Literature DB >> 29885380

Emerging category representation in the visual forebrain hierarchy of pigeons (Columba livia).

Amir Hossein Azizi1, Roland Pusch2, Charlotte Koenen2, Sebastian Klatt3, Franziska Bröker2, Samuel Thiele2, Janosch Kellermann4, Onur Güntürkün2, Sen Cheng3.   

Abstract

Recognizing and categorizing visual stimuli are cognitive functions vital for survival, and an important feature of visual systems in primates as well as in birds. Visual stimuli are processed along the ventral visual pathway. At every stage in the hierarchy, neurons respond selectively to more complex features, transforming the population representation of the stimuli. It is therefore easier to read-out category information in higher visual areas. While explicit category representations have been observed in the primate brain, less is known on equivalent processes in the avian brain. Even though their brain anatomies are radically different, it has been hypothesized that visual object representations are comparable across mammals and birds. In the present study, we investigated category representations in the pigeon visual forebrain using recordings from single cells responding to photographs of real-world objects. Using a linear classifier, we found that the population activity in the visual associative area mesopallium ventrolaterale (MVL) distinguishes between animate and inanimate objects, although this distinction is not required by the task. By contrast, a population of cells in the entopallium, a region that is lower in the hierarchy of visual areas and that is related to the primate extrastriate cortex, lacked this information. A model that pools responses of simple cells, which function as edge detectors, can account for the animate vs. inanimate categorization in the MVL, but performance in the model is based on different features than in MVL. Therefore, processing in MVL cells is very likely more abstract than simple computations on the output of edge detectors.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Categorization; Pigeon; Visual forebrain areas

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29885380     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2018.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  6 in total

Review 1.  Seeing the Forest for the Trees, and the Ground Below My Beak: Global and Local Processing in the Pigeon's Visual System.

Authors:  William Clark; Michael Colombo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-09

2.  "Prefrontal" Neuronal Foundations of Visual Asymmetries in Pigeons.

Authors:  Qian Xiao; Onur Güntürkün
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Neurons in the pigeon visual network discriminate between faces, scrambled faces, and sine grating images.

Authors:  William Clark; Matthew Chilcott; Amir Azizi; Roland Pusch; Kate Perry; Michael Colombo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The effect of progressive image scrambling on neuronal responses at three stations of the pigeon tectofugal pathway.

Authors:  William Clark; Matthew Chilcott; Michael Colombo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Digital embryos: a novel technical approach to investigate perceptual categorization in pigeons (Columba livia) using machine learning.

Authors:  Roland Pusch; Julian Packheiser; Charlotte Koenen; Fabrizio Iovine; Onur Güntürkün
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 2.899

6.  Pigeon nidopallium caudolaterale, entopallium, and mesopallium ventrolaterale neural responses during categorisation of Monet and Picasso paintings.

Authors:  Catrona Anderson; Renelyn S Parra; Hayley Chapman; Alina Steinemer; Blake Porter; Michael Colombo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.