Literature DB >> 29889785

First Results With a New, Pressure-free, Adhesive Bone Conduction Hearing Aid.

Valerie Dahm1, Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner, Rudolfs Liepins, Christoph Arnoldner, Dominik Riss.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the hearing benefit, advantages, and disadvantages in a series of patients using a new, nonimplantable, pressure-free, adhesive bone conduction hearing aid.
METHODS: Twelve patients were included in the study at the ear, nose, and throat department of the Medical University of Vienna. All patients suffered from conductive hearing loss for at least 3 months. A sound field audiometry, Freiburg monosyllables word test and Oldenburg sentence test were carried out. Additionally, sound quality (SSQ12) and quality of life (AQoL-8D) were assessed using questionnaires.
RESULTS: Analysis revealed an average aided threshold of 30.8 dB HL (±7.1 SD) and an unaided threshold of 45.1 dB HL (±7.0 SD), resulting in a statistically significant (p < 0.001) average functional gain. Additionally, participants experienced about 30% gain in word recognition scores at 65 dB sound pressure level, speech reception threshold in quiet was 56.8 dB (±6.1) and improved to 44.5 dB (±6.4) in the aided condition. Both, the SSQ12 and the AQoL-8D showed a statistically significant improvement when comparing the scores at the beginning of the study to the answers after 2 weeks of device usage (SSQ12 (p < 0.002) and AQoL-8D (p = 0.002)). Neither skin irritations nor pain were reported during the study period.
CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this new, adhesive bone conduction hearing aid has a high patient satisfaction rate while causing no skin irritation or pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29889785     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001829

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  3 in total

1.  Audiological and subjective benefit with a new adhesive bone conduction hearing aid in children with congenital unilateral microtia and atresia.

Authors:  Yujie Liu; Chunli Zhao; Jinsong Yang; Peiwei Chen; Mengdie Gao; Danni Wang; Shouqin Zhao
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-24       Impact factor: 3.236

2.  A Comparative Study of a Novel Adhesive Bone Conduction Device and Conventional Treatment Options for Conductive Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Piotr H Skarzynski; Anna Ratuszniak; Kamila Osinska; Magdalena Koziel; Bartlomiej Krol; Katarzyna B Cywka; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Health-related quality of life in adults with profound postlingual hearing loss before and after cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Joanna Rostkowska; Piotr Henryk Skarzynski; Joanna Kobosko; Elzbieta Gos; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.503

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.