Literature DB >> 29885260

The positive carbon stocks-biodiversity relationship in forests: co-occurrence and drivers across five subclimates.

Judit Lecina-Diaz1, Albert Alvarez1, Adrián Regos2,3,4, Pierre Drapeau5,6, Alain Paquette5,6, Christian Messier5,6,7, Javier Retana1,8.   

Abstract

Carbon storage in forests and its ability to offset global greenhouse gas emissions, as well as biodiversity and its capacity to support ecosystem functions and services, are often considered separately in landscape planning. However, the potential synergies between them are currently poorly understood. Identifying the spatial patterns and factors driving their co-occurrence across different climatic zones is critical to more effectively conserve forest ecosystems at the regional level. Here, we integrated information of National Forest Inventories and Breeding Bird Atlases across Europe and North America (Spain and Quebec, respectively), covering five subclimates (steppe, dry Mediterranean, humid Mediterranean, boreal, and temperate). In particular, this study aimed to (1) determine the spatial patterns of both forest carbon stocks and biodiversity (bird richness, tree richness, and overall biodiversity) and the factors that influence them; (2) establish the relationships between forest carbon stocks and biodiversity; and (3) define and characterize the areas of high (hotspots) and low (coldspots) values of carbon and biodiversity, and ultimately quantify their spatial overlap. Our results show that the factors affecting carbon and biodiversity vary between regions and subclimates. The highest values of carbon and biodiversity were found in northern Spain (humid Mediterranean subclimate) and southern Quebec (temperate subclimate) where there was more carbon as climate conditions were less limiting. High density and structural diversity simultaneously favored carbon stocks, tree, and overall biodiversity, especially in isolated and mountainous areas, often associated with steeper slopes and low accessibility. In addition, the relationship between carbon stocks and biodiversity was positive in both regions and all subclimates, being stronger where climate is a limiting factor for forest growth. The spatial overlap between hotspots of carbon and biodiversity provides an excellent opportunity for landscape planning to maintain carbon stocks and conserve biodiversity. The variables positively affecting carbon and biodiversity were also driving the hotspots of both carbon and biodiversity, emphasizing the viability of "win-win" solutions. Our results highlight the need to jointly determine the spatial patterns of ecosystem services and biodiversity for an effective and sustainable planning of forest landscapes that simultaneously support conservation and mitigate climate change.
© 2018 by the Ecological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mediterranean climate; biodiversity; bird richness; boreal subclimate; carbon storage; conservation priorities; hotspots and coldspots distribution; landscape planning; steppe subclimate; synergies and trade-offs; temperate subclimate; tree richness

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29885260     DOI: 10.1002/eap.1749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  4 in total

1.  Mapping co-benefits for carbon storage and biodiversity to inform conservation policy and action.

Authors:  C Soto-Navarro; C Ravilious; A Arnell; X de Lamo; M Harfoot; S L L Hill; O R Wearn; M Santoro; A Bouvet; S Mermoz; T Le Toan; J Xia; S Liu; W Yuan; S A Spawn; H K Gibbs; S Ferrier; T Harwood; R Alkemade; A M Schipper; G Schmidt-Traub; B Strassburg; L Miles; N D Burgess; V Kapos
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Carbon sequestration and biodiversity co-benefits of preserving forests in the western United States.

Authors:  Polly C Buotte; Beverly E Law; William J Ripple; Logan T Berner
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.657

3.  Water availability drives aboveground biomass and bird richness in forest restoration plantings to achieve carbon and biodiversity cobenefits.

Authors:  Valerie Hagger; Kerrie Wilson; Jacqueline R England; John M Dwyer
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Natural disturbance impacts on trade-offs and co-benefits of forest biodiversity and carbon.

Authors:  Martin Mikoláš; Marek Svitok; Radek Bače; Garrett W Meigs; William S Keeton; Heather Keith; Arne Buechling; Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Daniel Kozák; Kurt Bollmann; Krešimir Begovič; Vojtěch Čada; Oleh Chaskovskyy; Dheeraj Ralhan; Martin Dušátko; Matej Ferenčík; Michal Frankovič; Rhiannon Gloor; Jeňýk Hofmeister; Pavel Janda; Ondrej Kameniar; Jana Lábusová; Linda Majdanová; Thomas A Nagel; Jakob Pavlin; Joseph L Pettit; Ruffy Rodrigo; Catalin-Constantin Roibu; Miloš Rydval; Francesco M Sabatini; Jonathan Schurman; Michal Synek; Ondřej Vostarek; Veronika Zemlerová; Miroslav Svoboda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.