Literature DB >> 298834

The development of a method of assessing swelling following third molar surgery.

C S Holland.   

Abstract

A method of measuring post-operative facial swelling following third molar surgery should satisfy the following criteria. Firstly, the accuracy should be assessed, secondly the measurement should be in volume units, and thirdly the method should be both practical and ethical in the clinical situation and not limited by static apparatus. No published method satisfies all of these criteria. In an attempt to develop a satisfactory method, direct physical measurements using a face bow, ultrasound and portable stereophotogrammetry were investigated. None of these three methods was limited by static apparatus. Portable stereophotogrammetry could not be used because of variations in posing for which a correction could not be applied. Repeated measurements on non-operated subjects showed that the face bow was more accurate than the ultrasound method at a single measurement site. Therefore, the face bow method was developed to give volume measurements in cubic centrimetres by using nine measurement sites at the intersections of a square grid located over the swelling. The mean difference between two readings taken on separate occasions on non-operated subjects was -0.94 cc (s.d. +/- 1.90). The mean swelling measured at twenty third molar operation sites was 23.19 cc. It is concluded that this face bow method satisfies the criteria laid down.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 298834     DOI: 10.1016/s0007-117x(79)80037-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Surg        ISSN: 0007-117X


  8 in total

1.  Comparison of primary and secondary closure of the surgical wound after removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

Authors:  Anisha Maria; Murtuza Malik; Parag Virang
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-09-23

2.  Efficacy of methylprednisolone in controlling complications after impacted lower third molar surgical extraction.

Authors:  J M Micó-Llorens; M Satorres-Nieto; J Gargallo-Albiol; J Arnabat-Domínguez; L Berini-Aytés; C Gay-Escoda
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 2.953

3.  Impact of Aprotinin - A Proteolytic Enzyme on Postsurgical Symptoms in Patients Undergoing Third Molar Surgeries.

Authors:  Visakan Jegadeesan; Deepa Ponnaiyan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-01-01

4.  Randomized double blind comparative study on the efficacy of Ibuprofen and aceclofenac in controlling post-operative sequelae after third molar surgery.

Authors:  Neha Jain; Anisha Maria
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-04-22

5.  The efficacy of intralesional dexamethasone versus intravenous dexamethasone in surgery for impacted third molars: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Amiya Agrawal; Siddhartha Chandel; Nishi Singh; Arunesh Kumar Tiwari; Akhilesh Kumar Singh; Gaurav Singh
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-06-18

6.  Role of Serratiopeptidase and Dexamethasone in the Control of Postoperative Swelling.

Authors:  B Pramod Krishna; B Praveen Reddy; D S Yashavanth Kumar; M Ummar; Vijay Shekhar; Rahul Vinay Chandra Tiwari
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-06-08

7.  Is the degree of facial swelling after dental extraction sufficient to justify the current delays to radiotherapy mask production? A pilot evaluation of postextraction swelling using 3D photography.

Authors:  Robert McCormick; John Meechan; James Adams; Helen Stanncliffe; Lee Merecer; Kate Best; Michael Nugent
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2022-02-14

8.  Effect of drain application on postoperative complaints after surgical removal of impacted wisdom teeth-a randomized observer-blinded split-mouth clinical trial.

Authors:  Marie Sophie Katz; Florian Peters; Dirk Elvers; Philipp Winterhalder; Kristian Kniha; Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Frank Hölzle; Ali Modabber
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 3.573

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.