| Literature DB >> 29881690 |
Hytham Salem1, Aaron Carter1, Fotios Tjoumakaris1, Kevin B Freedman1.
Abstract
Rotator cuff pathology is a common cause of shoulder pain in the athletic and general population. Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCT) are commonly encountered and can be bursal-sided, articular-sided, or intratendinous. Various techniques exist for the repair of bursal-sided PTRCTs. The 2 main distinctions when addressing these lesions include tear completion versus preservation of the intact fibers, and single- versus double-row suture anchor fixation. We present our method for addressing bursal-sided PTRCTs using an in situ repair technique with double-row suture anchors.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29881690 PMCID: PMC5989650 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2017.08.068
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthrosc Tech ISSN: 2212-6287
Fig 1With the patient in the beach chair position, arthroscopic imaging from the lateral viewing portal shows a partial-thickness bursal-sided rotator cuff tear of the left supraspinatus tendon after debridement.
Fig 2With the patient in the beach-chair position, arthroscopic imaging from the lateral viewing portal shows the placement of a triple-loaded Healix Advance 5.5-mm Peek Suture Anchor with Orthocord (DePuy Mitek) placed at the most medial margin of the intact supraspinatus tendon insertion to create the medial row.
Fig 3Arthroscopic imaging of the left shoulder from the lateral viewing portal shows the placement of 3 individual horizontal mattress sutures placed through the rotator cuff tissue.
Fig 4Arthroscopic imaging of the left shoulder from the lateral viewing portal shows the placement of a lateral-row anchor with an additional suture incorporated into the lateral-row anchor at the time of insertion to further reduce the cuff tissue to the footprint.
Pearls and Pitfalls
| Pearls | Pitfalls |
|---|---|
| ♦ An extra suture can be incorporated into lateral-row anchors to further reduce rotator cuff tissue | ♦ Careful attention must be paid during debridement to avoid damage to intact articular fibers |
| ♦ Careful attention should be focused on the spread of medial-row suture limbs across cuff tear to ensure adequate reduction |
Fig 5Arthroscopic imaging of the left shoulder from the lateral viewing portal shows the completed repair of a partial-thickness bursal-sided rotator cuff tear with 2 lateral anchors.
Fig 6Arthroscopic imaging of a right shoulder from the lateral viewing portal shows the completed repair of a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear with a single lateral-row suture anchor.
Rehabilitation Program After Repair
| Range of Motion | Immobilizer | Therapeutic Exercise | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase I (0-4 weeks) | Passive range only—to tolerance | Sling with supporting abduction pillow to be worn at all times except for hygiene and therapeutic exercise | Codman's, elbow/wrist/hand ROM, grip strengthening, isometric scapular stabilization |
| Phase II (4-8 weeks) | 4-6 weeks: Gentle passive stretch to 160° of forward flexion, 60° external rotation at side, and abduction to 60°-80° | None | 4-6 weeks: Begin gentle active assistive/active exercises, begin gentle joint mobilizations (grade I and II), continue with phase I exercises |
| 6-8 weeks: increase ROM to tolerance | 6-8 weeks: Begin active exercises and deltoid/biceps strengthening | ||
| Phase III (8-12 weeks) | Progress to full motion without discomfort | None | Continue with scapular strengthening, progress exercises in phase II, begin internal/external rotation isometrics, stretch posterior capsule when arm is warmed up |
| Phase IV (12 weeks-5 months) | Full motion without discomfort | None | Advance exercises in phase III, begin sport-specific activities, maintain flexibility, increase velocity of motion, return to sport activities |
Advantages and Disadvantages
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| ♦ Greater tendon-bone contact area is achieved with a double-row technique compared with single-row constructs | ♦ Entire thickness of cuff tissue not incorporated into repair with our proposed technique |
| ♦ Preserved integrity of anatomic footprint with an in situ method compared with the tear-completion method | ♦ May be more technically demanding than the tear completion method |