Christian Fleischhaker; Monica Biscaldi; André Beauducel; Nikolaos Smyrnis; Ludger Tebartz van Elst; Christoph Klein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Developmental Considerations in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder: Comparing Pediatric and Adult-Onset Cases.

Authors:  Daniel A Geller; Saffron Homayoun; Gabrielle Johnson
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 5.  Imaging the socially-anxious brain: recent advances and future prospects.

Authors:  Janna Marie Bas-Hoogendam; P Michiel Westenberg
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-04-02

6.  Dysfunction between dorsal caudate and salience network associated with impaired cognitive flexibility in obsessive-compulsive disorder: A resting-state fMRI study.

Authors:  Hirofumi Tomiyama; Tomohiro Nakao; Keitaro Murayama; Kiyotaka Nemoto; Keisuke Ikari; Satoshi Yamada; Masumi Kuwano; Suguru Hasuzawa; Osamu Togao; Akio Hiwatashi; Shigenobu Kanba
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  The effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on brain functional networks during goal-directed planning in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Authors:  Minah Kim; Wi Hoon Jung; Geumsook Shim; Jun Soo Kwon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.