| Literature DB >> 29890043 |
Ramesh Chennupati1,2,3,4, Merlijn J Meens2,5, Ben J Janssen2,3, Paul van Dijk1, Theodorus B M Hakvoort6, Wouter H Lamers1,4, Jo G R De Mey2,3,7,8, S Eleonore Koehler1,4.
Abstract
Endothelial arginase 1 was ablated to assess whether this prevents hyperglycemia-induced endothelial dysfunction by improving arginine availability for nitric oxide production. Endothelial Arg1-deficient mice (Arg1-KOTie2 ) were generated by crossing Arg1fl/fl (controls) with Tie2Cretg/- mice and analyzed by immunohistochemistry, measurements of hemodynamics, and wire myography. Ablation was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. Mean arterial blood pressure was similar in conscious male control and Arg1-KOTie2 mice. Depletion of circulating arginine by intravenous infusion of arginase 1 or inhibition of nitric oxide synthase activity with L-NG -nitro-arginine methyl ester increased mean arterial pressure similarly in control (9 ± 2 and 34 ± 2 mmHg, respectively) and Arg1-KOTie2 mice (11 ± 3 and 38 ± 4 mmHg, respectively). Vasomotor responses were studied in isolated saphenous arteries of 12- and 34-week-old Arg1-KOTie2 and control animals by wire myography. Diabetes was induced in 10-week-old control and Arg1-KOTie2 mice with streptozotocin, and vasomotor responses were studied 10 weeks later. Optimal arterial diameter, contractile responses to phenylephrine, and relaxing responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside were similar in normoglycemic control and Arg1-KOTie2 mice. The relaxing response to acetylcholine was dependent on the availability of extracellular l-arginine. In the diabetic mice, arterial relaxation responses to endothelium-dependent hyperpolarization and to exogenous nitric oxide were impaired. The data show that endothelial ablation of arginase 1 in mice does not markedly modify smooth muscle and endothelial functions of a resistance artery under normo- and hyperglycemic conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Arginase 1 deficiency; endothelial dysfunction; nitric oxide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29890043 PMCID: PMC5995309 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.13717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Figure 4The effect of 14 consecutive contraction‐relaxation cycles (CRC) on ACh‐induced relaxation during contractions induced by PHE (10 μmol·L−1). Two‐mm arterial segments were kept in L‐Arg‐free culture medium during the experiment. The EC 50 increased, whereas the Maximal response decreased with increasing number of CRCs (panel A). In a separate experiment (panel B), the arterial segments were subjected to repeated CRCs in L‐Arg‐free culture medium until relaxation had decreased to ~25%. L‐Arg (1 mmol·L−1) was then added. ACh‐induced relaxations were tested after 60 min. CRC: contraction‐relaxation cycle.
Figure 1Expression of ARG1 protein in saphenous arteries of male mice. Panel (A): control, panel (B): 8‐month‐old normoglycemic control, panel (C): diabetic control (DM), panel (D): diabetic Arg1‐KO ie2 mice. Panels (E, F, G) and (H) show the complementary H&E staining of a serial section of the respective arteries. Arrows indicate endothelial cells. All tissues were fixed with acetone/methanol/water (see Materials and Methods).
Effect of Arg1 ablation on plasma amino acid concentrations in 12‐week‐old healthy male and 22‐week‐old male diabetic mice
| Plasma amino acids [ | Control | Arg1‐KOTie2 | Control STZ‐treated | Arg1‐KOTie2 STZ‐treated |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alanine | 484 ± 25 | 390 ± 72 | 500 ± 51 | 575 ± 67 |
| Arginine | 103 ± 13 | 126 ± 26 | 121 ± 9 | 156 ± 8 |
| Asparagine | 46 ± 15 | 33 ± 11 | 39 ± 5 | 61 ± 13 |
| Ornithine | 91 ± 4 | 79 ± 8 | 100 ± 9 | 116 ± 15 |
| Citrulline | 52 ± 5 | 46 ± 4 | 78 ± 5 | 85 ± 7 |
| Glutamic acid | 88 ± 9 | 80 ± 15 | 97 ± 10 | 110 ± 14 |
| Glutamine | 518 ± 80 | 518 ± 102 | 537 ± 29 | 577 ± 55 |
| Glycine | 276 ± 16 | 260 ± 35 | 236 ± 13 | 275 ± 26 |
| Histidine | 71 ± 5 | 61 ± 5 | 56 ± 5 | 59 ± 4 |
| Isoleucine | 97 ± 10 | 87 ± 8 | 170 ± 21 | 192 ± 42 |
| Leucine | 159 ± 11 | 154 ± 14 | 279 ± 36 | 313 ± 68 |
| Lysine | 256 ± 20 | 256 ± 32 | 336 ± 67 | 485 ± 78 |
| Methionine | 43 ± 1 | 40 ± 4 | 37 ± 4 | 48 ± 5 |
| Phenylalanine | 43 ± 10 | 59 ± 5 | 59 ± 3 | 72 ± 7 |
| Taurine | 72 ± 11 | 73 ± 12 | 80 ± 6 | 131 ± 15 |
| Serine | 132 ± 16 | 115 ± 17 | 129 ± 11 | 149 ± 21 |
| Threonine | 132 ± 17 | 116 ± 15 | 140 ± 13 | 169 ± 21 |
| Tryptophan | 259 ± 21 | 255 ± 33 | 169 ± 19 | 159 ± 16 |
| Tyrosine | 332 ± 31 | 404 ± 43 | 312 ± 38 | 306 ± 27 |
| Valine | 259 ± 15 | 220 ± 13 | 387 ± 49 | 432 ± 90 |
| ΣAA | 3578 ± 256 | 3449 ± 407 | 3863 ± 215 | 4851 ± 554 |
| Arginine‐availability index | 0.33 ± 0.03 | 0.32 ± 0.02 | 0.36 ± 0.05 | 0.26 ± 0.03 |
All values are shown as means ± SEM.
1 P < 0.05 compared with the corresponding control group (knockout vs. wild type).
2 P < 0.05 compared with the corresponding healthy group (diabetes vs. healthy). Control: n = 3; Arg1‐KOTie2: n = 4; STZ‐control: n = 14; STZ‐Arg1‐KOTie2: n = 6. Arginine‐availability index: [Arg]/([Orn] + [Lys]). For P‐values of the comparisons, see Table S1.
Figure 2Effects of endothelial Arg1 ablation on mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) in 34‐week‐old conscious male mice. Blood pressure was measured in the same mice 2 (Basal, +Arginase) and 3 days (Basal 2, +L‐NAME) after implantation of a femoral artery catheter connected to a pressure transducer. Since MAP in control and Arg1‐KO ie2 mice did not differ either under basal or treatment conditions, data from both groups were pooled. Left side: MAP under basal conditions and after a bolus injection of 200U bovine ARG1 via a jugular vein catheter. Right side: MAP under basal conditions one day later (Basal 2) and after intravenous L‐NAME (10 mg·kg−1) injection (right). Values are means ± SEM. Nine mice (five control + four Arg1‐KO ie2) received the arginase infusion; due to loss of catheter patency in one control mouse, eight mice received the L‐NAME infusion. Differences between treatments were analyzed with a paired t‐test.
Effects of genotype, arginase 1, and L‐NAME treatment on heart rate in conscious male mice
| Comparison of genotypes | Effect of treatment | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control [beats. min−1] | ARG1‐KOTie2 [beats. min−1] |
| ΔHR [bp. min−1] |
| ||
| Basal HR | 651 ± 21 | 713 ± 42 | 0.184 | |||
| Before ARG1 | 657 ± 37 | 733 ± 45 | 0.230 | ARG1 | 39 ± 33 | 0.276 |
| After ARG1 | 627 ± 35 | 693 ± 49 | 0.326 | |||
| Before L‐Name | 661 ± 30 | 768 ± 48 | 0.109 | L‐NAME | 189 ± 46 | 0.006 |
| After L‐NAME | 525 ± 15 | 531 ± 66 | 0.914 | |||
Heart rate was determined as described in Materials and Methods. Values are given as means ± SEM. Differences between genotypes were assessed with an independent t‐test (n per group 3–5 animals). Since control and Arg1‐KOTie2 mice did not differ significantly under any of the conditions tested, all animals were pooled to assess the effect of the treatments with a paired t‐test (n for ARG1 = 9, L‐NAME = 7).
Figure 3Effects of endothelial Arg1 ablation on relaxation responses to ACh (0.01–10 μmol·L−1) during PHE‐ (10 μmol·L−1) induced contractions in saphenous arteries isolated from 12‐ (panels A–C) or 34‐ (panels D–F) week‐old normoglycemic and 22‐week‐old hyperglycemic (panels G–I) male mice. Black squares: control mice; white circles: Arg1‐KO ie2 mice. Panels (A, D, G) in the absence of pharmacological inhibitors. Panels (B, E, H) in the presence of indomethacin (INDO, 10 μmol.L−1). Panels (C, F, I) in the presence of INDO (10 μmol·L−1) and L‐NAME (100 μmol·L−1). Values are shown as means ± SEM (n = 5–7; for the number of animals per individual experiment, see Table S2).
Effect of endothelial ablation of Arg1 on relaxation responses
| Control | Arg1‐KOTie2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sensitivity | Maximal response% |
| Sensitivity | Maximal response% |
| |
| 12‐week‐old mice | ||||||
| Without inhibitors | 6.7 ± 0.1 | 94 ± 2 | 7 | 6.7 ± 0.1 | 97 ± 3 | 4 |
| INDO | 6.5 ± 0.2 | 94 ± 1 | 6 | 6.6 ± 0.1 | 88 ± 4 | 5 |
| INDO + L‐NAME | 6.0 ± 0.1 | 56 ± 7 | 7 | 6.2 ± 0.2 | 57 ± 12 | 5 |
| Relaxation to EDNO | 6.1 ± 0.1 | 60 ± 4 | 6 | 5.9 ± 0.1 | 56 ± 6 | 4 |
| Relaxation to SNP | 7.6 ± 0.1 | 97 ± 1 | 5 | 7.7 ± 0.1 | 97 ± 1 | 5 |
| 34‐week‐old mice | ||||||
| Without inhibitors | 6.7 ± 0.1 | 90 ± 3 | 7 | 6.6 ± 0.1 | 88 ± 6 | 4 |
| INDO | 6.6 ± 0.1 | 88 ± 3 | 8 | 6.7 ± 0.3 | 89 ± 6 | 4 |
| INDO + L‐NAME | NA | 39 ± 6 | 7 | NA | 29 ± 8 | 4 |
| Relaxation to EDNO | 6.1 ± 0.2 | 54 ± 7 | 6 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 53 ± 6 | 4 |
| Relaxation to SNP | 7.5 ± 0.1 | 97 ± 1 | 7 | 7.6 ± 0.3 | 98 ± 1 | 5 |
| 22‐week‐old diabetic mice | ||||||
| Without inhibitors | 6.5 ± 0.1 | 86 ± 6 | 7 | 6.4 ± 0.2 | 82 ± 8 | 5 |
| INDO | 6.5 ± 0.1 | 81 ± 4 | 8 | 6.5 ± 0.2 | 76 ± 7 | 5 |
| INDO + L‐NAME | NA | 18 ± 5 | 7 | NA | 19 ± 6 | 5 |
| Relaxation to EDNO | 6.2 ± 0.1 | 47 ± 3 | 6 | 6.0 ± 0.2 | 41 ± 6 | 5 |
| Relaxation to SNP | 7.0 ± 0.1 | 98 ± 1 | 7 | 6.8 ± 0.1 | 96 ± 1 | 5 |
Relaxation responses to acetylcholine (ACh; 0.01–10 μmol·L−1) in PHE‐ (10 μmol·L−1) or K+ (40 mmol·L−1) contracted vessels were determined in the presence or absence of indomethacin (INDO, 10 μmol·L−1) and L‐NAME (100 μmol·L−1). Maximal relaxation (Maximal response) is expressed as % reduction of the maximal contractile response to PHE (10 μmol·L−1), except for endothelium‐derived nitric oxide (EDNO) responses (% reduction of maximal contractile response to 40 mmol·L−1 K+). In the presence of NOS inhibitor L‐NAME (100 μmol·L−1) and INDO (10 μmol·L−1), the maximal relaxation to an NO‐donor is determined by exposing the vessels to SNP (0.01–10 μmol·L−1).
1 P < 0.05 compared with the corresponding control group (knockout vs. wild type).
2 P < 0.05 compared with the corresponding control group (diabetes vs. control). All values are shown as mean ± SEM.
Figure 5The effect of endothelial Arg1 ablation on relaxation responses to sodium nitroprusside (SNP, 0.01–10 μmol·L−1) during PHE‐ (10 μmol·L−1) induced contraction in saphenous arteries of 12‐ (panel A), 34‐ (panel B) week‐old normoglycemic and 22‐week‐old diabetic (panel C) male mice. Black squares: control mice; white circles: Arg1‐KO ie2. All experiments were performed in the presence of INDO (10 μmol·L−1) and L‐NAME (100 μmol·L−1). Values are shown as means ± SEM (n = 5–7; for the number of animals per individual experiment, see Table S2).