Literature DB >> 29887578

Poor Rhythm Outcome of Catheter Ablation for Early-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Women - Mechanistic Insight.

Hee Tae Yu1, Pil-Sung Yang1, Tae-Hoon Kim1, Jae-Sun Uhm1, Jong-Youn Kim1, Boyoung Joung1, Moon-Hyoung Lee1, Hui-Nam Pak1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation is a good treatment option for atrial fibrillation (AF) in young symptomatic patients. However, there is little information on the efficacy of catheter ablation of early-onset AF between sexes. Methods and 
Results: This study included 1,060 patients under the age 60 years old (837 men, 49.8±7.7 years old, 70.8% paroxysmal AF) who underwent catheter ablation for AF. Sex differences in clinical presentation and ablation outcomes were compared with and without propensity score-matching. During 24.5±18.9 months of follow-up, women showed significantly higher clinical recurrence of AF than men (log-rank, P=0.002). Female sex was independently associated with post-ablation clinical recurrence of AF (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 2.58 [1.06-6.30], P=0.037). Women had a higher proportion of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (E/Em, P<0.001), higher prevalence of heart failure (P=0.017), greater left atrial (LA) volume index (P=0.001), lower LA endocardial voltage (P<0.001), and higher parasympathetic nervous activity (root-mean square of differences, P<0.001; high-frequency (HF), P=0.010) than men. After a second ablation procedure (n=111), women still showed a higher clinical recurrence rate than men (log-rank, P=0.003) during 22.9±15.0 months of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with early-onset AF who underwent catheter ablation, women showed poorer clinical outcomes than men after de novo and second procedures. Left ventricular dysfunction, LA remodeling, and autonomic nervous function may be potential mechanisms underlying sex differences in catheter ablation outcomes of early-onset AF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Recurrence; Sex differences

Year:  2018        PMID: 29887578     DOI: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-1358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  6 in total

Review 1.  Women and atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Annabelle Santos Volgman; Emelia J Benjamin; Anne B Curtis; Margaret C Fang; Kathryn J Lindley; Gerald V Naccarelli; Carl J Pepine; Odayme Quesada; Marmar Vaseghi; Albert L Waldo; Nanette K Wenger; Andrea M Russo
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 2.  Gender Differences in Atrial Fibrillation: A Review of Epidemiology, Management, and Outcomes.

Authors:  Stacy Westerman; Nanette Wenger
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2019

Review 3.  Catheter Ablation of Long-standing Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: a Reckless Challenge or a Way to Real Cure?

Authors:  Hui Nam Pak
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.243

4.  A novel and simple scoring system for assessing the indication for catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: The HEAL-AF Score.

Authors:  Takayuki Otsuka; Shinya Suzuki; Takuto Arita; Naoharu Yagi; Takanori Ikeda; Takeshi Yamashita
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2020-09-02

5.  Influence of Sex-Based Differences in Cardiac Phenotype on Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Authors:  Alena Yakimenka; Dina Labib; Steven Dykstra; Yoko Mikami; Alessandro Satriano; Jacqueline Flewitt; Patricia Feuchter; Sandra Rivest; Andrew G Howarth; Carmen P Lydell; F Russell Quinn; Stephen B Wilton; James A White
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-07-28

6.  Gender Difference in Catheter Ablation: Atrial Fibrillations from Mars and Venus?

Authors:  Hee Tae Yu; Hui Nam Pak
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.243

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.