Literature DB >> 29889227

Establishing gold standards for System-Level Measures: a modified Delphi consensus process.

Fiona Doolan-Noble1, Stuart Barson2, M Lyndon3, F Cullinane4, J Gray3, T Stokes1, R Gauld2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish aspirational 'gold standards' for a suite of System-Level Measures (SLMs) being used by Counties Manukau Health (CM Health), a New Zealand (NZ) District Health Board.
DESIGN: This study employed a multi-stage, multi-method modified Delphi consensus process.
SETTING: The Delphi consensus process involved virtual (email) communication between participants (Round 1) and a structured face-to-face meeting (Round 2) held in Auckland, NZ. PARTICIPANTS: Participants comprised of health professionals, managers, academics and quality improvement experts with an interest in the use of SLMs.
INTERVENTIONS: Participants in the first round received a letter requesting their participation in an anonymous Delphi. The second round involved national and international health system experts taking part in a structured, facilitated face-to-face meeting. Participants reviewed 15 SLMs in total. The SLMs all related to the three domains of the Triple Aim: Population Health, e.g. life expectancy at birth; Patient Experience of Care, e.g. rate of adverse events; and Cost and Productivity, e.g. healthcare expenditure per capita. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For a proposed gold standard to be agreed and established for each SLM.
RESULTS: Twelve participants took part in Round 1, with 19 participating in Round 2. The process established agreement on a gold standard for each of the 15 reviewed SLMs.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the Delphi consensus process can be used to establish gold standards for a suite of SLMs used by a NZ Health Board (CM Health).
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benchmarking; health policy; healthcare system; measurement of quality; quality indicators

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 29889227     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  1 in total

1.  New Zealand's Integration-Based Policy for Driving Local Health System Improvement - Which Conditions Underpin More Successful Implementation?

Authors:  Tim Tenbensel; Pushkar Raj Silwal; Lisa Walton; Reuben Olugbenga Ayeleke
Journal:  Int J Integr Care       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 5.120

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.