Literature DB >> 29884228

Elevated levels of plasma symmetric dimethylarginine and increased arginase activity as potential indicators of cardiovascular comorbidity in rheumatoid arthritis.

Unnikrishnan M Chandrasekharan1, Zeneng Wang1, Yuping Wu2, W H Wilson Tang1,3, Stanley L Hazen1,3, Sihe Wang4, M Elaine Husni5,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients are at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). In RA, chronic inflammation may lead to endothelial dysfunction, an early indicator of CVD, owing to diminished nitric oxide (NO) production. Because L-arginine is the sole precursor of NO, we hypothesized that levels of L-arginine metabolic products reflecting NO metabolism are altered in patients with RA.
METHODS: Plasma samples from patients with RA (n = 119) and age- and sex-matched control subjects (n = 238) were used for this study. Using LC-MS/MS, we measured plasma levels of free L-arginine, L-ornithine, L-citrulline, L-NG-monomethyl arginine (MMA), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA). We compared global arginine bioavailability ratio (GABR) (i.e., ratio of L-arginine to L-ornithine + L-citrulline) and arginine methylation index (ArgMI) (i.e., ADMA + SDMA/MMA) in patients with RA vs. control subjects. Plasma arginase activity was measured using a sensitive arginase assay kit. The relationship of L-arginine metabolites and arginase activity to CVD risk factors was evaluated using Pearson's chi-square test.
RESULTS: Compared with healthy control subjects, the RA cohort showed significantly lower levels of plasma L-arginine (46.11 ± 17.29 vs. 74.2 ± 22.53 μmol/L, p < 0.001) and GABR (0.36 ± 0.16 vs. 0.73 ± 0.24, p < 0.001), elevated levels of ADMA (0.76 ± 0.12 vs. 0.62 ± 0.12 μmol/L, p < 0.001), SDMA (0.54 ± 0.14 vs. 0.47 ± 0.13 μmol/L, p < 0.001), and ArgMI (6.51 ± 1.86 vs. 5.54 ± 1.51, p < 0.001). We found an approximately fourfold increase in arginase activity (33.8 ± 1.1 vs. 8.4 ± 0.8 U/L, p < 0.001), as well as elevated levels of arginase-mediated L-arginine catalytic product L-ornithine (108.64 ± 30.26 vs. 69.3 ± 20.71 μmol/L, p < 0.001), whereas a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) catalytic product, the L-citrulline level, was diminished in RA (30.32 ± 9.93 vs. 36.17 ± 11.64 μmol/L, p < 0.001). Patients with RA with existing CVD had higher arginase activity than patients with RA without CVD (p = 0.048).
CONCLUSIONS: Global L-arginine bioavailability was diminished, whereas plasma arginase activity, ADMA, and SDMA levels were elevated, in patients with RA compared with healthy control subjects. Plasma SDMA was associated with hypertension and hyperlipidemia in patients with RA. This dysregulated L-arginine metabolism may function as a potential indicator of CVD risk in patients with RA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arginase; Dimethylarginines; L-arginine; Nitric oxide; Rheumatoid arthritis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29884228      PMCID: PMC5994036          DOI: 10.1186/s13075-018-1616-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther        ISSN: 1478-6354            Impact factor:   5.156


Background

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) affects approximately 0.5–1% of the U.S. general adult population [1-3]. Patients with RA have both articular and extraarticular manifestations, such as accelerated cardiovascular disease (CVD), which accounts for up to 50% of the deaths in this population [4, 5]. The cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are hypothesized to be due in part to persistent systemic inflammation; however, the exact mechanisms remain undetermined. Unfortunately, traditional cardiac risk factors seen in the normal population do not completely account for this increase in CVD in RA, a prototypical rheumatic disease [6, 7]. There is a great unmet need to identify nontraditional molecular biomarkers and related pathways responsible for the higher CVD incidence in patients with RA. l-arginine is the common substrate of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) and arginases [8]. NOS catalyzes l-arginine to generate nitric oxide (NO) and l-citrulline, whereas arginases catalyze the conversion of l-arginine to l-ornithine and urea (Fig. 1a). Elevated arginase activity therefore can diminish the bioavailability of l-arginine by substrate competition and decrease NO production, which can lead to endothelial dysfunction [9, 10] and eventually result in adverse cardiovascular issues [11]. An additional level of regulation in NO production is mediated by methylated arginine products l-NG-monomethyl arginine (MMA), asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), and symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) (Fig. 1b). MMA and ADMA are potent endogenous inhibitors of NOS, whereas SDMA inhibits NO production mainly by blocking the cellular uptake of l-arginine [12]. The role of elevated ADMA in inducing endothelial dysfunction has been studied extensively [13-15]; however, the role of SDMA in CVD pathogenesis is not well understood. Importantly, our group and others have demonstrated that elevated plasma levels of both ADMA and SDMA are associated with increased risk for CVD in the general population [14, 16–19].
Fig. 1

Urea cycle and dimethylarginine metabolic pathways. a l-Arginine is the common substrate of arginase and nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and l-NG-monomethyl arginine (MMA) are potent inhibitors of NOS, whereas symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) inhibits nitric oxide (NO) production by inhibiting l-arginine cellular uptake. b Schematic diagram showing the pathways that produce methylated arginines (MMA, ADMA, and SDMA). PRMT Protein arginine methyltransferase

Urea cycle and dimethylarginine metabolic pathways. a l-Arginine is the common substrate of arginase and nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and l-NG-monomethyl arginine (MMA) are potent inhibitors of NOS, whereas symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) inhibits nitric oxide (NO) production by inhibiting l-arginine cellular uptake. b Schematic diagram showing the pathways that produce methylated arginines (MMA, ADMA, and SDMA). PRMT Protein arginine methyltransferase Despite emerging data showing a relationship between specific l-arginine metabolites and CVD in respective RA cohorts, a comprehensive study evaluating the arginine metabolome in a single RA cohort has not been performed. In the present study, we studied a panel of plasma l-arginine metabolites representing NO metabolism and plasma arginase activity in patients with RA compared with age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects. In addition, we examined associations of CVD risk factors in RA with (a) l-arginine metabolites; (b) global arginine bioavailability ratio (GABR; the ratio of l-arginine to l-ornithine + l-citrulline), which reflects overall status of l-arginine catabolism [20]; and (c) arginine methylation index (ArgMI). ArgMI is an overall gauge for posttranslational methylation of arginine (i.e., ADMA + SDMA/MMA), which we found to be potentially a better predictor of CVD than free methylated arginines [17, 20].

Methods

Patient cohort

In our cross-sectional study, patients with RA diagnosed by a board-certified rheumatologist were sequentially selected from the Cleveland Clinic Department of Rheumatic and Immunologic Diseases outpatient rheumatology clinics. Plasma samples were obtained under a protocol approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of the Cleveland Clinic, and all participants gave written informed consent. Associated clinical data and standard of care laboratory values were collected from the patient’s medical records into a de-identified, IRB-approved biospecimen registry. Clinical information collected on the RA disease cohort included body mass index; RA disease duration; RA disease activity (Disease Activity Score in 28 joints [DAS28]); seropositivity status; disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment; and CV risk factors, including history of diabetes mellitus, systolic hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and prior history of CVD (defined as myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, or valvular disease and replacement). Laboratory data included C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) values. Patients were determined to be seropositive on the basis of a rheumatoid factor > 20 IU/ml or cyclic citrullinated peptide autoantibody level > 20 U.

Measurement of l-arginine and l-arginine derivatives

Plasma samples from 119 nonfasting patients with RA and 238 nonfasting control subjects were obtained under a protocol approved by the Cleveland Clinic IRB. Plasma aliquots were isolated from whole blood collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid-containing tubes that maintained at 0 °C to 4 °C immediately after phlebotomy, processed within 4 hours of blood draw, and stored at − 80 °C until use. Plasma concentrations of l-arginine, its metabolites (l-ornithine and l-citrulline), and methylated arginine byproducts (MMA, ADMA, and SDMA) were quantified as described in an earlier publication [17]. Briefly, 4 vol of methanol-containing, isotope-labeled internal standards were added to 1 vol of plasma to precipitate protein. The supernatant after centrifugation was analyzed by injection onto a silica column interfaced with an API 4000 Q-TRAP mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA). A discontinuous gradient was generated to resolve the analytes by mixing solvent A (0.1% propionic acid in water) with solvent B (0.1% acetic acid in methanol) [21]. Analytes and the isotope-labeled internal standards were monitored by positive multiple reaction mode MS using characteristic precursor–product ion transitions. The parameters for the ion monitoring were optimized for each analyte. Various concentrations of analytes were titrated with control plasma sample to prepare the calibration curves.

Plasma arginase activity

We measured plasma arginase activity in 119 patients with RA and compared it with that of 148 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Plasma arginase activity was measured using the QuantiChrom Arginase Assay Kit (BioAssay Systems, Hayward, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 5 μl of the plasma was diluted to 40 μl with deionized water (1:8 sample dilution), or 40 μl of deionized water (blank) was treated with kit-provided substrate containing reaction mixture, and then incubated at 37 °C for 2 hours. Arginase-catalyzed urea was measured by colorimetry after adding kit-provided reagents. The optical density was measured at 430 nm. Urea (1 mM) was used as the standard. Arginase activity (expressed as U/L of sample) was calculated. One unit of arginase converts 1 μmol of l-arginine to ornithine and urea per minute at pH 9.5 and 37 °C.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive summaries of demographic and clinical variables for patients with RA are provided. These include sex, medical history, medications, RA disease activity measures, CVD risk assessments, and laboratory parameters such as traditional systemic inflammatory markers. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, and continuous variables were compared using the t test, analysis of variance, or their nonparametric analogues, as appropriate based on distributional assumptions. Plasma levels of l-arginine and its derivatives are reported for subjects with RA and age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects by means and SDs or by medians within IQRs, as appropriate (primarily based on normalized vs. skewed distribution of the data, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression models are used to estimate the ORs associated with various l-arginine metabolites among RA and control subjects. Correlations between l-arginine, its derivatives’ levels, and a broad range of arthritic, inflammatory, and CV parameters were assessed using Spearman’s correlation. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using R version 3.1.0 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Study population

Our cohort consisted of 119 patients with RA (84% female, mean age 60.6 ± 13.4 yr) and 238 control subjects (82% female, mean age 59 ± 13.9 yr). A subgroup of patients with RA (n = 33, 27.7%) from this cohort had a DAS28 assessment at the time of sampling with a median DAS28 score of 2.7 ± 1.2, 2.6 (1.6–3.5). Mean disease duration was 11.7 ± 9.6 years with low median CRP (mg/dl) of 1.2 ± 2.6, 0.4(0.2–0.9) and ESR (mm/h) of 21.3 ± 18.3, 14.5 (7–29.2) (Table 1). This patient population also had a significant history of CVD risk factors, including diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension at 18%, 47%, and 60%, respectively. Patients with a prior history of CVD represented 14% of the population.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 119)

DemographicsValues
Demographics
 Male sex19 (16%)
 Age, years60.6 ± 13.4, 62.0 (53.5–70.5)
 BMI, kg/m228.8 ± 6.3, 28.0 (25–32)
Disease activity
 Seropositive RA**85 (71.4%)
  RF+ (≥ 20)75 (63.0%)
  CCP+ (≥ 20)59 (49.6%)
 Disease duration, yr11.7 ± 9.6, 9.0 (5–16)
 DAS282.7 ± 1.2, 2.6 (1.6–3.5)
CV burden assessments
 Diabetes mellitus21 (17.6%)
 Hypertension71 (59.7%)
 Dyslipidemia56 (47.1%)
 Prior CV disease history17 (14.3%)
 Smoking (current)57 (47.9%)
Medications
 Statin use32 (26.9%)
 Steroid use54 (45.4%)
 Methotrexate use64 (53.8%)
 Biologic DMARD usea61 (51.3%)
 Not currently receiving DMARDs11 (9.2%)
 Antihypertensive drugsb55 (77.5%)
  Diuretic29 (40.8%)
  Calcium channel blocker21 (29.6%)
  ACE inhibitor19 (26.8%)
  β-Blocker18 (25.4%)
  Angiotensin II receptor blockers13 (18.3%)
  Vasodilator1 (1.4%)
  α2-Adrenergic agonist1 (1.4%)
Laboratory examination results
 ESR, mm/h21.3 ± 18.3, 14.5 (7–29.2)
  > 15 mm/h45 (37.8%)
  ≤ 15 mm/h47 (39.5%)
  N/A27 (22.7%)
 CRP (mg/dl)1.2 ± 2.6, 0.4 (0.2–0.9)
  > 1 mg/dl22 (18.5%)
  ≤ 1 mg/dl76 (63.9%)
  N/A21 (17.6%)

Abbreviations: BMI Body mass index, RA Rheumatoid arthritis, RF Rheumatoid factor, CCP Cyclic citrullinated peptide, DAS28 Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, CV Cardiovascular, DMARD Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, ACE Angiotensin-converting enzyme, ESR Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP C-reactive protein, N/A Not available

Values are given as number (%), mean ± SD, or median (IQR)

a Current use at the time of sampling

b Some patients overlap in multiple subcategories

Clinical characteristics of subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 119) Abbreviations: BMI Body mass index, RA Rheumatoid arthritis, RF Rheumatoid factor, CCP Cyclic citrullinated peptide, DAS28 Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, CV Cardiovascular, DMARD Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, ACE Angiotensin-converting enzyme, ESR Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP C-reactive protein, N/A Not available Values are given as number (%), mean ± SD, or median (IQR) a Current use at the time of sampling b Some patients overlap in multiple subcategories

Aberrant l-arginine metabolism in subjects with RA

We compared the l-arginine, l-arginine catabolic products, and methylated arginine derivatives in patients with RA and age- and sex-matched control subjects (Fig. 2). Compared with control subjects, the RA cohort had significantly lower levels of l-arginine (43.2 vs. 71.7 μmol/L, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2a) and GABR (0.34 vs. 0.70, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2d). The RA cohort also showed a concomitant increase in the arginase catabolic product l-ornithine (106.3 vs. 67.6 μmol/L, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2b) and diminished levels of the NOS catabolic product l-citrulline (29.6 vs. 35.6 μmol/L, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2c). In the RA cohort, we also found elevated levels of ADMA (0.76 vs. 0.61 μmol/L, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2e), SDMA (0.52 vs. 0.46 μmol/L, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2f), and the index of arginine methylation, ArgMI [(ADMA+SDMA)/MMA] (6.2 vs. 5.30, p < 0.001) (Fig. 2h). Compared with control subjects, plasma level of MMA did not change significantly in patients with RA (0.21 μmol/L in control and RA) (Fig. 2g).
Fig. 2

Quantification of l-arginine and l-arginine metabolites in human plasma. Plasma levels of l-arginine and l-arginine catabolic products and methylated arginine derivatives in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 119) vs. control subjects (n = 238) were measured using LC-MS/MS: l-arginine (a), l-ornithine (b), l-citrulline (c), GABR (d), ADMA (e), SDMA (f), MMA (g), and ArgMI (h). GABR Global arginine bioavailability ratio (i.e., ratio of l-arginine to l-ornithine + l-citrulline), ADMA Asymmetric dimethylarginine, SDMA Symmetric dimethylarginine, ArgMI Arginine methylation index (i.e., ADMA + SDMA/MMA), MMA l-NG-monomethyl arginine, RA Rheumatoid arthritis. *** p < 0.001

Quantification of l-arginine and l-arginine metabolites in human plasma. Plasma levels of l-arginine and l-arginine catabolic products and methylated arginine derivatives in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 119) vs. control subjects (n = 238) were measured using LC-MS/MS: l-arginine (a), l-ornithine (b), l-citrulline (c), GABR (d), ADMA (e), SDMA (f), MMA (g), and ArgMI (h). GABR Global arginine bioavailability ratio (i.e., ratio of l-arginine to l-ornithine + l-citrulline), ADMA Asymmetric dimethylarginine, SDMA Symmetric dimethylarginine, ArgMI Arginine methylation index (i.e., ADMA + SDMA/MMA), MMA l-NG-monomethyl arginine, RA Rheumatoid arthritis. *** p < 0.001 Next, we performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to estimate the ORs associated with plasma l-arginine metabolites among the patients with RA. After adjustment for decreased renal function, which influences steady-state level of plasma SDMA in particular [22], we found that ADMA, SDMA, and ArgMI each had a positive relationship with RA with ORs >1 (Table 2): ADMA (3.82 [95% CI, 2.67–5.46], p < 0.001), SDMA (1.43 [95% CI, 1.07–1.93], p = 0.0163), and ArgMI (2.0 [95% CI, 1.50–2.65], p < 0.001). GABR (OR, 0.03 [95% CI, 0.01–0.07], p < 0.001) and l-arginine (OR, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.07–0.21], p < 0.001) each showed a negative relationship with RA. In the general population; both GABR and ArgMI have been shown to be better predictors of major adverse cardiac events than free l-arginine or individual methylated arginine derivatives [20, 23].
Table 2

Elevated l-arginine metabolites in plasma are associated with rheumatoid arthritis incidence

OR (95% CI)p Value
ADMA
 Unadjusted OR3.79 (2.73–5.26)< 0.001
 Adjusted OR3.82 (2.67–5.46)< 0.001
SDMA
 Unadjusted OR1.68 (1.31–2.16)< 0.001
 Adjusted OR1.43 (1.07–1.93)0.0163
ArgMI
 Unadjusted OR2.03 (1.55–2.65)< 0.001
 Adjusted OR2 (1.5–2.65)< 0.001
GABR
 Unadjusted OR0.04 (0.02–0.08)< 0.001
 Adjusted OR0.03 (0.01–0.07)< 0.001
l-arginine
 Unadjusted OR0.14 (0.09–0.22)< 0.001
 Adjusted OR0.12 (0.07–0.21)< 0.001
l-ornithine
 Unadjusted OR7.36 (4.76–11.39)< 0.001
 Adjusted OR7.56 (4.68–12.22)< 0.001
l-citrulline
 Unadjusted OR0.55 (0.42–0.71)< 0.001
 Adjusted OR0.38 (0.27–0.53)< 0.001

Abbreviations: ADMA Asymmetric dimethylarginine, SDMA Symmetric dimethylarginine, ArgMI Arginine methylation index (i.e., ADMA + SDMA/l-NG-monomethyl arginine), GABR Global arginine bioavailability ratio (i.e., ratio of l-arginine to l-ornithine + l-citrulline)

Adjusted for age, sex, and decreased renal function (creatinine > 1.4 mg/dl or GFR ≤ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. ORs are presented per SD

Elevated l-arginine metabolites in plasma are associated with rheumatoid arthritis incidence Abbreviations: ADMA Asymmetric dimethylarginine, SDMA Symmetric dimethylarginine, ArgMI Arginine methylation index (i.e., ADMA + SDMA/l-NG-monomethyl arginine), GABR Global arginine bioavailability ratio (i.e., ratio of l-arginine to l-ornithine + l-citrulline) Adjusted for age, sex, and decreased renal function (creatinine > 1.4 mg/dl or GFR ≤ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. ORs are presented per SD

SDMA is associated with hypertension and hyperlipidemia in subjects with RA

We further determined whether the levels of ADMA, SDMA, ArgMI, and GABR were associated with CVD risk factors in patients with RA (Table 3). Among various CVD risk factors, patients with RA with a prior history of hypertension (n = 71) showed statistically significant elevated levels of SDMA (μmol/L plasma) compared with patients with RA with normal blood pressure (n = 48): (0.6 ± 0.2, 0.5 [0.5–0.6]; vs. 0.5 ± 0.1, 0.5 [0.4–0.5]; p = 0.006). We also found a negative association of SDMA and ArgMI with seropositivity. Plasma SDMA level in seropositive patients with RA (n = 85) compared with seronegative patients (n = 34) were as follows: 0.5 ± 0.1, 0.5 (0.4–0.6) vs. 0.6 ± 0.2, 0.5 (0.5–0.6) (p = 0.035). Similarly, we found a lower ArgMI in seropositive patients compared with seronegative patients: 6.2 ± 1.4, 6.0 (5.3–6.9) vs. 7.6 ± 2.9, 7.3 (6.0–8.8) (p = 0.03).
Table 3

Comparison of plasma levels of l-arginine metabolites in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with and without cardiovascular risk factors

CV risk factorsADMA (μmol/L)SDMA (μmol/L)ArgMIGABR
No. of patientsValuep ValueValuep ValueValuep ValueValuep Value
History of diabetes (+)980.8 ± 0.10.8 (0.7–0.8)0.4840.5 ± 0.10.5 (0.4–0.6)0.6526.6 ± 1.96.3 (5.4–7.3)0.0310.4 ± 0.20.3 (0.2–0.4)0.556
History of diabetes (−)210.8 ± 0.10.8 (0.7–0.9)0.5 ± 0.10.5 (0.4–0.6)5.9 ± 1.36.1 (5–6.4)0.4 ± 0.2,0.4 (0.3–0.5)
History of hyperlipidemia (−)630.8 ± 0.10.8 (0.7–0.8)0.2600.5 ± 0.10.5 (0.4–0.6)0.0546.5 ± 2.26.1 (5.3–7.1)0.8500.4 ± 0.20.4 (0.3–0.5)0.259
History of hyperlipidemia (+)560.7 ± 0.10.8 (0.7–0.8)0.6 ± 0.20.5 (0.4–0.6)6.5 ± 1.46.5 (5.7–7)0.3 ± 0.20.3 (0.2–0.4)
History of HTN (−)480.8 ± 0.10.7 (0.7–0.8)0.6620.5 ± 0.10.5 (0.4–0.5)0.006*6.3 ± 1.76 (5.3–7.4)0.3460.4 ± 0.10.3 (0.2–0.4)0.875
History of HTN (+)710.8 ± 0.10.8 (0.7–0.8)0.6 ± 0.20.5 (0.5–0.6)6.6 ± 26.4 (5.7–7)0.4 ± 0.20.3 (0.3–0.4)
Two or more CVD risk factors460.8 ± 0.10.8 (0.7–0.8)0.6400.6 ± 0.20.5 (0.5–0.6)0.1086.5 ± 1.46.4 (5.8–6.9)0.9860.4 ± 0.20.3 (0.3–0.4)0.827
Less than two CVD risk factors730.8 ± 0.10.8 (0.7–0.8)0.5 ± 0.10.5 (0.4–0.6)6.5 ± 2.16.1 (5.3–7.3)0.4 ± 0.20.3 (0.2–0.5)
Smoking (−)620.8 ± 0.10.7 (0.7–0.8)0.3130.5 ± 0.10.5 (0.4–0.6)0.7546.5 ± 1.66.2 (5.5–7)0.9120.4 ± 0.20.3 (0.2–0.4)0.968
Smoking (+)570.8 ± 0.10.8 (0.7–0.8)0.5 ± 0.20.5 (0.4–0.6)6.5 ± 2.26.1 (5.1–7.2)0.4 ± 0.20.3 (0.2–0.4)
History of CVD (−)1010.8 ± 0.10.8 (0.7–0.8)0.5420.5 ± 0.10.5 (0.4–0.6)0.3796.6 ± 1.96.2 (5.4–7.3)0.2700.4 ± 0.20.3 (0.2–0.4)0.473
History of CVD (+)170.8 ± 0.10.8 (0.7–0.8)0.5 ± 0.10.5(0.4–0.6)6.2 ± 1.26.4 (5–6.7)0.4 ± 0.20.4 (0.2–0.6)
Seropositive (+)850.8 ± 0.10.8 (0.7–0.8)0.2930.5 ± 0.10.5 (0.4–0.6)0.0356.2 ± 1.46 (5.3–6.9)0.030.4 ± 0.20.3 (0.3–0.4)0.434
Seronegative (−)340.7 ± 0.10.7 (0.7–0.8)0.6 ± 0.20.5 (0.5–0.6)7.6 ± 2.97.3 (6–8.8)0.4 ± 0.20.4 (0.3–0.5)

Abbreviations: ADMA Asymmetric dimethylarginine, SDMA Symmetric dimethylarginine, ArgMI Arginine methylation index (i.e., ADMA + SDMA/l-NG-monomethyl arginine), GABR Global arginine bioavailability ratio (i.e., ratio of l-arginine to l-ornithine + l-citrulline), CV Cardiovascular, CVD Cardiovascular disease, HTN Hypertension

Comparison of plasma levels of l-arginine metabolites in patients with rheumatoid arthritis with and without cardiovascular risk factors Abbreviations: ADMA Asymmetric dimethylarginine, SDMA Symmetric dimethylarginine, ArgMI Arginine methylation index (i.e., ADMA + SDMA/l-NG-monomethyl arginine), GABR Global arginine bioavailability ratio (i.e., ratio of l-arginine to l-ornithine + l-citrulline), CV Cardiovascular, CVD Cardiovascular disease, HTN Hypertension Further, as shown in Table 4, patients in the highest SDMA quartile (≥ 0.58 μmol/L) had a higher prevalence of the following cardiovascular risk factors than those in the lowest quartile (< 0.44 μmol/L): hypertension (78.8% vs. 44.8%, p = 0.039), hyperlipidemia (63.6% vs. 31%, p = 0.014) and two or more CV risk factors (54.5% vs. 27.6%, p = 0.022). Disease duration, DAS28 scores, and inflammatory markers CRP and ESR were not associated with ADMA, SDMA, ArgMI, or GABR levels (data not shown).
Table 4

Prevalence of hypertension and hyperlipidemia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in highest symmetric dimethylarginine quartile

SDMA Quartiles
Quartile 1Quartile 2Quartile 3Quartile 4p Value
No. of patients29292833
SDMA, μM/L< 0.440.45–0.510.52–0.57≥ 0.58
Demographics
 Age, yr52.8 ± 12.459.7 ± 15.462.5 ± 10.966.7 ± 11.2< 0.001a
 BMI, kg/m229.24 ± 6.8327.55 ± 4.7928.55 ± 8.229.67 ± 5.380.592
Disease activity
 Disease duration, yr11.19 ± 9.9113 ± 10.1410.48 ± 7.0511.96 ± 11.020.805
 DAS283.47 (2.51–3.9)2.06 (1.38–2.87)2.42 (1.71–2.91)2.76 (1.82–3.63)0.117
CV burden and assessments, n (%)
 History of diabetes,5 (17.24%)7 (24.14%)3 (10.71%)6 (18.18%)0.621
  History of hyperlipidemia9 (31%)17 (58.6%)9 (32.1%)21 (63.6%)0.014a
  History of hypertension13 (44.8%)17 (58.6%)15 (53.6%)26 (78.8%)0.039a
 Two or more CV risk factors8 (27.6%)14 (48.3%)6 (21.4%)18 (54.5%)0.022a
 History of CVD4 (13.8%)2 (6.9%)5 (17.9%)6 (18.2%)0.585
 Smoking14 (48.3%)12 (41.4%)11 (39.3%)20 (60.6%)0.330
Laboratory examination results
 ESR, mm/h14.5 (8.25–28.75)11 (7–30)10 (7–24)21 (9–28.75)0.944
 CRP, mg/dl0.6 (0.2–1.7)0.3 (0.2–0.6)0.4 (0.1–1)0.6 (0.2–1.6)0.678

Abbreviations: SDMA Symmetric dimethylarginine, BMI Body mass index, DAS28 Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, CV Cardiovascular, CVD Cardiovascular disease, ESR Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP C-reactive protein

a statistically significant

Prevalence of hypertension and hyperlipidemia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in highest symmetric dimethylarginine quartile Abbreviations: SDMA Symmetric dimethylarginine, BMI Body mass index, DAS28 Disease Activity Score in 28 joints, CV Cardiovascular, CVD Cardiovascular disease, ESR Erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP C-reactive protein a statistically significant

Arginase activity is elevated in RA

We measured plasma arginase activity in 119 patients with RA (Table 1) and compared it with that of 148 age- and sex-matched control subjects. These control subjects had no RA disease activity; however, other clinical parameters of the control subjects were not evaluated. The plasma arginase activity was significantly elevated in the RA cohort (> 400%) compared with control group (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 3a).
Fig. 3

a Plasma arginase activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) vs. non-RA control subjects. Plasma arginase activity was measured using QuantiChrom Arginase Assay Kit. One unit of arginase converts 1 μmol of l-arginine to ornithine and urea per minute at pH 9.5 and 37 °C. b Elevated arginase activity is associated with RA with prior history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). p = 0.048

a Plasma arginase activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) vs. non-RA control subjects. Plasma arginase activity was measured using QuantiChrom Arginase Assay Kit. One unit of arginase converts 1 μmol of l-arginine to ornithine and urea per minute at pH 9.5 and 37 °C. b Elevated arginase activity is associated with RA with prior history of cardiovascular disease (CVD). p = 0.048 Further analysis showed heightened arginase activity in a subgroup of 17 patients with RA with existing CVD compared with patients with RA without CVD (n = 101) (p = 0.048) (Fig. 3b). Interestingly, elevated arginase activity did not show an association with traditional risk factors such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and smoking.

Discussion

Using a comprehensive metabolomic analysis, we tested whether plasma l-arginine metabolites representing l-arginine bioavailability and l-arginine metabolites reflecting NO metabolism were altered in an RA cohort. Compared with healthy control subjects, our RA cohort showed robust increases in the arginase catabolic product l-ornithine (~ 60% increase) and diminished NOS catabolic product l-citrulline (~ 18% decrease), with a significant decrease in arginine bioavailability (p < 0.001). We also found a 400% increase in plasma arginase activity in patients with RA compared with control subjects. Several clinical studies have shown that increased arginase activity is associated with endothelial dysfunction in the general population [11]; however, less is known about the RA population. Arginases are localized in the cytoplasm or in the mitochondria of various cell types, including endothelial cells and immune cells, in particular monocytes/macrophages [24, 25]. Systemic Inflammatory conditions can increase arginase expression in these cell types [26]. It is possible that a higher turnover of these cells can cause elevated arginase levels that can be detected in the blood. Arginases are also present in erythrocytes [27, 28], and perturbation of erythrocytes can release arginases into the circulation. One relatively small study showed that serum arginase activity and arginase protein levels were elevated in patients with RA (n = 25) [29]. Our larger study comparing 119 patients with RA and 148 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects showed a robust increase in arginase activity along with a reduced level of its substrate, l-arginine, in the RA plasma. Our analysis shows no association between increased arginase activity and RA disease activity (DAS28 score). This could be due to a relatively low RA disease activity in our cohort (median DAS28 score, 2.7 [1.6–3.5] (Table 1). Alternatively, arginase activity may not elicit a significant effect on the RA pathogenesis per se, but may influence the induction of subclinical endothelial dysfunction in patients with RA. In support of this hypothesis, Prati et al. showed that a specific arginase inhibitor restores endothelial function without ameliorating disease activity in an acute rat model of arthritis [30]. Interestingly, the disconnect was further supported by our observation that seronegative subjects had statistically significant elevated levels of SDMA and ArgMI compared with seropositive patients (Table 3), although the latter showed higher extraarticular disease manifestations. The disconnect between arginase activity and RA disease activity could have clinical implications because arginase activity can be a biomarker of increased CVD risk independent of the patient’s disease state. Negative regulation of NO synthesis can also be mediated via overproduction of methylated arginine analogues such as MMA, ADMA, and SDMA. Among the methylated derivatives, ADMA, a potent endogenous inhibitor of NOS and a marker of endothelial dysfunction, has been shown by our group and others to serve as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular events in the general population [14, 16]. Multiple studies show that ADMA levels were significantly elevated in patients with RA compared with control subjects [31-34]. However, Sandoo et al, showed a lack of association microvascular and macrovascular endothelial function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis [35]. Further, a recent study showed that ADMA levels were inversely correlated with flow-mediated dilation in patients with RA [15]. Erre et al. showed that ADMA is not associated with arterial stiffness in patients with RA [36]. These findings are in agreement with another study that showed supplementation of tetrahydrobiopterin, a cofactor for the production of NO, improved endothelial function but failed to improve aortic stiffness [37]. Our study shows that plasma ADMA is significantly elevated in patients with RA compared with control subjects; in future larger studies, we will include endothelial function and determine the relationship of ADMA/SDMA and endothelial function in an RA group. In our study, levels of SDMA were also significantly elevated in patients with RA (p < 0.001). An elevated SDMA in patients with RA level is associated with an adjusted OR of 1.43 (1.07–1.93, p = 0.0163). However, one group showed a decrease in SDMA level in patients with RA compared with control patients and an inverse correlation between SDMA level and microvascular function [38, 39]. The same group also showed that SDMA levels in patients with RA were independent of cumulative inflammatory burden and that there was no association with cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension [40]. This discrepancy in comparative levels of SDMA in patients with RA between the two studies may be due to multiple factors, including differences in subject age, disease activity, and extent of comorbid renal disease, as well as, more important, divergent techniques used in the measurement of SDMA in the plasma. Although ADMA is emerging as a biomarker of CVD, the implications of elevated circulating SDMA are not well understood. Recent reports, including our group’s, have shown an association between elevated plasma SDMA levels and higher mortality in patients with CVD [17-19]. It has been shown that association of SDMA with CVD risk factors, in particular with hypertension, may arise from compromised renal function [17-19], given that SDMA is eliminated by renal excretion and has been shown to be a marker of estimated glomerular filtration rate [22]. However, multivariable logistic regression analysis (Table 3), adjusted for glomerular filtration rate and plasma creatinine level, demonstrated that elevated SDMA was associated with hypertension in the RA cohort independent of renal function. SDMA interquartile analysis (Table 4) further demonstrated that patients in the highest SDMA quartile had a significantly higher prevalence of hypertension and hyperlipidemia than those in the lowest SDMA quartile. ADMA, ArgMI, and GABR, which have recently emerged as candidate biomarkers of CV risk [14, 16, 18, 20, 23], failed to show significant changes in any of the traditional CVD risk factors analyzed. Our results suggest that SDMA potentially functions as a biomarker of cardiovascular risk factors in RA. More studies are needed to gain an understanding of the underlying mechanisms that link SDMA specifically to hypertension and hyperlipidemia in patients with RA.

Study limitations

One limitation of this study is the relatively small sample size, which may limit the statistical power of the conclusions. We did not evaluate the population characteristics, other than age, sex, and disease activity, in the control population. Also, this was a single-center study using a cross-sectional evaluation of biomarkers. Because this study did not use fasting blood samples, it is possible that plasma levels of arginine and its metabolic products were influenced by food intake. Further, medical interventions that might have the potential to alter plasma l-arginine metabolites were not considered. No direct physiologic vascular measures were taken to directly link dysfunctional arginine metabolism to vascular functional changes and potential cardiovascular risks. We also acknowledge that, other than arginases and NOS, levels of l-arginine, l-citrulline, and l-ornithine can be altered by the aberrant release/uptake of these molecules in and out of the circulation and dysregulation of enzymes that participate in their biosynthesis [10]. We did not measure these parameters in our study. Nevertheless, our studies point to the importance of understanding NO synthesis-related dysfunctional l-arginine metabolic pathways in RA that may provide novel therapeutic and prophylactic approaches to improve vascular health and thereby reduce CVD risk in patients with RA and related rheumatic diseases.

Conclusions

We performed a comprehensive analysis of plasma l-arginine metabolic products and methylated arginine derivatives in a cohort of patients with RA and control subjects. We identified diminished global l-arginine availability and decreased levels of the NOS catabolic product l-citrulline, whereas levels of both arginase activity and its catabolic product l-ornithine were elevated in plasma of patients with RA. Additionally, we found increased levels of endogenous inhibitors of NO production ADMA and SDMA in the plasma of patients with RA. Further, plasma SDMA levels were associated with cardiovascular risk factors, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, whereas elevated arginase activity was associated with prior history of CVD in a subgroup of patients with RA. Our study suggests that increased ArgMI and diminished global arginine bioavailability with concomitant elevated arginase activity in plasma can potentially predict CVD risk in patients with RA. Additional controlled longitudinal studies are required to establish the importance of these pathways in the development of atherosclerosis and cardiac diseases in patients with RA.
  40 in total

1.  Arginase levels are increased in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  L W Huang; K L Chang; C J Chen; H W Liu
Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.744

2.  Evidence for the pathophysiological role of endogenous methylarginines in regulation of endothelial NO production and vascular function.

Authors:  Arturo J Cardounel; Hongmei Cui; Alexandre Samouilov; Wesley Johnson; Patrick Kearns; Ah-Lim Tsai; Vladomir Berka; Jay L Zweier
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-11-01       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  High incidence of cardiovascular events in a rheumatoid arthritis cohort not explained by traditional cardiac risk factors.

Authors:  I D del Rincón; K Williams; M P Stern; G L Freeman; A Escalante
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2001-12

Review 4.  Arginase: an emerging key player in the mammalian immune system.

Authors:  Markus Munder
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  Arginine metabolism: nitric oxide and beyond.

Authors:  G Wu; S M Morris
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  Measurement of trimethylamine-N-oxide by stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Zeneng Wang; Bruce S Levison; Jennie E Hazen; Lillian Donahue; Xin-Min Li; Stanley L Hazen
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.365

7.  Cumulative inflammation associates with asymmetric dimethylarginine in rheumatoid arthritis: a 6 year follow-up study.

Authors:  Aamer Sandoo; Theodoros Dimitroulas; James Hodson; Jacqueline P Smith; Karen M Douglas; George D Kitas
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 7.580

Review 8.  Cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis: recent advances in the understanding of the pivotal role of inflammation, risk predictors and the impact of treatment.

Authors:  Ernest Choy; Kandeepan Ganeshalingam; Anne Grete Semb; Zoltán Szekanecz; Michael Nurmohamed
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 7.580

9.  Arginase II Promotes Macrophage Inflammatory Responses Through Mitochondrial Reactive Oxygen Species, Contributing to Insulin Resistance and Atherogenesis.

Authors:  Xiu-Fen Ming; Angana G Rajapakse; Gautham Yepuri; Yuyan Xiong; João M Carvas; Jean Ruffieux; Isabelle Scerri; Zongsong Wu; Katja Popp; Jianhui Li; Claudio Sartori; Urs Scherrer; Brenda R Kwak; Jean-Pierre Montani; Zhihong Yang
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Symmetric Dimethylarginine Is Not Associated with Cumulative Inflammatory Load or Classical Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A 6-Year Follow-Up Study.

Authors:  Theodoros Dimitroulas; James Hodson; Aamer Sandoo; Jacqueline P Smith; Karen M Douglas; George D Kitas
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 4.711

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Protein arginine methylation: from enigmatic functions to therapeutic targeting.

Authors:  Qin Wu; Matthieu Schapira; Cheryl H Arrowsmith; Dalia Barsyte-Lovejoy
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  Vascular Arginase Is a Relevant Target to Improve Cerebrovascular Endothelial Dysfunction in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Evidence from the Model of Adjuvant-Induced Arthritis.

Authors:  Romain Bordy; Aurore Quirié; Christine Marie; Daniel Wendling; Perle Totoson; Céline Demougeot
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 6.829

3.  Metabolomics profiling predicts outcome of tocilizumab in rheumatoid arthritis: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Jessica D Murillo-Saich; Cesar Diaz-Torne; M Angeles Ortiz; Roxana Coras; Paulo Gil-Alabarse; Anders Pedersen; Hector Corominas; Silvia Vidal; Monica Guma
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2021-08-16       Impact factor: 4.747

Review 4.  Metabolic Profiling in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Psoriatic Arthritis, and Psoriasis: Elucidating Pathogenesis, Improving Diagnosis, and Monitoring Disease Activity.

Authors:  Erika Dorochow; Michaela Köhm; Lisa Hahnefeld; Robert Gurke
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-02

5.  Asymmetric and symmetric dimethylarginine concentration as an indicator of cardiovascular diseases in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies.

Authors:  Parisa Zafari; Ahmadreza Zarifian; Reza Alizadeh-Navaei; Mahdi Taghadosi; Alireza Rafiei; Zahra Samimi; Fatemeh Niksolat
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Exhaled nitric oxide in early rheumatoid arthritis and effects of methotrexate treatment.

Authors:  Tomas Weitoft; Anders Lind; Anders Larsson; Johan Rönnelid; Marieann Högman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Subclinical and clinical atherosclerosis in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the 3-year, multicentre, prospective, observational GIRRCS (Gruppo Italiano di Ricerca in Reumatologia Clinica e Sperimentale) study.

Authors:  Piero Ruscitti; Paola Cipriani; Vasiliki Liakouli; Daniela Iacono; Ilenia Pantano; Domenico Paolo Emanuele Margiotta; Luca Navarini; Giulia Maria Destro Castaniti; Nicola Maruotti; Gerardo Di Scala; Licia Picciariello; Francesco Caso; Sara Bongiovanni; Rosa Daniela Grembiale; Fabiola Atzeni; Raffaele Scarpa; Federico Perosa; Giacomo Emmi; Francesco Paolo Cantatore; Giuliana Guggino; Antonella Afeltra; Francesco Ciccia; Roberto Giacomelli
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 5.156

8.  Immunoregulatory Interplay Between Arginine and Tryptophan Metabolism in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Giada Mondanelli; Alberta Iacono; Massimo Allegrucci; Paolo Puccetti; Ursula Grohmann
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 9.  Role of the eNOS Uncoupling and the Nitric Oxide Metabolic Pathway in the Pathogenesis of Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

Authors:  Anna Łuczak; Marta Madej; Agata Kasprzyk; Adrian Doroszko
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 6.543

Review 10.  Amino Acid Metabolism in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Friend or Foe?

Authors:  Eleonora Panfili; Roberto Gerli; Ursula Grohmann; Maria Teresa Pallotta
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2020-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.