Shelagh A Mulvaney1,2,3, Sarah Vaala1, Korey K Hood4, Cindy Lybarger3, Rachel Carroll1, Laura Williams1, Douglas C Schmidt5, Kevin Johnson2, Mary S Dietrich1,6, Lori Laffel7. 1. 1 School of Nursing, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee. 2. 2 Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center , Nashville, Tennessee. 3. 3 Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center , Nashville, Tennessee. 4. 4 Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University , Palo Alto, California. 5. 5 School of Engineering, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee. 6. 6 Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University , Nashville, Tennessee. 7. 7 Joslin Diabetes Center, Harvard University , Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Integration of momentary contextual and psychosocial factors within self-management feedback may provide more specific, engaging, and personalized targets for problem solving. METHODS:Forty-four youth ages 13-19 with type 1 diabetes (T1D) were provided a Bluetooth meter and completed the 30-day protocol. Participants were randomized to "app + meter" or "meter-only" groups. App + meter participants completed mealtime and bedtime assessment each day. Assessments focused on psychosocial and contextual information relevant for self-management. Graphical feedback integrated self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG), insulin, and Bluetooth-transmitted blood glucose data with the psychosocial and contextual data. App + meter participants completed an interview to identify data patterns. RESULTS: The median number of momentary assessments per participant was 80.0 (range 32-120) with 2.60 per day. By 2 weeks participants had an average of 40.77 (SD 12.23) assessments. Dose-response analyses indicated that the number of app assessments submitted were significantly related to higher mean daily SMBG (r = -0.44, P < 0.05) and to lower% missed mealtime SMBG (r = -0.47, P < 0.01). Number of feedback viewing sessions was also significantly related to a lower% missed mealtime SMBG (r = -0.44, P < 0.05). Controlling for baseline variables, mixed-effects analyses did not indicate group × time differences in mean daily SMBG. Engagement analyses resulted in three trajectory groups distinguished by assessment frequencies and rates of decline. Engagement group membership was significantly related to gender, mean daily SMBG, and HbA1c values. CONCLUSIONS: Momentary assessment combined with device data provided a feasible means to provide novel personalized biobehavioral feedback for adolescents with T1D. A 2-week protocol provided sufficient data for self-management problem identification. In addition to feedback, more intensive intervention may need to be integrated for those patients with the lowest self-management at baseline.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Integration of momentary contextual and psychosocial factors within self-management feedback may provide more specific, engaging, and personalized targets for problem solving. METHODS: Forty-four youth ages 13-19 with type 1 diabetes (T1D) were provided a Bluetooth meter and completed the 30-day protocol. Participants were randomized to "app + meter" or "meter-only" groups. App + meter participants completed mealtime and bedtime assessment each day. Assessments focused on psychosocial and contextual information relevant for self-management. Graphical feedback integrated self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG), insulin, and Bluetooth-transmitted blood glucose data with the psychosocial and contextual data. App + meter participants completed an interview to identify data patterns. RESULTS: The median number of momentary assessments per participant was 80.0 (range 32-120) with 2.60 per day. By 2 weeks participants had an average of 40.77 (SD 12.23) assessments. Dose-response analyses indicated that the number of app assessments submitted were significantly related to higher mean daily SMBG (r = -0.44, P < 0.05) and to lower% missed mealtime SMBG (r = -0.47, P < 0.01). Number of feedback viewing sessions was also significantly related to a lower% missed mealtime SMBG (r = -0.44, P < 0.05). Controlling for baseline variables, mixed-effects analyses did not indicate group × time differences in mean daily SMBG. Engagement analyses resulted in three trajectory groups distinguished by assessment frequencies and rates of decline. Engagement group membership was significantly related to gender, mean daily SMBG, and HbA1c values. CONCLUSIONS: Momentary assessment combined with device data provided a feasible means to provide novel personalized biobehavioral feedback for adolescents with T1D. A 2-week protocol provided sufficient data for self-management problem identification. In addition to feedback, more intensive intervention may need to be integrated for those patients with the lowest self-management at baseline.
Entities:
Keywords:
Adolescent; Ecological momentary assessment; Engagement; Feedback; Mobile health.; Type 1 diabetes
Authors: Shelagh A Mulvaney; Sarah S Jaser; Russell L Rothman; William E Russell; Eric J Pittel; Cindy Lybarger; Kenneth A Wallston Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2014-07-12
Authors: Lian van der Krieke; Frank J Blaauw; Ando C Emerencia; Hendrika M Schenk; Joris P J Slaets; Elisabeth H Bos; Peter de Jonge; Bertus F Jeronimus Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2017 Feb/Mar Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Carol A Maher; Lucy K Lewis; Katia Ferrar; Simon Marshall; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij; Corneel Vandelanotte Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Meg Bruening; Irene van Woerden; Michael Todd; Stephanie Brennhofer; Melissa N Laska; Genevieve Dunton Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-07-27 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Tamara K Oser; Sean M Oser; Jessica A Parascando; Danielle Hessler-Jones; Christopher N Sciamanna; Kerri Sparling; Donald Nease; Michelle L Litchman Journal: Curr Diab Rep Date: 2020-02-20 Impact factor: 4.810
Authors: Shelagh A Mulvaney; Sarah E Vaala; Rachel B Carroll; Laura K Williams; Cindy K Lybarger; Douglas C Schmidt; Mary S Dietrich; Lori M Laffel; Korey K Hood Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Alexandra M Psihogios; Mashfiqui Rabbi; Annisa Ahmed; Elise R McKelvey; Yimei Li; Jean-Philippe Laurenceau; Stephen P Hunger; Linda Fleisher; Ahna Lh Pai; Lisa A Schwartz; Susan A Murphy; Lamia P Barakat Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2021-10-22