Literature DB >> 29886489

Quantification of Internal Filtration in Hollow Fiber Hemodialyzers with Medium Cut-Off Membrane.

Anna Lorenzin1, Mauro Neri1, Andrea Lupi2, Martina Todesco1, Monica Santimaria2, Alberta Alghisi3, Alessandra Brendolan4, Claudio Ronco1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inadequate removal of molecules between 5 and 50 KDa may cause long-term complication in chronic hemodialysis. Medium cut-off (MCO) is a new class of membranes with enhanced sieving properties and negligible albumin loss. MCO membrane makes it possible to perform expanded hemodialysis (HDx), a technique based on high internal filtration (IF).The present study is designed to quantify IF in 2 MCO dialyzers (Theranova 400 and 500, Baxter, Deerfield, USA) using a nuclear imaging technique previously validated.
METHODS: Blood and dialysate compartment pressure drop along with transmembrane pressure; they were measured in a closed in vitro circuit with human blood (blood flow [QB] = 300 and 400 mL/min; dialysate flow 500 mL/min; net ultrafiltration rate 0 mL/min). A non-diffusible marker molecule (albumin macro-aggregates labeled with 99Tc metastable) was injected in the blood compartment and nuclear emission was recorded by a gamma camera. Relative variations in the concentration of the marker molecule along the length of the filter were used to calculate local cross filtration.
RESULTS: Based on marker concentration profiles, IF was estimated. For Theranova 400, IF were 29.7 and 41.6 mL/min for QB of 300 and 400 mL/min. For Theranova 500, IF were 31.6 and 53.1 mL/min for QB of 300 and 400 mL/min respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: MCO membrane provides significant amounts of IF due to the particular combination between hydraulic permeability of the membrane and reduced inner diameter of the fibers. High IF combined with enhanced sieving profile of MCO membrane leads to improved removal of a wider spectrum of uremia retention molecules in HDx, without requiring complex equipment.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dialysis membrane; Expanded hemodialysis; Internal filtration; Medium cut-off; Nuclear imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29886489     DOI: 10.1159/000489993

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Purif        ISSN: 0253-5068            Impact factor:   2.614


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Hemodialysis Using a Medium Cutoff Dialyzer versus Hemodiafiltration: A Controlled Cross-Over Study.

Authors:  Anna Lindgren; Erik Fjellstedt; Anders Christensson
Journal:  Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis       Date:  2020-10-27

2.  Randomized controlled trial of medium cut-off versus high-flux dialyzers on quality of life outcomes in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Jeong-Hoon Lim; Yeongwoo Park; Ju-Min Yook; Soon-Youn Choi; Hee-Yeon Jung; Ji-Young Choi; Sun-Hee Park; Chan-Duck Kim; Yong-Lim Kim; Jang-Hee Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Dialyzer surface area is a significant predictor of mortality in patients on hemodialysis: a 3-year nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Masanori Abe; Ikuto Masakane; Atsushi Wada; Shigeru Nakai; Kosaku Nitta; Hidetomo Nakamoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Membrane innovation: closer to native kidneys.

Authors:  Markus Storr; Richard A Ward
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 5.992

Review 5.  Effects of Expanded Hemodialysis with Medium Cut-Off Membranes on Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Review.

Authors:  Zhuyun Zhang; Tinghang Yang; Yupei Li; Jiameng Li; Qinbo Yang; Liya Wang; Luojia Jiang; Baihai Su
Journal:  Membranes (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.