Literature DB >> 29886050

Molecular epidemiology of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile strains recovered from clinical trials in the US, Canada and Europe from 2006-2009 to 2012-2015.

Adam Cheknis1, Stuart Johnson2, Laurent Chesnel3, Laurica Petrella1, Susan Sambol4, Suzanne E Dale5, Julia Nary5, Pamela Sears3, Diane M Citron6, Ellie J C Goldstein6, Dale N Gerding4.   

Abstract

The prevalence of C. difficile infection (CDI) and severe CDI are influenced by the prevalence of specific C. difficile strains, which are themselves influenced by antimicrobial susceptibility determinants as well as antimicrobial usage patterns. Restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) typing and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were used to characterize 1808 C. difficile isolates obtained from patients enrolled in four multicenter, multi-country, randomized CDI treatment trials conducted between 2006 and 2009 and between 2012 and 2015. By 2015, the epidemic REA group BI strain (RT027) had decreased in prevalence in North America (US: 43%-18%, Canada: 39%-24%, P < 0.001), but rates of moxifloxacin resistance remained high. In contrast, REA group Y (RT014/020) and DH (RT106) strains, both of which had low rates of moxifloxacin resistance, increased in prevalence (Y strain - US: 6%-17%, Canada: 11%-23%, P < 0.001; DH strain - US: 1%-11%, Canada: 0%-8%, P < 0.0001). In Europe, the BI strain (RT027) was highly prevalent in Eastern European countries in 2015, but was unchanged in other parts of Europe. As in North America, the Y strain (RT014/020) was prevalent in both time periods, but the DH strain was rarely identified. Continued international molecular surveillance of C. difficile will be important to track prevalence of known epidemic strains and detect emergence of new strains of potential epidemiologic significance. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial resistance; Antimicrobial susceptibility; Clostridioides difficile; Clostridium difficile

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29886050     DOI: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaerobe        ISSN: 1075-9964            Impact factor:   3.331


  5 in total

1.  Clostridioides difficile ribotype 106: A systematic review of the antimicrobial susceptibility, genetics, and clinical outcomes of this common worldwide strain.

Authors:  T J Carlson; D Blasingame; A J Gonzales-Luna; F Alnezary; K W Garey
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.331

2.  Clostridium difficile beyond stools: dog nasal discharge as a possible new vector of bacterial transmission.

Authors:  C Rodriguez; B Taminiau; L Bouchafa; S Romijn; J Van Broeck; M Delmée; C Clercx; G Daube
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-05-13

3.  PCR ribotypes of Clostridioides difficile across Texas from 2011 to 2018 including emergence of ribotype 255.

Authors:  Anne J Gonzales-Luna; Travis J Carlson; Kierra M Dotson; Kelley Poblete; Gabriela Costa; Julie Miranda; Chris Lancaster; Seth T Walk; Shawn Tupy; Khurshida Begum; M Jahangir Alam; Kevin W Garey
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 7.163

4.  Analysis of C. difficile infection-related outcomes in European participants in the bezlotoxumab MODIFY I and II trials.

Authors:  Emilio Bouza; Oliver A Cornely; Antonio Ramos-Martinez; Robert Plesniak; Misoo C Ellison; Mary E Hanson; Mary Beth Dorr
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Phylogenomic analysis of Clostridioides difficile ribotype 106 strains reveals novel genetic islands and emergent phenotypes.

Authors:  Bryan Angelo P Roxas; Jennifer Lising Roxas; Rachel Claus-Walker; Anusha Harishankar; Asad Mansoor; Farhan Anwar; Shobitha Jillella; Alison Williams; Jason Lindsey; Sean P Elliott; Kareem W Shehab; V K Viswanathan; Gayatri Vedantam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.996

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.