Literature DB >> 29883832

COMT and the neurogenetic architecture of hearing loss induced tinnitus.

Sven Vanneste1, Ola Alsalman2, Dirk De Ridder3.   

Abstract

As the COMT polymorphism is especially prominent in the prefrontal cortex and has been associated with auditory gating, we hypothesize that tinnitus patients with this polymorphism have altered activity in the ventromedial prefrontal/anterior cingulate areas that modulates the tinnitus percept. To test this, we recruited a total of 40 tinnitus subjects and 20 healthy controls for an EEG study. A comparison between tinnitus subjects and healthy controls and their frequency of being Val/Val genotype or Met carriers (including Val/Met and Met/Met genotype) shows no significant effect, suggesting that the distributions for the tinnitus and healthy groups are similar. Our results show that an interaction between the amount of hearing loss and the COMT Val158Met polymorphism can increase susceptibility to the clinical manifestation of tinnitus. We further demonstrate that the parahippocampus becomes involved in tinnitus in patients with hearing loss that are Met carriers. In these patients, the parahippocampus sends more tinnitus information to the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex and auditory cortex that is specifically related with increased loudness. At the same time, the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, which normally functions as a gatekeeper, is not cancelling this auditory information, ultimately leading to increased tinnitus loudness.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COMT; Met carriers; Noise cancelling mechanism; Parahippocampus; Phantom sounds; Pregenual anterior cingulate cortex; Sensory gating; Tinnitus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29883832     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  6 in total

1.  Top-down and Bottom-up Regulated Auditory Phantom Perception.

Authors:  Sven Vanneste; Ola Alsalman; Dirk De Ridder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Cortical Oscillatory Signatures Reveal the Prerequisites for Tinnitus Perception: A Comparison of Subjects With Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss With and Without Tinnitus.

Authors:  Sang-Yeon Lee; Byung Yoon Choi; Ja-Won Koo; Dirk De Ridder; Jae-Jin Song
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 3.  Analysis of Studies in Tinnitus-Related Gene Research.

Authors:  Zhi-Cheng Li; Bi-Xing Fang; Lian-Xiong Yuan; Ke Zheng; Shi-Xin Wu; Nanbert Zhong; Xiang-Li Zeng
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 0.867

Review 4.  Too Blind to See the Elephant? Why Neuroscientists Ought to Be Interested in Tinnitus.

Authors:  Marlies Knipper; Birgit Mazurek; Pim van Dijk; Holger Schulze
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-10-22

5.  Investigating functional changes in the brain to intermittently induced auditory illusions and its relevance to chronic tinnitus.

Authors:  Anusha Mohan; Neil Bhamoo; Juan S Riquelme; Samantha Long; Arnaud Norena; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Alterations of brain activity and functional connectivity in transition from acute to chronic tinnitus.

Authors:  Liping Lan; Jiahong Li; Yanhong Chen; Wan Chen; Wenrui Li; Fei Zhao; Guisheng Chen; Jiahao Liu; Yuchen Chen; Yuanqing Li; Chang-Dong Wang; Yiqing Zheng; Yuexin Cai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 5.399

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.