| Literature DB >> 29881556 |
Yusuke Noguchi1, Daisuke Tomizawa1,2, Haruka Hiroki1, Satoshi Miyamoto1, Mari Tezuka1,3, Reiji Miyawaki1,4, Mari Tanaka-Kubota1, Tubasa Okano1, Chika Kobayashi1, Noriko Mitsuiki1, Yuki Aoki1,5, Kohsuke Imai1, Michiko Kajiwara6, Hirokazu Kanegane1, Tomohiro Morio1, Masatoshi Takagi1.
Abstract
Myeloid/natural killer cell precursor acute leukemia (MNKPL) is a rare leukemia subtype characterized by a high incidence of extramedullary infiltration. No appropriate treatment strategy has so far been developed. Acute myelogenous leukemia-type chemotherapy combined with L-Asparaginase is an effective treatment for MNKPL. Hematopoietic cell transplantation is a second option in refractory cases.Entities:
Keywords: Hematopoietic cell transplantation; L‐Asparaginase; myeloid/natural killer cell precursor acute leukemia
Year: 2018 PMID: 29881556 PMCID: PMC5986054 DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.1506
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Case Rep ISSN: 2050-0904
Figure 1(A) 18F‐FDG PET/CT shows hypermetabolic lesions in multiple lymphoid organs, especially the bilateral cervical and axillar lymph nodes. FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose; PET/CT, positron emission tomography/computed tomography. (B) Wright–Giemsa staining of a bone marrow aspiration smear. Blast cells are relatively large and harbor fine azurophilic granules in the cytoplasm.
Laboratory data on initial diagnosis
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WBC | 1.7 × 109/L (Blasts, 0%) | TP | 8.4 g/dL | ||||
| RBC | 4.49 × 1012/L | BUN | 4 mg/dL | ||||
| Hb | 13.7 g/dL | Cre | 0.19 mg/dL | ||||
| HCT | 38.6% | LDH | 408 U/L | ||||
| Platelet | 1.88 × 1011/L | AST | 51 U/L | ||||
| Reticulocyte | 14.8‰ | ALT | 30 U/L | ||||
| CRP | 1.62 mg/dL | ||||||
| sIL2R | 992 U/mL | ||||||
|
|
| ||||||
| Nuclear cell count | 2.6 × 1010/L | 47,XY, +10 [7/20] | |||||
| Megakaryocytes | 15/ | ||||||
| Blasts | 36.3% | ||||||
| Blast cells were MPO‐negative/esterase‐negative. | |||||||
|
| |||||||
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| CD19 | 2.2% | CD2 | 7.1% | cMPO | 21.9% | CD34 | 98.2% |
| CD20 | 0.8% | CD5 | 0.8% | CD13 | 7.4% | CD38 | 91.5% |
| CD10 | 3.0% | CD3 | 0.6% | CD33 | 99.1% | HLA‐DR | 4.9% |
| CD7 | 80.2% | CD117 | 22.0% | ||||
| CD56 | 98.5% | CD11b | 97.1% | ||||
MPO, myeloperoxidase.
Figure 2(A) Photomicrograph of a lymph node specimen. H‐E = hematoxylin–eosin staining. Low = lower magnification, High = higher magnification. (B) Dot blot graph of flow cytometric data. The CD45 dull population was analyzed using the indicated antibody. NC = normal control IgG.
Figure 3Clinical course of the patient. CM: cytarabine, 200 mg/m2 × 7 days + mitoxantrone, 5 mg/m2 × 5 days; HCEI: cytarabine, 3 g/m2 q12 h × 3 days + etoposide, 100 mg/m2 × 5 days + idarubicin, 10 mg/m2; HCM: cytarabine, 2 g/m2 q12 h × 3 days + mitoxantrone, 5 mg/m2 × 5 days; L‐asparaginase: 10,000 U/m2; TIT: methotrexate, 12 mg + cytarabine, 30 mg + hydrocortisone, 25 mg; IDA‐FLAG: IDA, 10 mg/m2 × 3 days + fludarabine, 30 mg/m2 × 5 days + cytarabine, 2 g/m2 q12 h × 3 days + G‐CSF, 5 μg/kg × 6 days; Capizzi: cytarabine 3 g/m2 q12 h × 3 days + L‐Asp, 10,000 U/m2 × 5 days; LDEC: AraC, 20 mg/m2 × 1 day + etoposide, 30 mg/m2 × 1 day.
Literature review of MNKPL cases
| Case | Age | Sex | Treatment | Type of HCT | Outcome | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Child cases | ||||||
| 1 | 17 | M | AML, ALL, VP16 + AraC | Haplo BMT | Relapse after 20 months |
|
| 2 | 12.5 | M | ALL+MIT, AraC, VP16 | 63 months |
| |
| 3 | 8.5 | M | ALL+MIT, AraC, VP16 | 38 months |
| |
| 4 | 1.3 | M | ALL+MIT, AraC, VP16 | 26 months |
| |
| 5 | 3.8 | M | ALL+MIT, AraC, VP16 | 7 months |
| |
| 6 | 5 | F | AML+L‐Asp | 40 months |
| |
| 7 | 6 | F | AML+L‐Asp | CBT | 46 months |
|
| 8 | 1 | M | AML, ALL | HLA mis related BMT | 7 months after HCT |
|
| 9 | 14 | F | AraC, ADR, VP16 | Sib BMT | ND |
|
| 10 | 18 | M | ALL | Sib BMT | Relapse after 1 month |
|
| 11 | 2 | M | ALL, AML+L‐Asp | CBT | 24 months |
|
| 12 | 0.9 | F | VCR, ADR, CPM | Auto BMT | 3 months |
|
| 13 | 19 | M | CHOP+L‐Asp, DCVP | Related BMT | 19 months |
|
| Adult cases | ||||||
| 1 | 63 | M | Before chemotherapy |
| ||
| 2 | 21 | M | DOAP, IDA, AraC, FLAG | ND |
| |
| 3 | 74 | F | ND |
| ||
| 4 | 62 | M | ND |
| ||
| 5 | 34 | M | MIT, AraC, VP16 (after HCT) | Unrelated BMT | 24 months |
|
| 6 | 37 | F | AraC, IDA | 1 month |
| |
| 7 | 36 | M | MIT, AraC, VP16 | Unrelated PBSCT | Donor derived MDS at 7 months |
|
| 8 | 34 | M | AraC, IDA | ND |
| |
| 9 | 34 | M | CHOP, DCVP | 17 months |
| |
| 10 | 46 | M | DCVP | 4 months |
| |
| 11 | 54 | M | DCMP | 30 months |
| |
| 12 | 29 | F | DCMP | Sib BMT | 19 months due to GVHD |
|
| 13 | 48 | M | ALL | 41 months |
| |
| 14 | 59 | M | Low dose AraC, DCVP | 11 months |
| |
HCT, hematopoietic cell transplantation; AML, AML‐type chemotherapy; ALL, ALL‐type chemotherapy; AraC, cytarabine VP16, etoposide; MIT, mitoxantrone; L‐Asp, L‐asparaginase; ADR, adriamycin; CPM, cyclophosphamide; CHOP, CPM + ADR + vincristine (VCR) + prednisolone (PSL); DOAP, daunorubicin (DNR) + VCR + AraC + PSL; DCMP, daunorubicin (DNR) + AraC + 6‐mercaptopurine + PSL; DCVP, DNR + AraC + VCR + PSL; BMT, bone marrow transplantation; Haplo BMT, haploidentical matched BMT; CBT, cord blood transplantation; PBSCT, peripheral blood stem cell transplantation; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; sib, sibling; mis, mismatch; auto, autologous.
Dead.