Mohammad Y Salmasi1, Amer Harky2, Mohammed F Chowdhury1, Ali Abdelnour3, Anastasia Benjafield4, Farah Suker5, Stephanie Hubbard6, Hunaid A Vohra7. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK. 2. Department of Cardiac Surgery, St Bartholemew's Hospital, London, UK. 3. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Royal Hospitals, Belfast, UK. 4. Department of Cardiac Surgery, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK. 5. Department of Medical Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK. 6. Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK. 7. Bristol Heart Institute, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is associated with increased mortality and recurrent congestive heart failure following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. While mitral surgery should be undertaken for severe MR during CABG, the treatment of moderate IMR remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the outcomes of CABG alone and combine with mitral valve repair (MVr) in moderate IMR. METHODS: A literature search was conducted by Pubmed, Ovid, and Embase, which included 643 articles. Eleven studies (seven observational studies and four randomized controlled trials) with a total of 1406 patients were included (CABG alone = 864 and CABG plus MVr = 542). RESULTS: There was no difference in operative mortality (odds ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-2.71) or long-term survival at 1 or 5 years (hazard ratio 0.98, 95%CI 0.71-1.35, P = 0.49) between the two groups, and little evidence of heterogeneity was found in the studies (I2 = 0.0, P = 0.562). There was significantly greater improvement in MR grade (weighted mean difference [WMD] -1.15, 95%CI -1.67 to -0.064, P = < 0.001) and left ventricular systolic diameter (WMD -3.02, 95%CI -4.85 to -1.18, P = 0.001) following CABG and MVr compared to CABG alone. No difference in postoperative functional class or ejection fraction was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in the presence of moderate IMR, adding MVr to revascularization reduces MR grade on follow-up echocardiography and promotes ventricular remodeling, with no improvement in long-term survival or functional class.
BACKGROUND:Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is associated with increased mortality and recurrent congestive heart failure following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. While mitral surgery should be undertaken for severe MR during CABG, the treatment of moderate IMR remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to determine the outcomes of CABG alone and combine with mitral valve repair (MVr) in moderate IMR. METHODS: A literature search was conducted by Pubmed, Ovid, and Embase, which included 643 articles. Eleven studies (seven observational studies and four randomized controlled trials) with a total of 1406 patients were included (CABG alone = 864 and CABG plus MVr = 542). RESULTS: There was no difference in operative mortality (odds ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92-2.71) or long-term survival at 1 or 5 years (hazard ratio 0.98, 95%CI 0.71-1.35, P = 0.49) between the two groups, and little evidence of heterogeneity was found in the studies (I2 = 0.0, P = 0.562). There was significantly greater improvement in MR grade (weighted mean difference [WMD] -1.15, 95%CI -1.67 to -0.064, P = < 0.001) and left ventricular systolic diameter (WMD -3.02, 95%CI -4.85 to -1.18, P = 0.001) following CABG and MVr compared to CABG alone. No difference in postoperative functional class or ejection fraction was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that in the presence of moderate IMR, adding MVr to revascularization reduces MR grade on follow-up echocardiography and promotes ventricular remodeling, with no improvement in long-term survival or functional class.