| Literature DB >> 29881713 |
Roghayeh Pakdel1, Saeed Niazmand2, Mohsen Mouhebati3, Mohammad Mahdi Vahedi4, Azita Aghaee5, Mousa-Al-Reza Hadjzadeh1,6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of Portulaca oleracea (Po) seeds extract and those of valsartan on cardiac function in levothyroxine (T4)-treated rats.Entities:
Keywords: Echocardiography; Hemodynamic parameters; Hyperthyroidism; Levothyroxine; Portulaca oleracea; Valsartan
Year: 2018 PMID: 29881713 PMCID: PMC5987442
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Phytomed ISSN: 2228-7930
Thyroid hormones levels after 4-week treatment in different groups of rats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.76±0.08 | 1.83±0.20 | 1.27±0.30 | 0.68±0.11 |
|
| 6.40±0.61 | 7.18±0.30 | 7.62±0.52 | 6.84±0.50 |
|
| 126.71±0.9 | 126.67±1.99 | 124.14±2.86 | 117.30± 2.42 |
All data are presented as the mean±SEM.
p<0.05 and
p<0.001 indicate significant differences compared to control.
p<0.05 and
p<0.01 indicate significant differences compared to T4-treated group. SEM: Standard error of the mean, Val: Valsartan, Po: Portulaca oleracea (n=6-10).
Changes in heart weight, heart weight/ body weight and hemodynamic parameters in different groups of rats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 855.45±16.64 | 913.33±12.51 | 876.66±20.01 | 825.00±22.91 |
|
| 2.97±0.04 | 3.37±0.06 | 3.29±0.06 | 3.29±0.06 |
|
| 189.03±6.72 | 240.27±16.10 | 211.27±12.89 | 203.10±11.87 |
|
| 99.72±4.40 | 130.11±3.22 | 111.73±3.76 | 110.64±4.18 |
|
| 1.29±1.54 | 1.52±2.10 | 2.44±1.65 | 2.91±1.77 |
All data are presented as the mean±SEM.
p<0.05 and
p<0.001 indicate significant differences compared to control.
p<0.01 indicates significant differences compared to T4-treated group. SEM: Standard error of mean; Val: Valsartan; Po: Portulaca oleracea; LVSP: left ventricular systolic pressure; LVEDP: left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; and HR: heart rate (n=6-10).
The results of echocardiography in different groups.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 66.18±1.63 | 62.70±1.86 | 60.67±1.85 | 66.25 ±3.02 |
|
| 31.27±1.56 | 28.30±1.61 | 27.33±1.78 | 31.75±2.73 |
|
| 0.65±0.03 | 0.80±0.03 | 0.80±0.71 | 0.57±0.31 |
|
| 0.43±0.02 | 0.56±0.02 | 0.61±0.06 | 0.37±0.041 |
All data are presented as mean±SEM.
p<0.01 indicates significant differences compared to control;
p<0.05,
p<0.01, and
p<0.001 indicate significant differences compared to T4-treated group.
p<0.01 and
p<0.001 indicate significant differences compared to T4- Val; SEM: Standard error of mean; Val: Valsartan, Po: Portulaca oleracea; EF: Ejection fraction; FS: Fractional shortening; EDD: End diastolic diameter; and ESD: End systolic diameter (n=6-10).
Figure 1Comparison of the body weight during the 4 weeks among different groups using repeated measure ANOVA. All data are presented as mean±SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 indicate significant differences compared to control group. +p<0.05 indicates significant differences compared to T4 group. SEM: Standard error of mean; Val: Valsartan; and Po: Portulaca oleracea (n=10)
Figure 2Comparison of the body weight gain percentage in different groups. All data are presented as mean±SEM. *p<0.05, **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001 indicate significant differences compared to control group. SEM: Standard error of mean, Val: Valsartan; and Po: Portulaca oleracea (n=10).