Michelle McSkane1, Sebastian Stintzing2, Volker Heinemann2, Alberto Puccini1, Madiha Naseem1, Shu Cao3, Heinz-Josef Lenz4, Ivan Jelas2. 1. Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. 2. Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ludwig-Maximilian-University of Munich, Munich, Germany. 3. Department of Preventive Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. 4. Division of Medical Oncology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA; Department of Preventive Medicine, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA. Electronic address: lenz@med.usc.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found significant relationships between height and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Increased growth has been associated with activated pathways such as insulin-like growth factor 1. This study examined the impact of height on outcomes in metastatic CRC patients enrolled onto the FIRE-3 study, a randomized phase 3 clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 695 patients with metastatic CRC were studied and height was measured in centimeters. Male patients were grouped as ≤ 165, 166-175, 176-185, and ≥ 186 cm in height; female patients were grouped as ≤ 154, 155-164, 165-174, and ≥ 175 cm in height. Primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: When patients' heights were categorized into 4 groups, the tallest group showed a worse OS compared to the shortest group; however, there was no linear relationship between height and OS. To investigate this, we showed the association between height as a continuous variable and OS. Patients shorter than 172 cm had a worse OS as their height decreased. Patients taller than 172 cm had a worse OS as their height increased. Moreover, patients with heights between 165 and 179 cm had a better OS compared to other patients (P = .05). This effect was independent of treatment arm and gender. CONCLUSION: Patients shorter than 165 cm and taller than 179 cm have a worse OS, while those between 165 and 179 cm have a better OS. Hence, clinicians should consider height as an important prognostic factor when treating metastatic CRC patients. Future prospective studies are warranted to shed light on the mechanisms underlying the worse OS in taller patients.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found significant relationships between height and colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. Increased growth has been associated with activated pathways such as insulin-like growth factor 1. This study examined the impact of height on outcomes in metastatic CRC patients enrolled onto the FIRE-3 study, a randomized phase 3 clinical trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 695 patients with metastatic CRC were studied and height was measured in centimeters. Male patients were grouped as ≤ 165, 166-175, 176-185, and ≥ 186 cm in height; female patients were grouped as ≤ 154, 155-164, 165-174, and ≥ 175 cm in height. Primary end point was overall survival (OS); secondary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: When patients' heights were categorized into 4 groups, the tallest group showed a worse OS compared to the shortest group; however, there was no linear relationship between height and OS. To investigate this, we showed the association between height as a continuous variable and OS. Patients shorter than 172 cm had a worse OS as their height decreased. Patients taller than 172 cm had a worse OS as their height increased. Moreover, patients with heights between 165 and 179 cm had a better OS compared to other patients (P = .05). This effect was independent of treatment arm and gender. CONCLUSION:Patients shorter than 165 cm and taller than 179 cm have a worse OS, while those between 165 and 179 cm have a better OS. Hence, clinicians should consider height as an important prognostic factor when treating metastatic CRC patients. Future prospective studies are warranted to shed light on the mechanisms underlying the worse OS in taller patients.
Authors: Yin Cao; Katharina Nimptsch; Irene M Shui; Elizabeth A Platz; Kana Wu; Michael N Pollak; Stacey A Kenfield; Meir J Stampfer; Edward L Giovannucci Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-11-10 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Volker Heinemann; Ludwig Fischer von Weikersthal; Thomas Decker; Alexander Kiani; Ursula Vehling-Kaiser; Salah-Eddin Al-Batran; Tobias Heintges; Christian Lerchenmüller; Christoph Kahl; Gernot Seipelt; Frank Kullmann; Martina Stauch; Werner Scheithauer; Jörg Hielscher; Michael Scholz; Sebastian Müller; Hartmut Link; Norbert Niederle; Andreas Rost; Heinz-Gert Höffkes; Markus Moehler; Reinhard U Lindig; Dominik P Modest; Lisa Rossius; Thomas Kirchner; Andreas Jung; Sebastian Stintzing Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2014-10-09 Impact factor: 7.396