| Literature DB >> 29880870 |
Shuang Lu1, Huanying Yang1, Fei Li1, Yinglin Wang2, Shixin Chen1, Guochun Yang1, Yichun Liu1, Xintong Zhang3.
Abstract
Development of cost-effective counter electrode (CE) materials is a key issue for practical applications of photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion. Kesterite Cu2ZnSnS4 (CZTS) has been recognized as a potential CE material, but its electrocatalytic activity is still insufficient for the recovery of I-/I3- electrolyte in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs). Herein, we attempt to enhance the electrocatalytic activity of kesterite CZTS through element substitution of Zn2+ by Co2+ and Ni2+ cations, considering their high catalytic activity, as well as their similar atomic radius and electron configuration with Zn2+. The Cu2CoSnS4 (CCTS) and Cu2NiSnS4 (CNTS) CEs exhibit smaller charge-transfer resistance and reasonable power conversion efficiency (PCE) (CCTS, 8.3%; CNTS, 8.2%), comparable to that of Pt (8.3%). In contrast, the CZTS-based DSSCs only generate a PCE of 7.9%. Density functional theory calculation indicate that the enhanced catalytic performance is associated to the adsorption and desorption energy of iodine atom on the Co2+ and Ni2+. In addition, the stability of CCTS and CNTS CEs toward electrolyte is also significantly improved as evidenced by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy characterizations. These results thus suggest the effectiveness of the element substitution strategy for developing high-performance CE from the developed materials, particularly for multicomponent compounds.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29880870 PMCID: PMC5992223 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26770-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a–c) XRD patterns, Raman and UV-Vis spectra and (d–f) top-view SEM images of CXTS films prepared by H2O/ethanol precursor solutions. The films of XRD and Raman measurements were prepared on quartz.
Figure 2(a) Tafel curves and (b) EIS plots of Pt and CXTS CEs. Both Tafel and EIS experiments were performed with the symmetrical dummy cells with two identical electrodes (CE//iodide electrolyte//CE). Inset in a and b show the original Tafel curves and the equivalent circuit model of the symmetrical cells for fitting EIS results. (c) J–V curves of DSSCs based on Pt and CXTS CEs, measured under AM 1.5 G solar simulator illumination (100 mW cm−2).
Electrochemical parameters of EIS plots with Pt and CXTS CEs and photovoltaic parameters obtained from DSSCs with Pt and CXTS CEs.
| CE | FF | PCE (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pt | 12.4 | 5.9 | 16.80 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 8.3 |
| CZTS | 13.1 | 6.5 | 16.05 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 7.9 |
| CCTS | 12.9 | 5.3 | 16.79 | 0.68 | 0.72 | 8.3 |
| CNTS | 12.9 | 5.5 | 16.74 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 8.2 |
Figure 3The schematic diagram of reducing triiodides on CXTS (112) surface: adsorption of I2, electron transfer, desorption of I*. The corresponding adsorption energy , bond length are also shown.
Figure 4(a) I 3d, Zn 2p, Co 2p and Ni 2p XPS spectra of CXTS CEs before and after immersing in the iodide electrolyte for 30 minutes. (b) The normalized peak area of I 3d XPS spectra of CXTS CEs after immersing in the iodide electrolyte for 30 minutes and (c) the decrease of peak area of X 2p3/2 XPS spectra of CXTS CEs after immersing.
Figure 5The change of the current density under −0.40 V for different cycles of Tafel polarization measurement of Pt and CXTS CEs. The current density of the first cycle and the last cycle are marked as J1 cycle and J30 cycle, respectively.