Literature DB >> 29887703

Perineal Wound Complications Following Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision: Experience of a Regional Cancer Center.

Niharika Aggarwal1, Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri1, Antony Arvind2, Sunil Bhanu Jayanand1.   

Abstract

Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) results in a large perineal defect which needs reconstruction by a flap or biological mesh. The incidence of perineal wound complications is thought to be higher following an ELAPE compared to conventional abdominoperineal excision (APE). WE aimed to analyze the perineal wound complications following ELAPE in our institution. This was a retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent an APE (conventional and ELAPE) procedure in our institution between 2012 and 2015. We retrieved the demographic data, treatment data, and pathological data from the case records. Reconstruction of the perineal defect after a prone perineal dissection was performed using a local muscle flap. The incidence of perinealwound complications, hospital stay, and time to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy was compared between the two groups. A total of 71 patients underwent APE over a period of 41 months of which 21 patients underwent ELAPE. The perineal dissection during ELAPE was done in the prone position in 18 patients and in the supine position in 3 patients. Perineal wound complications were seen in 9 patients (42%) who underwent ELAPE compared to 17 patients (34%) who underwent conventional APE (p = 0.52). The mean duration of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who underwent ELAPE when compared to those who underwent conventional APE (22.9 ± 3.6 days vs 14.6 ± 1.0 days, p = 0.03). The median interval between ELAPE and initiation of adjuvant chemo was 54 days (range 32-120 days) compared to 50 days (range 30-100 days) in patients undergoing conventional APE. A delay in initiating adjuvant chemotherapy of more than 12 weeks was seen in 4 patients (19%) following ELAPE. The incidence of perineal wound complications following ELAPE in this study was comparable to that reported in literature. Although the hospital stay following ELAPE was significantly longer than that following conventional APE in our institution, it did not unduly prolong initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy. Improving the perineal reconstruction techniques and selecting patients who will benefit from ELAPE may help to reduce the wound complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circumferential resection margin (CRM); Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE); Gluteal muscle flap; Intra-op perforation (IOP); Perineal wound complications

Year:  2018        PMID: 29887703      PMCID: PMC5984859          DOI: 10.1007/s13193-018-0741-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0975-7651


  16 in total

1.  Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  N P West; C Anderin; K J E Smith; T Holm; P Quirke
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 2.  Extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the short-term outcome.

Authors:  X Zhou; T Sun; H Xie; Y Zhang; H Zeng; W Fu
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Extended abdominoperineal resection with gluteus maximus flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor for rectal cancer.

Authors:  T Holm; A Ljung; T Häggmark; G Jurell; J Lagergren
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 4.  Short-term outcome of extra-levator abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sigmar Stelzner; Gunter Hellmich; Clemens Schubert; Erik Puffer; Gunter Haroske; Helmut Witzigmann
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision over conventional abdominoperineal excision for low rectal tumor: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yue Yang; Huirong Xu; Zhenhua Shang; Shouzhen Chen; Fan Chen; Qiming Deng; Li Luo; Liang Zhu; Benkang Shi
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

6.  Outcome of extralevator abdominoperineal excision compared with standard surgery: results from a single centre.

Authors:  D Asplund; E Haglind; E Angenete
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Wound Complications and Perineal Pain After Extralevator Versus Standard Abdominoperineal Excision: A Nationwide Study.

Authors:  Emilie P Colov; Mads Klein; Ismail Gögenur
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) for rectal cancer--short-term results from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Selective use of ELAPE warranted.

Authors:  Mattias Prytz; Eva Angenete; Jan Ekelund; Eva Haglind
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Persistent perineal morbidity is common following abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Dan Asplund; Mattias Prytz; David Bock; Eva Haglind; Eva Angenete
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Extralevator abdominoperineal excision (Elape): A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Zulfiqar Hanif; Alison Bradley; Ahmed Hammad; Arijit Mukherjee
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-07-20
View more
  4 in total

1.  Continuous Negative Pressure Drainage with Intermittent Irrigation Leaded to a Risk Reduction of Perineal Surgical Site Infection Following Laparoscopic Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision for Low Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Zhongbo Han; Chunxia Yang; Qingfeng Wang; Meng Wang; Xi Li; Chao Zhang
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  Transperineal minimally invasive APE: preliminary outcomes in a multicenter cohort.

Authors:  S E van Oostendorp; S X Roodbeen; C C Chen; A Caycedo-Marulanda; H M Joshi; P J Tanis; C Cunningham; J B Tuynman; R Hompes
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Surgical Treatment of Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: Updates.

Authors:  Cristopher Varela; Nam Kyu Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2021-12-22

4.  Pelvic peritoneum reconstruction using the bladder peritoneum flap in laparoscopic extralevator abdominoperineal excision: A multi-center, prospective single-arm cohort study (IDEAL Phase 2A).

Authors:  Yu Shen; Tinghan Yang; Xiangbing Deng; Jinliang Yang; Wenjian Meng; Ziqiang Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.