Literature DB >> 29886281

Is fistulotomy still the gold standard in present era and is it highly underutilized?: An audit of 675 operated cases.

Pankaj Garg1.   

Abstract

AIM: Due to fear of incontinence, fistulotomy perhaps remains highly underutilized. The aim was to analyze the efficacy of fistulotomy in a large cohort, to assess the magnitude of underutilization of fistulotomy by current classifications and to identify the subgroup in whom the fistulotomy should be done.
METHODS: All consecutive operated patients of fistula-in-ano were included in the study retrospectively. The fistulas were classified as per existing classifications-Parks, St James University Hospital (SJUH) and Garg classification. Smaller grades of each classification (Parks I, SJUH I-II, Garg I-II) were expected to be simple fistulas and thus amenable to fistulotomy. Objective incontinence scores were done preoperatively and postoperatively.
RESULTS: 675 patients were operated over a 5.5 year period (median-27 months). 25 patients were excluded. Fistulotomy was done in 353/650 (54.3%) patients and sphincter-saving procedures (SSP) performed in 297/650 (45.7%) patients. After fistulotomy, 346/353 (98%) fistulas healed after the first operation. Seven patients with recurrent fistula were cured after a repeat fistulotomy surgery. Thus the overall healing rate was 353/353 (100%). There was no significant change in continence scores. The 353 fistulotomy patients were classified as per different classifications- Parks (I-225,II-112,III-16,IV-0), SJUH(I-138,II-87,III-47,IV-65,V-16) and Garg (I-188,II-165,III-0,IV-0,V-0). 123 (36.3%) patients who could undergo fistulotomy successful were erroneously classified as complex fistula by Parks and SJUH classifications. Garg classification accurately identified all 353/353 (100%) patients were amenable to fistulotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Fistulotomy is a safe procedure with remarkably high success rate (100%) and is gold-standard in majority of patients (>50%). Parks and SJUH classifications are inaccurate in selecting patients for fistulotomy. Garg classification predicts amenability to fistulotomy with very high accuracy.
Copyright © 2018 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anal fistula; Fistula-in-ano; Fistulotomy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Operation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29886281     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  11 in total

1.  Fistulotomy and primary sphincteroplasty for anal fistula: long-term data on continence and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  F Litta; A Parello; V De Simone; U Grossi; R Orefice; C Ratto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-09-19       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Assessing validity of existing fistula-in-ano classifications in a cohort of 848 operated and MRI-assessed anal fistula patients - Cohort study.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2020-09-19

3.  Comparison of Preoperative and Postoperative MRI After Fistula-in-Ano Surgery: Lessons Learnt from An Audit of 1323 MRI At a Single Centre.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Implementation of laser ablation of fistula tract (LAFT) for perianal fistulas: do the results warrant continued application of this technique?

Authors:  J Stijns; Y T van Loon; S H E M Clermonts; K W Gӧttgens; D K Wasowicz; D D E Zimmerman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 5.  Heterogeneity in outcome selection, definition and measurement in studies assessing the treatment of cryptoglandular anal fistula: findings from a systematic review.

Authors:  A J H M Machielsen; N Iqbal; M L Kimman; K Sahnan; S O Adegbola; G Kane; R Woodcock; J Kleijnen; U Grossi; S O Breukink; P J Tozer
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 3.781

6.  Efficacy of video-assisted anal fistula treatment combined with closure of the internal opening using a stapler for Parks II anal fistula.

Authors:  Yuru Zhang; Fei Li; Tuanjie Zhao; Feng Cao; Yamin Zheng; Ang Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-11

7.  A Simple Protocol to Effectively Manage Anal Fistulas with No Obvious Internal Opening.

Authors:  Pankaj Garg; Baljit Kaur; Konica Singla; Geetha R Menon; Vipul D Yagnik
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-02-02

8.  Perianal fistulodesis - A pilot study of a novel minimally invasive surgical and medical approach for closure of perianal fistulae.

Authors:  Roxanne Villiger; Daniela Cabalzar-Wondberg; Daniela Zeller; Pascal Frei; Luc Biedermann; Christian Schneider; Michael Scharl; Gerhard Rogler; Matthias Turina; Andreas Rickenbacher; Benjamin Misselwitz
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-02-27

Review 9.  Current concepts in the pathogenesis of cryptoglandular perianal fistula.

Authors:  Marcin Włodarczyk; Jakub Włodarczyk; Aleksandra Sobolewska-Włodarczyk; Radzisław Trzciński; Łukasz Dziki; Jakub Fichna
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.671

10.  Treating highly complex anal fistula with a new method of combined intraoperative endoanal ultrasonography (IOEAUS) and transanal opening of intersphincteric space (TROPIS).

Authors:  Baolei Huang; Xu Wang; Dongxu Zhou; Si Chen; Bai Li; Yilin Wang; Jiandong Tai
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 1.195

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.