Anthony L Berger1, Angela M Henricks1, Janelle M Lugo2, Hayden R Wright2, Collin R Warrick2, Martin A Sticht3, Maria Morena3, Itziar Bonilla4, Sarah A Laredo5, Rebecca M Craft1, Loren H Parsons5, Pedro R Grandes6, Cecilia J Hillard7, Matthew N Hill3, Ryan J McLaughlin8. 1. Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington. 2. Department of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington. 3. Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 4. Department of Neurosciences, University of the Basque Country, Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Leioa, Spain; Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience, Science Park of the Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Leioa, Spain. 5. Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California. 6. Department of Neurosciences, University of the Basque Country, Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Leioa, Spain; Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience, Science Park of the Universidad del País Vasco/Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea, Leioa, Spain; Division of Medical Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. 7. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology and Neuroscience Research Center, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. 8. Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington; Department of Integrative Physiology and Neuroscience, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington. Electronic address: ryan.mclaughlin@wsu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The ability to effectively cope with stress is a critical determinant of disease susceptibility. The lateral habenula (LHb) and the endocannabinoid (ECB) system have independently been shown to be involved in the selection of stress coping strategies, yet the role of ECB signaling in the LHb remains unknown. METHODS: Using a battery of complementary techniques in rats, we examined the localization of type-1 cannabinoid receptors (CB1Rs) and assessed the behavioral and neuroendocrine effects of intra-LHb CB1R manipulations. We further tested the extent to which the ECB system in the LHb is impacted following chronic unpredictable stress or social defeat stress, and whether manipulation of LHb CB1Rs can bias coping strategies in rats with a history of chronic stress. RESULTS: Electron microscopy studies revealed CB1R expression on presynaptic axon terminals, postsynaptic membranes, mitochondria, and glial processes in the rat LHb. In vivo microdialysis experiments indicated that acute stress increased the amount of 2-arachidonoylglycerol in the LHb, while intra-LHb CB1R blockade increased basal corticosterone, augmented proactive coping strategies, and reduced anxiety-like behavior. Basal LHb 2-arachidonoylglycerol content was similarly elevated in rats that were subjected to chronic unpredictable stress or social defeat stress and positively correlated with adrenal weight. Finally, intra-LHb CB1R blockade increased proactive behaviors in response to a novel conspecific, increasing approach behaviors irrespective of stress history and decreasing the latency to be attacked during an agonistic encounter. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations in LHb ECB signaling may be relevant for development of stress-related pathologies in which LHb dysfunction and stress-coping impairments are hallmark symptoms. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: The ability to effectively cope with stress is a critical determinant of disease susceptibility. The lateral habenula (LHb) and the endocannabinoid (ECB) system have independently been shown to be involved in the selection of stress coping strategies, yet the role of ECB signaling in the LHb remains unknown. METHODS: Using a battery of complementary techniques in rats, we examined the localization of type-1 cannabinoid receptors (CB1Rs) and assessed the behavioral and neuroendocrine effects of intra-LHbCB1R manipulations. We further tested the extent to which the ECB system in the LHb is impacted following chronic unpredictable stress or social defeat stress, and whether manipulation of LHb CB1Rs can bias coping strategies in rats with a history of chronic stress. RESULTS: Electron microscopy studies revealed CB1R expression on presynaptic axon terminals, postsynaptic membranes, mitochondria, and glial processes in the ratLHb. In vivo microdialysis experiments indicated that acute stress increased the amount of 2-arachidonoylglycerol in the LHb, while intra-LHbCB1R blockade increased basal corticosterone, augmented proactive coping strategies, and reduced anxiety-like behavior. Basal LHb2-arachidonoylglycerol content was similarly elevated in rats that were subjected to chronic unpredictable stress or social defeat stress and positively correlated with adrenal weight. Finally, intra-LHbCB1R blockade increased proactive behaviors in response to a novel conspecific, increasing approach behaviors irrespective of stress history and decreasing the latency to be attacked during an agonistic encounter. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations in LHbECB signaling may be relevant for development of stress-related pathologies in which LHb dysfunction and stress-coping impairments are hallmark symptoms. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Kun Li; Tao Zhou; Lujian Liao; Zhongfei Yang; Catherine Wong; Fritz Henn; Roberto Malinow; John R Yates; Hailan Hu Journal: Science Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: M Navarro; E Hernández; R M Muñoz; I del Arco; M A Villanúa; M R Carrera; F Rodríguez de Fonseca Journal: Neuroreport Date: 1997-01-20 Impact factor: 1.837
Authors: Kay M Tye; Julie J Mirzabekov; Melissa R Warden; Emily A Ferenczi; Hsing-Chen Tsai; Joel Finkelstein; Sung-Yon Kim; Avishek Adhikari; Kimberly R Thompson; Aaron S Andalman; Lisa A Gunaydin; Ilana B Witten; Karl Deisseroth Journal: Nature Date: 2012-12-12 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Marjorie R Levinstein; David J Bergkamp; Zoë K Lewis; Alex Tsobanoudis; Koichi Hashikawa; Garret D Stuber; John F Neumaier Journal: Genes Brain Behav Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 3.708
Authors: Haley A Vecchiarelli; Maria Morena; Catherine M Keenan; Vincent Chiang; Kaitlyn Tan; Min Qiao; Kira Leitl; Alessia Santori; Quentin J Pittman; Keith A Sharkey; Matthew N Hill Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Adam Stasiulewicz; Katarzyna Znajdek; Monika Grudzień; Tomasz Pawiński; And Joanna I Sulkowska Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Sarah C Simmons; Ryan D Shepard; Shawn Gouty; Ludovic D Langlois; William J Flerlage; Brian M Cox; Fereshteh S Nugent Journal: Neurobiol Stress Date: 2020-11-17