Saba Pasha1,2, Brice Ilharreborde3, Keith Baldwin1. 1. Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA. 2. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics, Robert Debré Hospital, Paris 7 University, Paris, France.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the differences in the sagittal spinopelvic parameters between the nonscoliotic controls, preoperative, and different time points postoperative in Lenke 1 and 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The postoperative changes in the sagittal profile of Lenke 1 and 5 AIS at varying time points after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) has not been rigorously demonstrated; studies performed have had conflicting results. METHODS: Sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters, T5-T12 thoracic kyphosis (TK), L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA), for Lenke 1 and 5 preoperatively, at immediate, less than 2-year, and more than 2-year postoperatively, and for nonscoliotic adolescents were searched. Differences in the sagittal spinopelvic parameters between preoperative and the follow-ups and between the nonscoliotic and pre- and postoperative AIS subtypes were calculated through meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies on Lenke1 (1229 patients), 13 studies on Lenke5 (437 patients), and 18 studies on controls (1636 patients) were reviewed. Among all the measured variables, only PI in Lenke1 was significantly different between the final follow-up and controls, P < 0.05. In Lenke 1, SVA was significantly more anterior at the immediate postoperative than preoperative, but continued moving posteriorly up to 2-year postoperative resulting in no significant difference in the SVA position between the final follow-up and preoperative, P > 0.05. In Lenke 5, SVA was significantly more posterior at the immediate postoperative and more anterior at the final follow-up than the preoperative measurements, p < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous changes in the sagittal spinal parameters should be expected after PSF. Normalization of the sagittal spinal parameters appears to be the rule after PSF, and watchful waiting appears to be appropriate in this population when viewing the lateral X-ray postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the differences in the sagittal spinopelvic parameters between the nonscoliotic controls, preoperative, and different time points postoperative in Lenke 1 and 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The postoperative changes in the sagittal profile of Lenke 1 and 5 AIS at varying time points after posterior spinal fusion (PSF) has not been rigorously demonstrated; studies performed have had conflicting results. METHODS: Sagittal spinal and pelvic parameters, T5-T12 thoracic kyphosis (TK), L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA), for Lenke 1 and 5 preoperatively, at immediate, less than 2-year, and more than 2-year postoperatively, and for nonscoliotic adolescents were searched. Differences in the sagittal spinopelvic parameters between preoperative and the follow-ups and between the nonscoliotic and pre- and postoperative AIS subtypes were calculated through meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies on Lenke1 (1229 patients), 13 studies on Lenke5 (437 patients), and 18 studies on controls (1636 patients) were reviewed. Among all the measured variables, only PI in Lenke1 was significantly different between the final follow-up and controls, P < 0.05. In Lenke 1, SVA was significantly more anterior at the immediate postoperative than preoperative, but continued moving posteriorly up to 2-year postoperative resulting in no significant difference in the SVA position between the final follow-up and preoperative, P > 0.05. In Lenke 5, SVA was significantly more posterior at the immediate postoperative and more anterior at the final follow-up than the preoperative measurements, p < 0.05. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous changes in the sagittal spinal parameters should be expected after PSF. Normalization of the sagittal spinal parameters appears to be the rule after PSF, and watchful waiting appears to be appropriate in this population when viewing the lateral X-ray postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.
Authors: Colleen Rentenberger; Ichiro Okano; Stephan N Salzmann; Toshiyuki Shirahata; Marie-Jacqueline Reisener; Jennifer Shue; Andrew A Sama; Frank P Cammisa; Federico P Girardi; Alexander P Hughes Journal: Asian Spine J Date: 2020-09-03