Literature DB >> 29889756

Hospital Readmission as a Poor Measure of Quality in Ovarian Cancer Surgery.

Shitanshu Uppal1, Ryan J Spencer, Laurel W Rice, Marcela G Del Carmen, R Kevin Reynolds, Jennifer J Griggs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of 30-day readmission rate as a quality of care metric in patients undergoing ovarian cancer surgery.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of women diagnosed between 2004 and 2013 with advanced-stage, high-grade, serous carcinoma who underwent primary treatment. Using the National Cancer Database, we compared the performance of hospital risk-adjusted 30-day readmission rate to other quality of care metrics (risk-adjusted 30- and 90-day mortality, rates of adherence to guideline-based care, and overall survival) within hospitals categorized by yearly case volume (10 or less, 11-20, 21-30, and 31 cases per year or more).
RESULTS: A total of 42,931 patients met the inclusion criteria. The overall unplanned 30-day readmission rate was 6.36% (95% CI 6.13-6.59). After adjusting for comorbidity, stage, histology, and sociodemographic and treatment factors, hospitals performing 31 cases per year or more had a 24% higher likelihood of readmission (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.25, 95% CI 1.06-1.46) when compared with those performing 10 cases per year or less. However, hospitals performing 31 cases per year or more had a significantly lower risk-adjusted 90-day mortality (adjusted OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.60-0.91) despite higher rates of complex surgical procedures and higher rates of guideline-concordant care delivery (86% vs 77%, P<.001). In the Cox proportional hazards regression model, care at a high-volume hospital was independently predictive of lower hazard of death (adjusted hazard ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.82-0.90).
CONCLUSION: Hospitals with 31 cases per year or more have a lower 30- and 90-day mortality despite performing more complex surgeries, are more likely to be adherent to guideline-based care, and achieved higher overall survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29889756     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002693

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  3 in total

1.  Potential Consequences of Minimum-Volume Standards for Hospitals Treating Women With Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Yongmei Huang; Alexander Melamed; Ana I Tergas; Caryn M St Clair; June Y Hou; Fady Khoury-Collado; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Association between hospital surgical volume and perioperative outcomes of fertility-sparing trachelectomy for cervical cancer: A national study in the United States.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Shinya Matsuzaki; Rachel S Mandelbaum; Kazuhide Matsushima; Maximilian Klar; Brendan H Grubbs; Lynda D Roman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Enhancing ovarian cancer care: a systematic review of guideline adherence and clinical variation.

Authors:  Kahren M White; Holly Seale; Reema Harrison
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.295

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.