Literature DB >> 29881101

Incorporating Criterion Ratings Into Model-Based Rater Monitoring Procedures Using Latent-Class Signal Detection Theory.

Brian F Patterson1, Stefanie A Wind2, George Engelhard3.   

Abstract

This study presents a new criterion-referenced approach for exploring rating quality within the framework of latent-class signal detection theory (LC-SDT) that goes beyond commonly used reliability indices, and provides substantively meaningful indicators of rater accuracy that can be used to inform rater training and monitoring at the individual rater level. Specifically, this study illustrates a flexible application of restricted LC-SDT modeling, in which restrictions can be specified for the true latent classification to reflect the unique characteristics of a particular assessment context. While the LC-SDT modeling framework provides immediately useful characterizations of raters' behavior, the restricted LC-SDT offers complementary evidence to further support the monitoring of rater behavior by bringing criterion ratings to bear. This study uses ratings from a large-scale writing assessment, and findings suggest that the criterion (i.e., restricted) LC-SDT provides useful information about rating quality for operational raters relative to criterion ratings, which may ultimately inform rater training and monitoring procedures.

Keywords:  expert rater; latent-class model; rater effects; signal detection theory; writing assessment

Year:  2017        PMID: 29881101      PMCID: PMC5978520          DOI: 10.1177/0146621617698452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  4 in total

1.  Processes affecting scores on understanding of others and assumed similarity.

Authors:  L J CRONBACH
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1955-05       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  A Latent Class Extension of Signal Detection Theory, with Applications.

Authors:  Lawrence T DeCarlo
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Constructing rater and task banks for performance assessments.

Authors:  G Engelhard
Journal:  J Outcome Meas       Date:  1997

4.  Evaluating Rater Accuracy in Rater-Mediated Assessments Using an Unfolding Model.

Authors:  Jue Wang; George Engelhard; Edward W Wolfe
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 2.821

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  Exploring the Combined Effects of Rater Misfit and Differential Rater Functioning in Performance Assessments.

Authors:  Stefanie A Wind; Wenjing Guo
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 2.821

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.