Donald Addington1, Maximillian Birchwood2, Peter Jones3, Eoin Killackey4, David McDaid5, Marianne Melau6, Masafumi Mizuno7, Kim Mueser8, Merete Nordentoft9. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. 2. Faculty of Medicine, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK. 3. Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. 4. Center for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 5. Personal Social Services Research Unit London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. 6. The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark. 7. Department of Neuropsychiatry, Toho University, Tokyo, Japan. 8. Centre for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts. 9. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Abstract
AIM: The purpose of this paper is to review fidelity and outcome measures which can be used to support broad implementation of first episode psychosis services and ensure quality of existing services. First episode psychosis services use a combination of evidence-based practices to improve the outcome of a first episode of psychosis and the early stages of schizophrenia. Now that there is an established international evidence base to show that they are effective, efforts are being made to make such services widely available as a routine part of health care. METHODS: We provide an overview of the literature from the perspective of an expert task force that was commissioned to report to the board of the International Early Psychosis Association IEPA. First, we examined the evidence-based components that underpin first episode psychosis services and identified common elements. Next, we reviewed the availability of fidelity measures and outcome indicators, finally we reviewed how broadly these services are delivered internationally, and the barriers to ensuring broad access to quality services. RESULTS: There is a growing consensus about the elements required to deliver effective services. Fidelity scales and performance measures are available to assess quality, access, and outcome. First episode psychosis services are variably offered in high-income countries and rarely with attention to access and quality of services. Several strategies to promote implementation are identified. CONCLUSIONS: Fidelity scales and outcome measure are valuable resources to support widespread implementation and quality assurance for first episode psychosis services.
AIM: The purpose of this paper is to review fidelity and outcome measures which can be used to support broad implementation of first episode psychosis services and ensure quality of existing services. First episode psychosis services use a combination of evidence-based practices to improve the outcome of a first episode of psychosis and the early stages of schizophrenia. Now that there is an established international evidence base to show that they are effective, efforts are being made to make such services widely available as a routine part of health care. METHODS: We provide an overview of the literature from the perspective of an expert task force that was commissioned to report to the board of the International Early Psychosis Association IEPA. First, we examined the evidence-based components that underpin first episode psychosis services and identified common elements. Next, we reviewed the availability of fidelity measures and outcome indicators, finally we reviewed how broadly these services are delivered internationally, and the barriers to ensuring broad access to quality services. RESULTS: There is a growing consensus about the elements required to deliver effective services. Fidelity scales and performance measures are available to assess quality, access, and outcome. First episode psychosis services are variably offered in high-income countries and rarely with attention to access and quality of services. Several strategies to promote implementation are identified. CONCLUSIONS: Fidelity scales and outcome measure are valuable resources to support widespread implementation and quality assurance for first episode psychosis services.
Keywords:
first episode psychosis; health care; quality indicators; schizophrenia early intervention; schizophrenia epidemiology; schizophrenia prevention and control
Authors: Anna-Leigh Powell; Cassandra Hinger; Erica D Marshall-Lee; Tonya Miller-Roberts; Kayla Phillips Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2020-05-29
Authors: Kim T Mueser; Piper S Meyer-Kalos; Shirley M Glynn; David W Lynde; Delbert G Robinson; Susan Gingerich; David L Penn; Corrine Cather; Jennifer D Gottlieb; Patricia Marcy; Jennifer L Wiseman; Sheena Potretzke; Mary F Brunette; Nina R Schooler; Jean Addington; Robert A Rosenheck; Sue E Estroff; John M Kane Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2018-08-20 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Julia Browne; A Simone Sanders; Michelle Friedman-Yakoobian; Margaret Guyer; Matcheri Keshavan; Bo Kim; Emily Kline Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2020-11-08 Impact factor: 2.721
Authors: Paula Pires de Oliveira Padilha; Bastian Bertulies-Esposito; Sophie L'Heureux; David Olivier; Shalini Lal; Amal Abdel-Baki Journal: Early Interv Psychiatry Date: 2021-10-08 Impact factor: 2.721
Authors: Stefan Siebert; Karolina Leopold; Johanna Baumgardt; Laura-Sophie von Hardenberg; Eva Burkhardt; Andreas Bechdolf Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 5.760