Literature DB >> 2988806

Inhalation studies on the effects of tremolite and brucite dust in rats.

J M Davis, J Addison, R E Bolton, K Donaldson, A D Jones, B G Miller.   

Abstract

Samples of commercially used asbestos, especially chrysotile, are frequently contaminated by small amounts of other fibrous minerals. Among these are tremolite and brucite although pure tremolite is also produced commercially in relatively small quantities. In order to determine how harmful commercially exploited tremolite might be in comparison with other asbestos types and to explore the possibility that small amounts of tremolite and brucite as contaminants could significantly affect the pathogenicity of industrially used chrysotile, long-term animal inhalation and injection studies using rats were undertaken with what were considered to be mineralogically pure samples of these minerals. Rats treated with tremolite developed very high levels of pulmonary fibrosis as well as 16 carcinomas and two mesotheliomas in a group of 39 animals. Tremolite thus proved to be the most dangerous mineral that we have studied. Animals treated with 'brucite' developed moderate levels of pulmonary fibrosis and two carcinomas. Both tremolite and brucite produced mesotheliomas in greater than 90% of animals following i.p. injection. However, it was found that the supposedly pure brucite in fact contained 10% chrysotile, a level of contamination that could well have been responsible for the pathological changes found in both inhalation and intraperitoneal injection studies. The greatest care should be exercised by industry in handling tremolite or materials contaminated with it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2988806     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/6.5.667

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  13 in total

1.  Examining play sand products for asbestos contamination.

Authors:  J S Webber; R Janulis; S Syrotynski
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 2.  State-of-the-science assessment of non-asbestos amphibole exposure: is there a cancer risk?

Authors:  Cris Williams; Linda Dell; Robert Adams; Tracie Rose; Drew Van Orden
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 4.609

3.  A commentary on Roggli's "The So-Called Short-Fiber Controversy".

Authors:  David Egilman; Triet Tran
Journal:  Int J Occup Environ Health       Date:  2016-05-24

Review 4.  Assessment of mineral fibres from human lung tissue.

Authors:  J M Davis; B Gylseth; A Morgan
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 5.  Role of mutagenicity in asbestos fiber-induced carcinogenicity and other diseases.

Authors:  Sarah X L Huang; Marie-Claude Jaurand; David W Kamp; John Whysner; Tom K Hei
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

6.  Comparisons of the pathogenicity of long and short fibres of chrysotile asbestos in rats.

Authors:  J M Davis; A D Jones
Journal:  Br J Exp Pathol       Date:  1988-10

Review 7.  Deposition and retention of inhaled fibres: effects on incidence of lung cancer and mesothelioma.

Authors:  M Lippmann
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Effects of electrostatic charge on the pathogenicity of chrysotile asbestos.

Authors:  J M Davis; R E Bolton; A N Douglas; A D Jones; T Smith
Journal:  Br J Ind Med       Date:  1988-05

Review 9.  Occupational exposure to chrysotile asbestos and cancer risk: a review of the amphibole hypothesis.

Authors:  L T Stayner; D A Dankovic; R A Lemen
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  The pathogenicity of long versus short fibre samples of amosite asbestos administered to rats by inhalation and intraperitoneal injection.

Authors:  J M Davis; J Addison; R E Bolton; K Donaldson; A D Jones; T Smith
Journal:  Br J Exp Pathol       Date:  1986-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.