Literature DB >> 29886760

Estimating risk of severe neonatal morbidity in preterm births under 32 weeks of gestation.

Emily F Hamilton1,2, Alina Dyachenko3, Antonio Ciampi3,4, Kimberly Maurel5, Philip A Warrick2, Thomas J Garite5,6.   

Abstract

Background: A large recent study analyzed the relationship between multiple factors and neonatal outcome and in preterm births. Study variables included the reason for admission, indication for delivery, optimal steroid use, gestational age, and other potential prognostic factors. Using stepwise multivariable analysis, the only two variables independently associated with serious neonatal morbidity were gestational age and the presence of suspected intrauterine growth restriction as a reason for admission. This finding was surprising given the beneficial effects of antenatal steroids and hazards associated with some causes of preterm birth. Multivariable logistic regression techniques have limitations. Without testing for multiple interactions, linear regression will identify only individual factors with the strongest independent relationship to the outcome for the entire study group. There may not be a single "best set" of risk factors or one set that applies equally well to all subgroups. In contrast, machine learning techniques find the most predictive groupings of factors based on their frequency and strength of association, with no attempt to identify independence and no assumptions about linear relationships.Objective: To determine if machine learning techniques would identify specific clusters of conditions with different probability estimates for severe neonatal morbidity and to compare these findings to those based on the original multivariable analysis.Materials and methods: This was a secondary analysis of data collected in a multicenter, prospective study on all admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit between 2013 and 2015 in 10 hospitals. We included all patients with a singleton, stillborn, or live newborns, with a gestational age between 23 0/7 and 31 6/7 week. The composite endpoint, severe neonatal morbidity, defined by the presence of any of five outcomes: death, grade 3 or 4 intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), and ≥28 days on ventilator, periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), or stage III necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), was present in 238 of the 1039 study patients. We studied five explanatory variables: maternal age, parity, gestational age, admission reason, and status with respect to antenatal steroid administration. We concentrated on Classification and Regression Trees because the resulting structure defines clusters of risk factors that often bear resemblance to clinical reasoning. Model performance was measured using area under the receiver-operator characteristic curves (AUC) based on 10 repetitions of 10-fold cross-validation.
Results: A hybrid technique using a combination of logistic regression and Classification and Regression Trees had a mean cross-validated AUC of 0.853. A selected point on its receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve corresponding to a sensitivity of 81% was associated with a specificity of 76%. Rather than a single curve representing the general relationship between gestational age and severe morbidity, this technique found seven clusters with distinct curves. Abnormal fetal testing as a reason for admission with or without growth restriction and incomplete steroid administration would place a 20-year-old patient on the highest risk curve.Conclusions: Using a relatively small database and a few simple factors known before birth it is possible to produce a more tailored estimate of the risk for severe neonatal morbidity on which clinicians can superimpose their medical judgment, experience, and intuition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; machine learning; neonatal death; prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29886760     DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1487395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1476-4954


  9 in total

1.  Three machine learning algorithms and their utility in exploring risk factors associated with primary cesarean section in low-risk women: A methods paper.

Authors:  Rebecca R S Clark; Jintong Hou
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.238

2.  Prediction of perinatal death using machine learning models: a birth registry-based cohort study in northern Tanzania.

Authors:  Innocent B Mboya; Michael J Mahande; Mohanad Mohammed; Joseph Obure; Henry G Mwambi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  A maChine and deep Learning Approach to predict pulmoNary hyperteNsIon in newbornS with congenital diaphragmatic Hernia (CLANNISH): Protocol for a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ilaria Amodeo; Giorgio De Nunzio; Genny Raffaeli; Irene Borzani; Alice Griggio; Luana Conte; Francesco Macchini; Valentina Condò; Nicola Persico; Isabella Fabietti; Stefano Ghirardello; Maria Pierro; Benedetta Tafuri; Giuseppe Como; Donato Cascio; Mariarosa Colnaghi; Fabio Mosca; Giacomo Cavallaro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Section (VBAC) Model using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarch Process.

Authors:  Stavroula Barbounaki; Kleanthi Gourounti; Antigoni Sarantaki
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2021-12

5.  Construction and validation of a preterm birth risk assessment model using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process.

Authors:  Stavroula Barbounaki; Antigoni Sarantaki
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.363

Review 6.  Using Machine Learning to Predict Complications in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ayleen Bertini; Rodrigo Salas; Steren Chabert; Luis Sobrevia; Fabián Pardo
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-19

Review 7.  Contributions of Artificial Intelligence Reported in Obstetrics and Gynecology Journals: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ferdinand Dhombres; Jules Bonnard; Kévin Bailly; Paul Maurice; Aris T Papageorghiou; Jean-Marie Jouannic
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 7.076

Review 8.  Omics approaches: interactions at the maternal-fetal interface and origins of child health and disease.

Authors:  Maide Ozen; Nima Aghaeepour; Ivana Marić; Ronald J Wong; David K Stevenson; Lauren L Jantzie
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2022-10-10       Impact factor: 3.953

Review 9.  Precision Medicine in Neonates: A Tailored Approach to Neonatal Brain Injury.

Authors:  Maria Luisa Tataranno; Daniel C Vijlbrief; Jeroen Dudink; Manon J N L Benders
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 3.418

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.