Black phosphorus (bP) has been recently investigated for next generation nanoelectronic multifunctional devices. However, the intrinsic instability of exfoliated bP (the bP nanoflakes) toward both moisture and air has so far overshadowed its practical implementation. In order to contribute to fill this gap, we report here the preparation of new hybrid polymer-based materials where bP nanoflakes (bPn) exhibit a significantly improved stability. The new materials have been prepared by different synthetic paths including: (i) the mixing of conventionally liquid-phase exfoliated bP (in dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO) with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) solution; (ii) the direct exfoliation of bP in a polymeric solution; (iii) the in situ radical polymerization after exfoliating bP in the liquid monomer (methyl methacrylate, MMA). This last methodology concerns the preparation of stable suspensions of bPn-MMA by sonication-assisted liquid-phase exfoliation (LPE) of bP in the presence of MMA followed by radical polymerization. The hybrids characteristics have been compared in order to evaluate the bP dispersion and the effectiveness of the bPn interfacial interactions with polymer chains aimed at their long-term environmental stabilization. The passivation of the bPn is particularly effective when the hybrid material is prepared by in situ polymerization. By using this synthetic methodology, the nanoflakes, even if with a gradient of dispersion (size of aggregates), preserve their chemical structure from oxidation (as proved by both Raman and 31P-solid state NMR studies) and are particularly stable to air and UV light exposure. The feasibility of this approach, capable of efficiently exfoliating bP while protecting the bPn, has been then verified by using different vinyl monomers (styrene and N-vinylpyrrolidone), thus obtaining hybrids where the nanoflakes are embedded in polymer matrices with a variety of intriguing thermal, mechanical, and solubility characteristics.
Black phosphorus (bP) has been recently investigated for next generation nanoelectronic multifunctional devices. However, the intrinsic instability of exfoliated bP (the bP nanoflakes) toward both moisture and air has so far overshadowed its practical implementation. In order to contribute to fill this gap, we report here the preparation of new hybrid polymer-based materials where bP nanoflakes (bPn) exhibit a significantly improved stability. The new materials have been prepared by different synthetic paths including: (i) the mixing of conventionally liquid-phase exfoliated bP (in dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO) with poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) solution; (ii) the direct exfoliation of bP in a polymeric solution; (iii) the in situ radical polymerization after exfoliating bP in the liquid monomer (methyl methacrylate, MMA). This last methodology concerns the preparation of stable suspensions of bPn-MMA by sonication-assisted liquid-phase exfoliation (LPE) of bP in the presence of MMA followed by radical polymerization. The hybrids characteristics have been compared in order to evaluate the bP dispersion and the effectiveness of the bPn interfacial interactions with polymer chains aimed at their long-term environmental stabilization. The passivation of the bPn is particularly effective when the hybrid material is prepared by in situ polymerization. By using this synthetic methodology, the nanoflakes, even if with a gradient of dispersion (size of aggregates), preserve their chemical structure from oxidation (as proved by both Raman and 31P-solid state NMR studies) and are particularly stable to air and UV light exposure. The feasibility of this approach, capable of efficiently exfoliating bP while protecting the bPn, has been then verified by using different vinyl monomers (styrene and N-vinylpyrrolidone), thus obtaining hybrids where the nanoflakes are embedded in polymer matrices with a variety of intriguing thermal, mechanical, and solubility characteristics.
Black phosphorus (bP)
is nowadays one of most studied 2D layered
systems.[1] With its capability to form 2D
structures similar to graphene, but with electronic properties potentially
better suited to transistors or solar cells, bP and its exfoliated
derivatives, phosphorene (a single layer of bP) or bP nanoflakes (bPn),
have captured the attention of researchers around the world. Condensed
matter physicists, chemists, semiconductor device engineers, and material
scientists are in-depth studying the possible applications of bP and
bPn in different fields.[2,3] Similarly to graphite
and transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs), bP has a layered structure
but a unique puckered single-layer geometry responsible for its interesting
properties. The bPn have been reported to exhibit a high mobility
of 1000 cm2 V–1 s–1 for a sample of thickness 5 nm with high current ON/OFF ratio of
105.[4,5] In addition, due to the characteristic
P atom arrangement, the carrier mobility is anisotropic in the plane
and the direct electronic band gap depends on flake thickness.[4−6] In particular, bP is a p-type semiconductor which possesses a direct
band gap of 0.3 eV; more interestingly, the bPn has again a direct
band gap which increases up to approximately 2 eV for the monolayer.
These features make bP a promising material for novel applications
in nanoelectronic and nanophotonic devices which cover the entire
range of the visible spectrum.[3] For example,
exfoliated bPn (mechanically or via laser irradiation technique)[7,8] has been used in field emitter devices for the development of practical
electron sources. Other interesting applications concern the use of
exfoliated bP as humidity sensors[9,10] with performance
depending on the thickness/number of nanosheets and being competitive
with TMDCs[11,12]However, the literature
concerning the bP and bPn properties, their
reactivity (including also the possibility of surface functionalization
or decoring), and their stability in different environments points
out that the combination of air (oxygen), water (humidity), and light
(UV radiations) causes the easy degradation of these materials.[13−16] It is also reported that the degradation is faster with decreasing
layer number and thus flake thickness (on going from bulky bP to single
layer bPn).[17] This is for the moment one
of the main drawbacks limiting the use of this material. Therefore,
exfoliated bP has to be stabilized to prevent degradation. This has
been done through suitable coatings such as layered materials (hexagonal
boron nitride),[18] oxides (Al2O3),[19] or polymers. Among these,
polymer coating is the easiest, with particular reference to poly(methyl
methacrylate) (PMMA), which is known to efficiently preserve mechanically
exfoliated bP flakes.[7] Besides, mechanical
exfoliation of bP is not a scalable technology which limits its use
in applications.Notably, polymers have been recognized as favorable
in breaking
down the strong interlayer interactions among nanostructured layered
materials[20] to design hybrids with performance
suitable for optoelectronics or nonlinear optical (NLO) devices, chemiresistors,
temperature, and deformation sensors.[21] Depending on the possibility of establishing specific interactions,
the agglomeration of thin bP layered flakes, once generated by liquid-phase
exfoliation (LPE) technology, can be avoided by embedding them with
polymer chains, like in the case of polystyrene.[22] In addition, the final polymer nanocomposites can preserve
the structure and the properties of individual components, realize
synergistic effects between different substrates, endow new properties,
and develop devices for different applications; PEDOT:PSS, poly-l-lysine, polyaniline, and polycarbonate have been used to design
semiconductors, sensing platforms for medical detection, pseudocapacitors,
and pulsed fiber lasers[23−26] which are generally obtained by covering the bPn
surfaces or by mixing their suspension with the polymers.By
considering this scenario, the present work proposes, for the
first time, a study focused on the preparation of stabilized bPn embedded
in polymers through hybrids preparation able to maintain or even to
improve the structural properties of bP. In place of the previously
reported exfoliation methods that use a mechanical tool (scotch tape)
or LPE with nonfriendly solvents, that are difficult to remove from
the devices (as for example, dimethyl sulfoxide, DMSO), here, for
the first time, bP has been exfoliated in the PMMA matrix by using
strategies aimed at improving both the exfoliation level (phosphorene
or bPn being the target) and the structural and morphological stability
of the exfoliated material. In particular, the bP has been directly
exfoliated in the liquid vinyl monomer, the methyl methacrylate (MMA),
without solvents, and after the addition of a radical initiator, the
hybrid material has been obtained by in situ radical polymerization.
For comparison purposes, PMMA-based composites have also been prepared
by the direct bP exfoliation in polymer solution or by starting from
bPn previously exfoliated by LPE with DMSO and successively dispersed
in the PMMA matrix.These new materials have been characterized
by combining different
techniques: dynamic light scattering (DLS), Fourier transform infrared
(FTIR) and Raman spectroscopies, X-ray diffraction (XRD), 31P-solid state NMR (SSNMR), atomic force microscopy (AFM), size exclusion
chromatography (SEC), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and
thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) have been used to in-depth examine
the structural features, the morphology, and the thermal properties
of components as soon as the hybrids have been obtained and also after
several months. The collected results gather information about the
stability of the chemical structure of bPn in the polymer matrix over
time and after UV light irradiation in air. The in situ radical polymerization
has been thus used to produce hybrids starting from different vinyl
monomers, styrene (Sty), and N-vinylpyrrolidone (NVP)
to prove the feasibility and the significance of the methodology here
developed.
Experimental Section
Materials
All
the materials (polymers and reagents)
and the solvents below were used as received without further purification:
methyl methacrylate (MMA), 99% from Sigma-Aldrich, d = 0.963 mg/mL, MW: 100.12 g/mol; 1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone (NVP), ≥99%
from Sigma-Aldrich, d = 1.043 mg/mL, MW: 111.14 g/mol;
styrene (Sty), ≥99% from Sigma-Aldrich, d =
0.906 mg/mL; poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) from Sigma-Aldrich,
MW: 120 000 D; polystyrene (PS) from Repsol, MW: 164 500
D; poly(vinylpyrrolidone) (PVP) from Sigma-Aldrich, MW: 29 000
D; 2,2′-azobis(2-methylpropionitrile) (AIBN), 98% from Sigma-Aldrich,
MW: 164.21 g/mol; dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ACS reagent ≥99.5%
from Sigma-Aldrich, MW: 78.13 g/mol; chloroform, ACS reagent ≥99.8%
from Sigma-Aldrich, MW 119.38 g/mol; acetone, ACS reagent ≥99.5%
from Sigma-Aldrich, MW: 58.08 g/mol; methanol, ACS reagent 99.8% from
Sigma-Aldrich, MW: 32.04 g/mol; diethyl ether, ACS reagent ≥99.8%
from Carlo Erba (CAS: 60-29-7), MW: 74.12 g/mol; propanol, ACS reagent
≥99.5% from Sigma-Aldrich (CAS: 67-63-0), MW: 60.10 g/mol; n-heptane, ACS reagent ≥98.5% from Sigma-Aldrich,
MW: 100.2 g/mol; anisole, 99% from Sigma-Aldrich, MW: 108.14 g/mol.
Instruments and Characterization
The micro-Raman analysis
was performed using a Renishaw micro-Raman inVia instrument equipped
with a 1800 grooves/mm diffraction grating, a CCD detector, and a
50× magnifying lens. The instrument has a Nd:YAG laser source
at λ = 532 nm wavelength. The samples were analyzed as polymer
films or powder (bP); the measurements as well as the imaging were
obtained on different portions of each specimen, and the power on
the samples was about 1.5 mW.X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns
of hybrids and bP were acquired at room temperature with a PANalytical
X’PERT PRO diffractometer, employing Cu Kα radiation
(λ = 1.54187 Å) and a parabolic MPD-mirror for Cu radiation.
The diagrams were acquired in a 2θ range between 5.0° and
80.0°, using a continuous scan mode with an acquisition step
size of 0.0263° or 0.0131° and a counting time of 150 s.Dynamic light scattering (DLS) analyses were carried out at room
temperature by using the Malvern Zetasizer nano instrument (model:
ZEN1600) equipped with a HeNe laser (633 nm, 4 mW) and an avalanche
photodiode detector with an angle of 173°. The DLS data were
processed and analyzed with Dispersion Technology Software (Malvern
Instruments).Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and attenuated
total reflectance
(ATR-FTIR) spectra were recorded at room temperature with a Perkin-Elmer
Two Spectrometer equipped with an ATR accessory with diamond crystal.
The spectra were generally acquired between 4000 and 400 cm–1 with a resolution of 4 cm–1 using 16 scans.Number-average molecular weight (M̅n) and weight-average molecular weight (M̅w) as well as dispersity (Đ) were
determined using size exclusion chromatography (SEC), Agilent Technologies
1200 Series. The instrument was equipped with an Agilent degasser,
an isocratic HPLC pump, an Agilent refractive index (RI) detector,
and two PLgel 5 μm MiniMIX-D columns conditioned at 35 °C.
Chloroform (CHCl3) was used as the mobile phase at a flow
rate of 0.3 mL min–1. The system was calibrated
with polystyrene standards in a range from 500 to 3 × 105 g mol–1. Samples were dissolved in CHCl3 (2 mg mL–1) and filtered through a 0.20
μm syringe filter before analysis (twice in the case of hybrids).
Number-average molecular weight (M̅n) and weight-average molecular weight (M̅w) were calculated using the Agilent ChemStation software.Thermal gravimetric analyses (TGA) were carried out with a Seiko
EXSTAR 7200 TGA/DTA by introducing about 5–8 mg of sample in
an alumina sample pan of 70 μL. In a typical experiment, run
was carried out at a standard rate of 10 °C/min from 30 to 700
°C under nitrogen flow. Tonset and Tinfl were determined by analyzing the TG curve
(as the temperature of intercept of tangents before and after the
degradation step) and DTG curve (as the maximum of the peak), respectively.The glass transition temperature (Tg) of hybrids was determined by differential scanning calorimetry
(DSC) using a PerkinElmer DSC4000 equipped with intracooler and interfaced
with Pyris software (version 9.0.2). The range of temperatures investigated
was 40–180 °C. Thermal scans were carried out on 5–10
mg samples in aluminum pans under nitrogen atmosphere. The instrument
was calibrated by the standards In (Tm = 156.6 °C, ΔHm = 28.5 J/g)
and Pb (Tm = 327.5 °C, ΔHm = 23.03 J/g).Atomic force microscopy
(AFM) measurements were performed with
a Bruker Dimension Icon AFM, in pick force mode. Data analysis was
performed by WSxM software.[27]31P solid state NMR (SSNMR) experiments were carried
out with a Varian InfinityPlus spectrometer working at Larmor frequencies
of 400.34 Mz and 162.07 MHz for 1H and 31P nuclei,
respectively. Spectra were acquired using a 3.2 mm probe head, exploiting
the direct excitation (DE) pulse sequence, under high power decoupling
from 1H nuclei, using a recycle delay of 120 s and accumulating
a number of transients between 100 and 3000. All the experiments were
carried out under magic angle spinning (MAS), with a frequency of
10 kHz, using air as spinning gas, and at a temperature of 20 °C. 31P chemical shift scale was referred to the signal of H3PO4 (85%) at 0 ppm.
bP and bPn Suspensions
Preparation and Characterization
Black phosphorus (bP) and
phosphorene (bPn) suspension in DMSO (DMSO_bPn, rH = 500 ± 23 nm) were prepared as previously
described,[16] and TGA, XRD, and Raman spectroscopy
results agreed with reported data.[22] A
compendium concerning the novel Raman analyses of bP is reported in
the Supporting Information (Figure S1): the unexfoliated bP crystals show
the three characteristic peaks of modes Ag1,
B2g, and Ag2 with a shift in peak
positions depending on the number of layers. In agreement with data
already reported in the literature,[14,16,17,28] the observation of
sharper peaks, which were weakly shifted toward higher wavenumbers,
was taken as evidence for crystalline, thin bP sheets.MMA_bPn,
NVP_bPn, and Sty_bPn suspensions were obtained by LPE in the presence
of the sole monomer. In a typical procedure, ∼5 mg of bP, carefully
crushed in a mortar, was put in a test tube and then a weighted quantity
of MMA, Sty, or NVP was added. The monomer bP suspension was sonicated
for 90 min by using a Hielscher Ultrasonic Processor (UP220 St) instrument,
equipped with Sonotrode (diameter: 2 mm; 26 ± kHz). The amplitude
of ultrasound wave was maintained constant at 50% with P = 7 W. In all cases, an ice bath was used to avoid overheating of
the system. The final MMA_bPn, NVP_bPn, and Sty_bPn suspensions were
then insufflated with N2 for 15 min. All the suspensions
were analyzed by DLS, showing rH values
really close to that of DMSO_bPn. For example, the MMA_bPn suspension
(having about 1% of bP content) was characterized by rH = 512 ± 58 nm.By supposing that the whole phosphorus
amount was maintained in the composite.
Hybrid Materials Preparation
Three different methodologies
were employed (see Figure S2).
Method A:
Dispersion of DMSO_bPn Suspension in PMMA Solution
Into a
100 mL two-necked round-bottom flask, equipped with a magnetic
stirrer and previously degassed, backfilled three times with nitrogen,
and then left under nitrogen, 25 mL of CHCl3 and 0.523
g of PMMA (commercial product) were loaded. The solution was magnetically
stirred for 10 min in a continuous stream of N2 until the
polymer was completely dissolved. Under a N2 current, the
DMSO_bPn suspension (rH = 500 ± 23
nm) was added dropwise. The mixture was left stirring under N2 for 15 min, and then, the mixing stopped. A DLS measurement
of polymeric suspension provided a value of rH = 894.3 ± 11.5 nm. The flask content, a yellow/brown
solution, was precipitated (dropwise) into 400 mL of MeOH. The polymer
was then filtered and dried under vacuum until a constant weight (0.430
g) was achieved. By considering that the DMSO_bPn suspension was prepared
by using 5 mg of bP, the content of phosphorus derivative in the composite
(entry PMMA_bP_A) was estimated as 1.0% wt on the basis of starting
amount.
Method B: LPE of bP in PMMA Solution
Five mg of bP
was put into a test tube; then, a polymer solution containing 0.513
g of PMMA (commercial product) in 30 mL of a mixture of acetone/DMSO
(2/1) was added to the powder. The ultrasonication process was carried
out for 3 h, by varying the amplitude of the ultrasound wave between
50% and 100%, with a power of 5–9 W. A DLS measurement of polymeric
suspension provided a value of rH = 427.3
± 96.4 nm. The collected dispersion with yellow-brown color was
coprecipitated in 400 mL of MeOH. The solid fraction was then recovered
via filtration and dried under vacuum until a constant weight was
achieved. The content of phosphorus derivatives in the composite (entry
PMMA_bP_B) was estimated as 1.0% wt on the basis of starting amount.
The same treatment (solubilization and sonication) was applied to
PMMA (commercial product) without adding the bP to recover a blank
sample (entry PMMA_B_blank) used for comparison purposes.
Method C:
In Situ Radical Polymerization
A Schlenk
tube (10 mL) equipped with a magnetic stirrer and previously degassed,
backfilled three times with nitrogen, and then left under nitrogen
was loaded with the MMA_bPn or Sty_bPn or NVP_bPn suspensions (previously
prepared). A weighted amount of AIBN (2 wt % with respect to the monomer)
was added, and the tube was placed in an oil bath (temperature and
time of polymerization depending of vinyl monomer used, as summarized
in Table ). The product
was then dissolved in CHCl3 and precipitated in an appropriate
solvent to remove unreacted monomer and polymerization byproducts:
MeOH was used for PMMA and PS, while Et2O, for PNVP. After
recovering via filtration, the resulting powder was dried under vacuum
until a constant weight was achieved. The amount of phosphorus derivatives
in each composite was determined on the basis of the polymerization
yield (ranging from 85% to 60%) and its starting amount. With the
same experimental conditions, MMA, Sty, and NVP were polymerized to
provide comparative samples obtained without bP (entries: PMMA_C_blank;
PS_C_blank; PNVP_C_blank).
Table 1
In Situ Radical Polymerization
Runs:
Experimental Conditions and Final Composition of Composites
entry
monomer (g)
bP (g)
T (°C)
time (min)
final content of P (wt %)a
PMMA_bP_C
MMA (0.94)
0.0055
70
180
0.8
PS_bP_C
Sty (0.91)
0.0053
80
180
0.8
PS_bP_C2
Sty (3.62)
0.0055
80
180
0.2
PNVP_bP_C
NVP (1.04)
0.0050
75
150
0.7
PNVP_bP_C2
NVP (4.16)
0.0063
75
150
0.3
By supposing that the whole phosphorus
amount was maintained in the composite.
A schematic representation summarizing
the different procedures is reported in Figure S2. In addition, a physical mixture between bP and PMMA (1
wt %) was prepared to be analyzed by 31P-SSNMR and XRD.All the samples were analyzed by SEC, DSC, and TGA and PMMA-based
hybrids, by 31P-SSNMR. In addition, all the composites
were even molded into films, by using a press Carver bench model 4386
(T = 180 °C, 10–20 kg/cm2),
with constant and uniform thickness = 40–90 μm to be
analyzed by XRD, Raman, and FTIR-ATR. Photodegradation of PMMA_bP_C
and PMMA_C_blank was studied using a UV–vis camera (UvaCube400,
400 W, Hoenle) equipped with a Hg lamp (high pressure mercury lamp
with a power of 400 W: emittance230–285 = 15 mW/cm2; emittance330–400 = 11 mW/cm2; emittance380–500 = 35 mW/cm2). The
samples were irradiated for 250 min from one side. In addition, a
solution of the sample PMMA_bP_C in anisole (23 mg/2 mL) was spin
coated at 4000 rpm (rpm) for 1 min, after an acceleration step at
500 rpm for 5 s, and analyzed by AFM. The samples PNVP_bP_C and PS_bP_C
were solubilized by water and anisole, respectively, and films provided
by solution casting were analyzed by Raman.
Results and Discussion
PMMA-Based
Hybrid Materials
The different methodologies
used to prepare the hybrid material (schematized in Figure S2) can be summarized as follows: (i) embedding of
the already exfoliated bP (by conventional LPE) in PMMA; (ii) exfoliation
of bP by PMMA solution; (iii) LPE of bP by monomer (MMA, Sty, NVP)
followed by in situ radical polymerization. These synthetic approaches
were designed and realized with the dual objective of achieving a
good dispersion of bP, i.e., obtaining thin flakes or few layers flakes
and, at the same time, protecting them from the degradation that is
known to occur when bP nanoflakes are exposed to air and light. The
main target of the study was the achievement of a processable, soluble,
and stable hybrid material that contains thin bP flakes, or a few
layer flakes, whose structure can be preserved for long time.The structural and thermal properties of PMMA matrix in the hybrids
were investigated by FTIR, Raman, SEC, TGA, and DSC (Figure and Table ). The FTIR and Raman spectra of the samples
showed all the characteristic absorption bands of PMMA matrix, whose
attributions are reported in Table S1.[29] No differences in the FTIR spectra of composites
with respect to the spectrum of commercial sample or blank experiment
were highlighted (see Figure A, as an example) suggesting that the different synthetic
paths and the presence of bP or bPn did not cause significant variations
in the chemical structure of PMMA. Notably, FTIR spectra did not show
any additional absorption bands due to bP. Raman spectra (Figure B) confirmed the
presence of PMMA showing all the main absorptions peaks of the matrix
(Table S1), which were not changed by the
presence of bP derivatives. In addition, these spectra showed distinct
signals of bPn (between 300 and 500 cm–1) whose
intensities and Raman shifts depended on the methodology used for
the preparation of the samples (as discussed later).
Figure 1
(A) FTIR spectra of commercial
PMMA and of samples PMMA_C_blank
and PMMA_bP_C. (B) Raman spectra of matrices (PMMA and PMMA_C_blank)
and of hybrids obtained by different methods (dotted box highlights
the bP signals and confirms their presence in all hybrids).
Table 2
Molecular Weight
Evolution and Thermal
Features of PMMA-Based Samples
sample
M̅n (D)
M̅w (D)
Tg (°C)
Tonset (°C)a
Tinfl (°C)b
PMMA
52 000
101 000
105.0c
264
290–387
PMMA_bP_A
56 000
97 000
115.6
279
294–394
PMMA_B_blank
57 000
90 000
108.7
267
285–390
PMMA_bP_B
49 000
80 000
115.1
280
294–395
PMMA_C_blank
45 000
103 000
120.6
272
287–381
PMMA_bP_C
58 000
198 000
121.0
269
293–372
Intercept of tangents before and
after degradation step.
From DTG curves as the maximum of
the peak.
From technical
sheet.
(A) FTIR spectra of commercial
PMMA and of samples PMMA_C_blank
and PMMA_bP_C. (B) Raman spectra of matrices (PMMA and PMMA_C_blank)
and of hybrids obtained by different methods (dotted box highlights
the bP signals and confirms their presence in all hybrids).Intercept of tangents before and
after degradation step.From DTG curves as the maximum of
the peak.From technical
sheet.The SEC analysis
(Table ) showed that
the PMMA phase of the hybrids prepared by Method
A and Method B has the same or similar M̅n with respect to its reference (i.e., PMMA and PMMA_B_blank,
respectively) with only a weak decrease of M̅w for samples obtained by Method B. This result indicates
a possible degradation of polymer chains induced by the prolonged
sonication treatment. Conversely, the sample PMMA_bP_C, prepared by
in situ radical polymerization, was characterized by a remarkably
higher value of both the average molecular weights. This experimental
evidence can be explained by the hindrance in movement of the growing
macroradicals which inhibits the termination reactions and thus increases
the length of polymer chains.[30] This confinement
effect confirms that the growth of PMMA macromolecules occurred near
or onto the bPn surfaces or possibly between the layers of bP and
promoted an effective embedding of flakes with the polymer chains.AFM analysis of films obtained by spin coating of PMMA_bP_C anisole
solution corroborated the evidence of strong interactions and entanglement
between polymer chains and bPn. PMMA fractions densely aggregated
and formed a net around smaller particles that showed the characteristic
Raman peaks of bP. An example of these hybrid PMMA/bP aggregates is
reported in Figure ; the “plateau” area visible in Figure a is 4 nm higher
than the surrounding PMMA thin film and 4–5 μm wide (Figure d), while the bPn
is inhomogeneous and up to 200 nm high, as shown in Figure e. Zooming in and rescaling
the image to properly see the flake (Figure b), we can observe that the 1 μm bPn
is indeed an aggregate of smaller structures. This inhomogeneity,
as well as the height difference between the bP aggregate and the
plateau, is even more evident from the 3D visualization (Figure c). Therefore, sample
PMMA_bP_C actually contains a portion of PMMA strongly interacting
with the bP flakes. It presumably grew up from the layers within the
same flake and is characterized by higher molecular weight. Even if
only a few literature examples of bP covalent functionalization are
reported, we cannot completely exclude that bP sites (presumably the
P apical atoms) are involved in MMA polymerization, by generating
P–C bonds.[31] The reactivity of elemental
white phosphorus with carbon-centered radicals is well-known[32] and its use as alkyl radical trap is well-documented;[33] in addition, some weak hypothesis about the
radical reaction of bP with aryl radicals (derived from diazonium
compounds) was recently discussed as capable of generating P–C
covalent bonds.[34,35]
Figure 2
AFM analysis of a film obtained by spin
coating of PMMA_bP_C anisole
solution. The film has a thickness of approximately 20 nm, as measured
by a stylus profilometer. Panel (a) shows a small aggregate of bP
surrounded by a several micron-wide “plateau”. This
“plateau” is composed of densely packed polymer chains,
aggregated around the bP structure. (b) Zoom-in taken in the region
indicated by the square box in (a). It displays the bP structure,
which appears as an aggregate of individual bP flakes. (c) 3D representation
of the region of interest of (a), which allows one to appreciate the
difference in height between the “plateau” and the bP.
(d) Cross section of the “plateau” taken along the line
shown in (a). The “plateau” is ∼4 nm higher than
the surrounding area. (e) Cross section of the bP aggregate, along
the line shown in (b), displays the height of the bP aggregate, up
to approximately 200 nm, and its inhomogeneity.
AFM analysis of a film obtained by spin
coating of PMMA_bP_C anisole
solution. The film has a thickness of approximately 20 nm, as measured
by a stylus profilometer. Panel (a) shows a small aggregate of bP
surrounded by a several micron-wide “plateau”. This
“plateau” is composed of densely packed polymer chains,
aggregated around the bP structure. (b) Zoom-in taken in the region
indicated by the square box in (a). It displays the bP structure,
which appears as an aggregate of individual bP flakes. (c) 3D representation
of the region of interest of (a), which allows one to appreciate the
difference in height between the “plateau” and the bP.
(d) Cross section of the “plateau” taken along the line
shown in (a). The “plateau” is ∼4 nm higher than
the surrounding area. (e) Cross section of the bP aggregate, along
the line shown in (b), displays the height of the bP aggregate, up
to approximately 200 nm, and its inhomogeneity.All hybrids showed an increase of Tg value with respect to their blank experiment or reference
(Table ) suggesting
a reinforcing
effect due to nanofiller addition; however, this increment occurred
with a really low extent for the run obtained by in situ polymerization
(Method C) suggesting for this sample a finer and homogeneous dispersion
of flakes. The same trend was observed for the TGA results. Notably,
the composites provided by Methods A and B showed a certain improvement
in their thermal stability with respect to both the onset and inflection
temperatures, in agreement with results already[22] PMMA_bP_C has a thermal behavior similar to that of blank
sample, suggesting the formation of an interpenetrated phase in which
the two components (polymer and filler) are really entangled at the
molecular level without distinguishable effects in regards to bulk
thermal properties (the TGA curves are reported in Figure S3).The optical microscopy coupled with Raman
was used to investigate
the morphology of the samples; the imaging of portions of each specimen
showed a different flakes distribution, depending on the preparation
method (Figure ).
PMMA_bP_A showed a good homogeneous distribution of tiny particles
(below 1 μm) resembling the bPn and a really small amount of
larger aggregates (see an example on the right of Figure A). Instead, the PMMA_bP_B
sample seemed to be characterized by the presence of very large inclusions
(Figure B), even if
the measured rH of the polymeric suspension
is comparable with that of DMSO_bPn (see Experimental
Section). Notably, a finer dispersion of bP was achieved in
the case of PMMA_bP_C since tiny particles and flakes, homogeneously
distributed, were observed and only a small fraction of larger aggregates
(of several μm) was found (see an example on the right of Figure C).
Figure 3
Magnified visual images
of hybrids produced by Methods A, B, and
C, collected by optical microscope and showing the particles’
distribution and their dimensions.
Magnified visual images
of hybrids produced by Methods A, B, and
C, collected by optical microscope and showing the particles’
distribution and their dimensions.Raman spectra were collected in different portions of the
samples
to focus on the structure and distribution of flakes. A comparison
of representative spectra collected for all the hybrids is reported
in Figure S4. All the samples showed signals
confirming the presence of bP, which suggest that most of the nanostructured
material survived the methodology used for the hybrid synthesis, even
if in the case of sample prepared by Method A not all the detected
flakes exhibited the characteristic Raman peaks of bP structure. Similar
behavior was observed for sample PMMA_bP_B for which only the large
particles showed very intense signals attributable to bP; while in
the case of sample PMMA_bP_C, almost all the observed flakes exhibited
the Ag1, B2g, and Ag2 modes.[14,16,17,28] In addition, the spectrum of Raman active
flakes of sample PMMA_bP_A showed a blue-shift in peak positions (Figure S4), suggesting the presence of thinner
flakes,[9,28] in agreement with the morphological evidence.Interestingly, from inspection of the structural features of flakes
detected in samples provided by Methods B and C, it was found that
the intensity of bP peaks compared to those of polymer was different
and depended on the spot investigated. PMMA_bP_B showed a remarkable
decrease of bP signal intensity by moving from the particle to the
apparently neat polymer; moreover, Raman spectra of larger particles
(several microns) did not evidence the typical polymer signals, according
to poor efficiency in the bP embedding in the polymer matrix (Figure A, spectrum (a)).
Instead, the spectra of PMMA_bP_C disclosed, in all the analyzed portions,
the vibration modes of both the components, bP and polymer, with comparable
relative intensity (Figure B). Smaller particles/aggregates or apparently neat polymer
portions were characterized by bP signals shifted toward higher frequency.
This evident blue-shift of the Ag2 mode (suggested
as the most sensitive indicator of layer number[9,36])
and the decrease of intensity with respect to the reference PMMA band
(see Figure C) confirmed
for this sample the presence of almost homogeneously distributed thinner
flakes (or bPn), consistent with the observations concerning the morphological
features of the different hybrids discussed above. We speculate that
the growth of polymer chains near or between the nanolayers, which
is typical of the in situ polymerization technique, allows the moving
away of bP layers and thus the obtainment of thinner flakes.
Figure 4
Representative
images and Raman spectra collected in point indicated
by letters (a), (b), and (c) of (A) sample PMMA_bP_B and (B) sample
PMMA_bP_C; (C) enlargement of Raman spectra in the region of bP modes
for PMMA_bP_C sample (dotted line is guide for the eyes).
Representative
images and Raman spectra collected in point indicated
by letters (a), (b), and (c) of (A) sample PMMA_bP_B and (B) sample
PMMA_bP_C; (C) enlargement of Raman spectra in the region of bP modes
for PMMA_bP_C sample (dotted line is guide for the eyes).Solid state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR)
spectroscopy is
at present one of the best techniques to characterize structural and
dynamic properties of solid materials, over wide spatial and time
ranges and independently of their amorphous or crystalline character.[37]31P-MAS spectra (with or without 1HHPD) were recorded to characterize bPn after embedding in
PMMA. In the literature, only a few examples of 31P-MAS
spectra of bP are reported[38−40] while, to the best of our knowledge,
these are the first spectra of hybrids materials containing bP. Figure shows the 31P-MAS spectra of bP physically mixed with PMMA (see Experimental Section) used as reference sample and of PMMA
hybrids, prepared by using the different methodologies.
Figure 5
31P-MAS NMR spectra of (a) physical mixture between
PMMA and bP, (b) PMMA_bP_B, (c) PMMA_bP_C, and (d) PMMA_bP_A. Differently
from spectra (b)–(d), spectrum (a) was recorded without HPD
from 1H nuclei. The inset of each spectrum shows the fitting
of the bP signal resonating at 18.5 ppm.
31P-MAS NMR spectra of (a) physical mixture between
PMMA and bP, (b) PMMA_bP_B, (c) PMMA_bP_C, and (d) PMMA_bP_A. Differently
from spectra (b)–(d), spectrum (a) was recorded without HPD
from 1H nuclei. The inset of each spectrum shows the fitting
of the bP signal resonating at 18.5 ppm.The spectrum of bP physically mixed with PMMA (Figure (a)) showed a signal at 18.5
ppm, consistent with the few bP NMR spectral data reported in the
literature.[38−40] Moreover, two small signals were present at 0.8 ppm
(singlet) and 7.5 ppm (doublet, with a J(P–H) = 350 Hz), mainly ascribable to H3PO4 and
H3PO3 species, respectively.[40,41] These signals indicate that some oxidation effects occurred, even
if to a small extent (the total area of H3PO4 and H3PO3 signals account for 6% and 3%, respectively,
of the whole spectral area). The presence of oxidized species is likely
due to the chemical adsorption of oxygen on the bP surface[42] which was not protected, forming aging products.All the hybrids materials showed the signal of bP at ca. 18.5 ppm
and several peaks in the 0–15 ppm spectral region, ascribable
to oxidation products, mainly H3PO4 and H3PO3, but possibly also other phosphates and oxidized
species.[43,44] Moreover, in the spectra of PMMA_bP_B and
PMMA_bP_C, weak signals were present in the region −3 to −20
ppm, with a peak at −11 ppm, ascribable to pyrophosphate.[41] For samples PMMA_bP_A and PMMA_bP_B, the intensity
of the signals of the oxidized products was relatively high, about
75% and 71% of total spectral intensity, respectively, suggesting
extensive degradation of bPn in the conditions used for the sample
preparations (Methods A and B; see Figure S2) and in agreement with the observation that not all bP flakes in
these samples were Raman active. Instead, the spectrum of the sample
prepared by in situ polymerization, Method C (PMMA_bP_C), showed a
higher intensity of the bP signal and a lower intensity of the signals
due to the degradation products (about 68% and 32%, respectively).
From these results, it appears evident that Method C better preserved
the bPn structure. Conversely, Method A involved the use of previously
exfoliated bP that was coprecipitated in a solvent after mixing with
the polymer solution. Thin flakes easily underwent degradation/oxidation
during the workup, particularly during the treatment with solvents
upon prolonged sonication. Sample prepared by Method B was sonicated
for a longer time (3 h). Although this procedure was necessary to
boost the bP exfoliation in the polymer solution, the fact that we
could not operate under inert atmosphere rendered this methodology
less suited to guarantee the complete bP structure preservation. Instead,
the LPE in the MMA monomer carried out under milder conditions and
the subsequent in situ radical polymerization provided the best results
in terms of bPn structure stability. In addition, the presence of
weak signals in the region 10 to −20 ppm could be ascribed
to alkyl-phosphorus species originating from the reaction between
organic radicals and bP or bPn.Remarkably, in the spectrum
of the physical mixture between PMMA
and bP, the bP signal at 18.5 ppm shows an asymmetric shape, observed
also in the already reported bP spectra. Indeed, by exploiting a spectral
fitting procedure, the signal at 18.5 ppm could be deconvoluted in
two peaks, the first with a chemical shift of 18–19 ppm (line
width of 450–550 Hz) and the second at 20–21 ppm (line
width of 800–1000 Hz; see inset in Figure ). The intensity ratio between these two
peaks was about 60:40. Approximately the same result was obtained
for PMMA_bP_C (inset of Figure ), suggesting that the exfoliation degree did not substantially
affect the chemical shift and the shape of the 31P NMR
signal.The bP NMR signal of PMMA_bP_A and PMMA_bP_B appears
even more
asymmetric, as confirmed by a 40:60 intensity ratio between the peaks
at about 18–19 and 20–21 ppm, as determined from spectral
fitting (insets of Figure ). Considering that these two samples, even if exfoliated
to a different extent, present a similarly high degree of oxidation,
this result suggests that a large degradation could also affect the
signal of nonoxidized phosphorus atoms, increasing the component at
higher chemical shift.X-ray diffraction analysis was used to
characterize the crystalline
forms of neat bP (mixed with PMMA) and after being dispersed in the
hybrids. The typical XRD patterns collected at room temperature in
the scanning range of 5° < 2θ < 60° are reported
in Figure . Broad
bands at 2θ = 13.8°, 30°, and 41.6° were observed
for all the samples, confirming the amorphous nature of polymer.[45] The XRD pattern of the physical mixture PMMA/bB
(Figure (a)), having
composition similar to that of the hybrids, showed the typical bP
diffraction peaks of (020), (040), and (060),[46] centered at 2θ: 16.90°, 34.19°, and 52.34°,
respectively. The same characteristic diffraction peaks were present
in the XRD patterns of the hybrids. Moreover, it was evident that
the intensity of the peaks associated with the crystalline fraction
of bP along the z direction was different, suggesting
a different degree of order in this direction, likely meaning that
the average number of piled layers was not the same and depended on
the kind of sample. In fact, the preparation methodologies are responsible
of the content of bP able to preserve its structure and of the content
of exfoliated bP (bPn) whose nanoflakes theoretically should not be
ordered and piled.[46]
Figure 6
XRD patterns of a physical
mixture between (a) PMMA and bP, (b)
PMMA_bP_B, (c) PMMA_bP_C, and (d) PMMA_bP_A.
XRD patterns of a physical
mixture between (a) PMMA and bP, (b)
PMMA_bP_B, (c) PMMA_bP_C, and (d) PMMA_bP_A.More in detail, the sample PMMA_bP_B showed intense narrow
peaks,
as it can be seen by comparing the signal at 16.90° with the
broad band associated with PMMA. Even if from the experimental evidence
collected by 31P-MAS NMR analysis the preparation methodology
used here (Method B) was probably not able to well preserve the bP
structure (most of bP seemed to be oxidized), the “surviving”
flakes maintained their crystallinity and orientation. The presence
of large aggregates was, indeed, also proved by micro Raman analysis,
confirming the poor effectiveness of the method in promoting an extensive
exfoliation of bP. In other words, these results confirm the poor
exfoliation degree of this sample. The sample PMMA_bP_A showed less
intense peaks which resembled those already observed for bPn[47,48] even if the content of nonoxidized bP with respect to the degraded
portions, as evaluated by NMR, was similar to that of sample PMMA_bP_B.
This result implies that Method A, starting from suspension of bPn,
provided composites with more exfoliated morphology, as suggested
also by Raman results. In addition, by repeating the XRD analysis
after 6 months (Figure S5), we obtained
a completely superimposable curve, assessing that, once embedded into
the PMMA, the bPn with a certain order degree is stable and the polymer
is able to preserve its structure.[22]The sample PMMA_bP_C showed narrow peaks more intense than those
of PMMA_bP_A but less intense than those of PMMA_bP_B. On the basis
of its highly preserved bP content, assessed by SSNMR (the oxidized/degraded
fraction is less than 1/3 of those of hybrids obtained by Methods
A and B), the XRD profile suggested nice output in terms of bP dispersion
level and suitability of the Method C which can be stated to boost
the bP exfoliation and at the same time to preserve the chemical nature
and structure of bP nanoflakes.The stability upon exposure
to air and light was also tested by
repeating the Raman analysis after 6–10 months from sample
preparation and even after prolonged solubilization of the sample
in anisole. Raman spectra collected on different portions of each
specimen (films obtained by compression molding or solution casting)
clearly showed the characteristic modes of bP whose intensity and
Raman shifts depended on the thickness of flakes: both thicker flakes
and polymer portions without visible inclusions evidenced the bP peaks
confirming that also thinner flakes (bPn) were not fully etched nor
chemically modified after long exposure of the hybrid to air and light
(Figure S6).To better assess the
bPn stability in ambient conditions, the photodegradation
induced by UV light irradiation of samples produced by Method C was
qualitatively studied. The polymer films of PMMA_C_blank and PMMA_bP_C
samples were irradiated in air at room temperature with a UV–vis
lamp at different times, and the resulting sample was analyzed by
Raman and FTIR-ATR spectroscopies (Figures and S7, respectively)
following a recently reported similar approach.[22,49] The UV light (280 nm) was proved to cause the maximum degradation
of mechanically exfoliated bP flakes (of 20–30 nm thickness),
followed by blue light, owing to generation of reactive oxygen species
(ROS) participating in bP photo-oxidation.[49] The formation of such species and the role of environmental factors
on the photo-oxidation extent were already discussed in the literature,
by proposing the bP nanoflakes degradation mechanism and the use of
imidazonium salts as effective ROS quenchers.[50−53]
Figure 7
Raman spectra of PMMA_bP_C at different
times of UV exposure (enlargements
in the region of bP modes); curves labeled (a) are referred to visible
flakes or aggregates; curves labeled (b) are referred to free/clean
portions (without inclusions) of film.
Raman spectra of PMMA_bP_C at different
times of UV exposure (enlargements
in the region of bP modes); curves labeled (a) are referred to visible
flakes or aggregates; curves labeled (b) are referred to free/clean
portions (without inclusions) of film.Raman spectra of PMMA_bP_C hybrid were recorded by visually
heading
toward a clean part of specimen (apparently without aggregates, curves
labeled (b) in Figure ) and toward a flake (curve (a) in Figure ). After 250 min of exposure, the ATR spectra
of both samples (blank run and hybrid) showed the characteristic vibration
modes due to oxidation and degradation effects (Figure S7), i.e., absorptions in the region of OH, significant
broadening of C=O stretching (see the inset in Figure S7) and loss of sharpness in the region
of fingerprints due to multiple absorptions of oxidized species. In
addition, a clear yellow toning for PMMA_C_blank confirmed the degradation
effects (see films images before and after UV irradiation on the right
of Figure S7).The Raman analysis
(Figure ) during time
of exposure revealed a general loss of the spectra
resolution as a consequence of polymer degradation. Even after the
hybrid underwent a 250 min UV irradiation, the signals due to the
presence of bPn (thinner flakes, curves (b)) were clearly observed,
confirming the great stability of nanoflakes once incorporated in
the PMMA.[22,49]These results confirm the effectiveness
of the synthetic approach
in preserving the bP nanoflakes structure. It is well-known from the
literature[50−52] that bP damage is caused by ROS generated by UV light
in the presence of oxygen. The polymer chains (PMMA) embedding the
nanoflakes protected bPn from oxidation. This was demonstrated by
the fact that the UV irradiation of hybrid material provoked the oxidation
of PMMA (as clearly shown by ATR), but it had no effect on the bP
(as shown by Raman), even by considering the signals attributed to
thin flakes; thus, we can reasonably conclude that the photogenerated
ROS were not able to access the bP surfaces owing to the PMMA sequestration.
PS- and PNVP-Based Hybrid Materials
In summary, the
in situ radical polymerization after LPE of bP in MMA (Method C) was
here shown as an effective method to provide hybrid PMMA-based materials
containing bPn (by promoting the exfoliation of bP) and whose structure
was preserved (i) during the preparation steps, (ii) after storage
in ambient condition for prolonged time, (iii) owing to different
thermal and solvent treatment, and (iv) even when subjected to UV
aging. In addition, the procedure is simple if compared with other
methods and does not involve extensive use of solvents and sonication.
To test the feasibility of the method and the possibility to prepare
hybrids with different polymers, the in situ radical polymerization
of Sty and NVP was carried out (Table ). Two different contents of bP were used for these
runs: the hybrids were characterized by SEC, DSC, TGA, Raman, and
FTIR-ATR spectroscopies, and the results were compared to those of
their blank experiments (Table ). In the case of PS hybrids, a bimodal shape of MW distribution
curves was observed together with a certain increase of the M̅w values, presumably due to confinement
of growing macroradicals, as previously discussed for a similar PMMA-based
sample. These observations suggest that also Sty can establish interactions
with bP layers, and such interactions are effective for bP exfoliation.
In addition, no significant variation concerning the thermal features
of all hybrids was observed with respect to blank experiments with
the exception of the Tg values which seemed
to weakly increase depending on the bP content.
Table 3
Molecular Weight Evolution and Thermal
Features of PS and PNVP-Based Samplesa
sample
M̅n (D)
M̅m (D)
Tg (°C)
Tonset (°C)b
Tinfl (°C)c
PS_C_blank
25 700
56 700
100.7
374
418
PS_bP_C
24 600
85 200
99.8
380
417
PS_bP_C2
21 000
68 100
100.2
375
414
PNVP_C_blank
nd
nd
160.0
410
440
PNVP_bP_C
nd
nd
166.3
410
440
PNVP_bP_C2
nd
nd
163.2
412
437
nd: not determined.
Intercept
of tangents.
From DTG curves
as the maximum of
the peak.
nd: not determined.Intercept
of tangents.From DTG curves
as the maximum of
the peak.Both PS- and PNVP-based
materials were analyzed as films obtained
by compression molding. FT-IR spectra showed the vibration modes characteristic
of the polymer matrices, whereas the Raman spectra evidenced the typical
signature peaks of bP in addition to those of polymers (FTIR and Raman
spectra and related attributions are reported in Figure S8 and Tables S2 and S3).[54,55] Moreover, the Raman signals shape and shifts were in agreement with
results previously discussed for PMMA-based hybrids. These data confirmed
that the synthetic procedure is able to preserve the bP structure,
even when different monomers are employed, and to obtain systems potentially
suitable for designing devices, which are generally provided by more
complex synthetic procedures.[56]After
storing the samples in ambient conditions for 6 months, the
hybrids PS_bP_C and PNVP_bP_C were solubilized in anisole and water,
respectively, and films were obtained by solution casting onto glass.
They were carefully analyzed by Raman microscopy (Figure ). Both polymers protected
the bP flakes, and the Raman spectra collected in the different parts
of the specimen showed the characteristic vibration modes of phosphorus
flakes, visible everywhere, although with a different relative intensity.
A fine morphology with a good distribution of the particles was found
especially for the sample PNVP_bP_C, which was obtained by water casting.
The microscopic images showed in this case only small and homogeneously
dispersed inclusions. Interestingly, for all the inclusions, the Raman
spectrum revealed the diagnostic peaks of bP even though the sample
was treated with water without protection from air and light. This
result definitely underlines the feasibility and the power of the
method in stabilizing bPn as it is prepared and even after different
manipulation.
Figure 8
Visual imaging and Raman spectra of (A) PS_bP_C and (B)
PNVP_bP_C,
collected at different points of the specimen. Insets: pictures of
films obtained on glasses by solution casting from anisole for hybrid
PS_bP_C and from water for PNVP_bP_C.
Visual imaging and Raman spectra of (A) PS_bP_C and (B)
PNVP_bP_C,
collected at different points of the specimen. Insets: pictures of
films obtained on glasses by solution casting from anisole for hybrid
PS_bP_C and from water for PNVP_bP_C.
Conclusions
Hybrid materials were obtained by dispersing
black phosphorus nanoflakes
in polymer matrices through different synthetic strategies with the
aim of promoting the exfoliation of bP while protecting the generated
nanostructures from oxidation. All the composites ensued processable
and their films, obtained by compression molding, were analyzed by
FTIR, Raman, 31P-SSNMR, XRD, SEC, TGA, and DSC to pinpoint
the structural characteristics of both phases: the polymer matrix
and the bPn. In addition, a deep investigation about the bPn stability,
upon different treatments of prepared films (melt processing, solvent
solubilization, and UV light irradiation), was performed. Raman, 31P-SSNMR, and XRD analyses evidenced that, depending on the
preparation methodology, the hybrids were characterized by a different
exfoliation degree and by a different content of bP oxidized species.
The procedure comprising the liquid-phase exfoliation (LPE) in the
vinyl monomer followed by in situ radical polymerization provided
hybrid polymer-based materials with good dispersion of bP (particularly
by using MMA and NVP) and protected bP nanoflakes. The monomer LPE
seems capable of promoting the exfoliation of bP, and the following
in situ polymerization encapsulates the nanoflakes, preserving their
structure. By taking into account that, to-date, bPn are prepared
in low quantities by mechanical exfoliation, this strategy seems to
be a promising tool to easily provide larger amounts of exfoliated
bP. In addition, by considering that the nanoflakes cannot survive
for a long time in air, light, and humidity and that, once generated,
bPn have to be passivated by polymer coating, this approach emerges
as a new strategy to provide bPn already protected by enveloping the
native nanostructures with polymer chains. Therefore, the methodology
here realized is able to preserve the bPn structure not only from
air and light exposure but also from thermal and solvent treatment.This approach affords the opportunity to obtain scalable quantities
of bPn, opening the way for an easier design of (optoelectronic) devices.
Moreover, since PMMA is the most used resist for electron beam lithography,
solutions of the PMMA nanocomposites can be directly spin-coated without
further processing, and the bPn within can be processed into devices
without the need of a protective environment for fabrication.[57]
Authors: Adam H Woomer; Tyler W Farnsworth; Jun Hu; Rebekah A Wells; Carrie L Donley; Scott C Warren Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Xi Ling; Han Wang; Shengxi Huang; Fengnian Xia; Mildred S Dresselhaus Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-03-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: A Ng; T E Sutto; B R Matis; Y Deng; P D Ye; R M Stroud; T H Brintlinger; N D Bassim Journal: Nanotechnology Date: 2017-02-24 Impact factor: 3.874
Authors: Matteo Vanni; Marco Bellini; Silvia Borsacchi; Lucia Calucci; Maria Caporali; Stefano Caporali; Francesco d'Acapito; Marco Geppi; Andrea Giaccherini; Andrea Ienco; Gabriele Manca; Antonio Massimiliano Mio; Giuseppe Nicotra; Werner Oberhauser; Manuel Serrano-Ruiz; Martina Banchelli; Francesco Vizza; Maurizio Peruzzini Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2021-06-29 Impact factor: 16.383