Literature DB >> 29887485

First-line hysterectomy for women with low-risk non-metastatic gestational trophoblastic neoplasia no longer wishing to conceive.

Pierre-Adrien Bolze1, Mélodie Mathe2, Touria Hajri3, Benoit You4, Yohann Dabi5, Anne-Marie Schott3, Sophie Patrier6, Jérôme Massardier7, François Golfier8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low-risk gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) patients (FIGO score ≤6) are generally treated with single agent chemotherapy (methotrexate or dactinomycin) resulting in a 5-year mortality rate of 0.3%. However, despite these encouraging survival rates, chemotherapy is associated with significant adverse events in most patients. Although it is generally accepted that patients who no longer wish to conceive may be treated by hysterectomy for a hydatidiform mole, the evidence to support this strategy in low-risk GTN patients is lacking.
OBJECTIVES: To describe the survival, efficacy, and tolerance associated with first-line hysterectomy in low-risk non-metastatic GTN patients. STUDY
DESIGN: Seventy-four of 1072 low-risk GTN patients treated in the French Center underwent first-line hysterectomy. Patients data with successful first-line hysterectomy were retrospectively compared to those requiring further salvage chemotherapy.
RESULTS: First-line hysterectomy was followed by hCG normalization in 61 patients (82.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 71.8-90.3) without any further salvage chemotherapy, whereas 13 patients required salvage chemotherapy. After multivariate analysis, a FIGO score of 5-6 (exact OR 8.961, 95%CI 1.60-64.96), and the presence of choriocarcinoma (exact OR 14.295, 95%CI 1.78-138.13) were associated with the risk of requiring salvage chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: Hysterectomy as a first-line treatment is effective without salvage chemotherapy in 82.4% of women with low-risk non-metastatic GTN and can be presented as an alternative to single-agent chemotherapy when childbearing considerations have been fulfilled. In young patients, this therapeutic option should not be considered because single-agent chemotherapies are curative in nearly 100% of patients while maintaining fertility.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Choriocarcinoma; Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia; Hydatidiform mole; Hysterectomy; Trophoblast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29887485     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.05.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  3 in total

1.  Diagnosis and management of gestational trophoblastic disease: 2021 update.

Authors:  Hextan Y S Ngan; Michael J Seckl; Ross S Berkowitz; Yang Xiang; François Golfier; Paradan K Sekharan; John R Lurain; Leon Massuger
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 4.447

Review 2.  Treatment of gestational trophoblastic disease in the 2020s.

Authors:  James J Clark; Susanna Slater; Michael J Seckl
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 2.211

3.  Role of Hysterectomy in Gestational Trophoblastic Neoplasia.

Authors:  C K Ramesan; Dhanya Susan Thomas; Ajit Sebastian; Vinotha Thomas; Anitha Thomas; Rachel George; Abraham Peedicayil
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-04-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.