Literature DB >> 29881108

Investigating the Behaviors of M2 and RMSEA2 in Fitting a Unidimensional Model to Multidimensional Data.

Jie Xu1, Insu Paek1, Yan Xia2.   

Abstract

It has been widely known that the Type I error rates of goodness-of-fit tests using full information test statistics, such as Pearson's test statistic χ2 and the likelihood ratio test statistic G2, are problematic when data are sparse. Under such conditions, the limited information goodness-of-fit test statistic M2 is recommended in model fit assessment for models with binary response data. A simulation study was conducted to investigate the power and Type I error rate of M2 in fitting unidimensional models to many different types of multidimensional data. As an additional interest, the behavior of RMSEA2 was also examined, which is the root mean square error approximation (RMSEA) based on M2. Findings from the current study showed that M2 and RMSEA2 are sensitive in detecting the misfits due to varying slope parameters, the bifactor structure, and the partially (or completely) simple structure for multidimensional data, but not the misfits due to the within-item multidimensional structures.

Keywords:  M2; item response theory; limited information statistic; multidimensional structures

Year:  2017        PMID: 29881108      PMCID: PMC5978478          DOI: 10.1177/0146621617710464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  6 in total

1.  A goodness of fit test for sparse 2p contingency tables.

Authors:  David J Bartholomew; Shing On Leung
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Type I errors and power of the parametric bootstrap goodness-of-fit test: full and limited information.

Authors:  Nikolaj Tollenaar; Ab Mooijaart
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of hierarchical item factor models.

Authors:  Li Cai; Mark Hansen
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  Goodness-of-Fit Testing for Latent Class Models.

Authors:  L M Collins; P L Fidler; S E Wugalter; J D Long
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Assessing Approximate Fit in Categorical Data Analysis.

Authors:  Alberto Maydeu-Olivares; Harry Joe
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of item response theory models for sparse 2 tables.

Authors:  Li Cai; Albert Maydeu-Olivares; Donna L Coffman; David Thissen
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.380

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.